Tony Blair with President Paul Kagame of Rwanda in April. Mr. Blair has praised the country's progress under Mr. Kagame.Credit Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
LONDON — Not long after stepping down as prime minister in 2007, Tony Blair had drinks at a hotel overlooking the River Thames with Paul Kagame, Rwanda's president. Mr. Blair was planning a charity that would embed Western experts in finance and government in African state ministries, and he said he wanted to begin in Rwanda.
"Tony Blair was pitching himself as a former leader who knew the challenges of government, and he was saying that he could help," said David Himbara, an economist who at the time was a close aide to Mr. Kagame.
In the years since, Mr. Blair has tried to fashion a second act as a globe-trotting do-gooder in Rwanda and a half-dozen other African nations, focusing on poverty and infrastructure though his Africa Governance Initiative, one of the four charities he or his wife, Cherie, have founded. He has also taken on a major diplomatic role in the Middle East as the representative of the so-called quartet — the United States, the European Union, Russia and the United Nations.
But at home, enthusiasm for such endeavors has been tempered by criticism of his equally ambitious business enterprises, through a private consultancy called Tony Blair Associates, whose clients have included controversial monarchs and autocrats like Kazakhstan's president, Nursultan A. Nazarbayev. The British press, which still bristles over Mr. Blair's support of the United States in the Iraq war, is taking aim at his newfound riches from consulting, raising questions over whether he is cashing in on his connections.
In many ways, Mr. Blair faces a perception problem. Years into his postpolitical makeover, confusion lingers about what particular hat he wears at any given time.
Last year, he made headlines after taking part in a conference in which Guinea announced a $5 billion deal with the Mubadala Development Company, Abu Dhabi's state investment fund, to develop an aluminum ore mine and refinery in Guinea. His consulting firm has a contract with Mubadala, while his Africa charity works with Guinea's government. He also talks to the Abu Dhabi government in his role as a quartet diplomat.
His various roles often intersect with polarizing figures, which has only given the press more fodder.
As part of his quartet duties, he worked alongside the Egyptian president Abdel Fattah el-Sisi in a failed attempt to mediate a cease-fire agreement between Israel and Hamas. Mr. Sisi had ousted the previous president after millions came out against the elected government and then relied on a violent crackdown to silence the opposition. That Mr. Blair is also advising Mr. Sisi on an informal basis has only prompted questions about whether he is benefiting financially. Mr. Blair's office said that he was not making money off the relationship.
Mr. Blair, in an interview at his office — in a Mayfair townhouse where John Adams lived when he was the American ambassador — said his "conflict rules are drawn up by a phalanx of lawyers and accountants." While he noted that his business operations helped provide the infrastructure and support for the charitable ones, he said, "There's absolutely no help that goes the other way at all.
Mr. Blair spent a decade as Britain's prime minister, sweeping into power in 1997 using a playbook with some similarities to his friend Bill Clinton's — a youthful, centrist New Labour candidate who pushed out a Conservative government led by John Major. While he helped forge peace in Northern Ireland, the war in Iraq overshadowed his tenure and divided public opinion about him.
From the beginning, his consulting work raised questions in the media about conflicts of interest. In 2008, Mr. Blair, in his role as a quartet diplomat, persuaded the Israeli government to allow a Qatari-owned mobile phone company, which was then called Wataniya Telecom, to operate in the West Bank. Wataniya's parent company was a client of JPMorgan Chase, which employs Mr. Blair as an adviser. Another deal he pushed in his quartet role involved the development of an oil field operated by British Gas, another JPMorgan client, off the coast of Gaza.
Mr. Blair would not comment specifically on his personal finances or on some details of his consulting relationships, but his staff was adamant that the deals were solely diplomatic priorities and Mr. Blair had not been aware of the JPMorgan links. A spokeswoman for the bank said the relationships with the companies were longstanding and the deals were unrelated to Mr. Blair.
At a time when Africa's investment fortunes are rising, Mr. Blair is well positioned, an adviser for hire with employees embedded in several African governmental ministries. With his deep connections, the lines between his roles can blur at times, even if conflicts don't exist.
He and Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan's chief executive, visited Nigeria's president, Goodluck Jonathan, together in 2010 and have appeared together alongside Mr. Kagame. The bank also lent at least one employee to Mr. Blair's Africa charity who then went to work with the Rwanda Governance Board, a state agency that encourages private investment in the country.
JPMorgan officials said Mr. Blair's role was advisory and that he didn't initiate deals. Mr. Blair's staff said he did not profit from his charitable work.
Mr. Blair's work in Rwanda has suffered along with Mr. Kagame's reputation, which has been undercut by reports of ruthlessness and repression. Mr. Himbara, once the government's liaison with Mr. Blair, has long since left. He said his breaking point came after seeing Mr. Kagame order the beating of two aides over their choice of office curtains. (Mr. Kagame offered a somewhat different account of what happened.) Mr. Himbara said Mr. Blair's charity "did good work, but good work when you realize you are working with a criminal state, then good work becomes what?"
Mr. Blair dismisses such criticism, pointing out how far Rwanda has come under Mr. Kagame in the two decades since the Rwandan genocide.
"When we do work in countries where people criticize us, I would say, look at what we're actually doing and then ask yourself, is that something we should be doing or not," he said. "The work we're doing in Rwanda, for example, is about improving their systems for improving the lives of their people and reducing poverty."
Nuts-and-bolts issues like helping plan new roads and electric lines have been a priority. His charity is helping build a solar plant in Rwanda. But Mr. Blair has kept silent on political issues like the criminalization of homosexuality in countries like Liberia. "You can decide to make that your issue in Africa," he said of gay rights. "If you do, that is your issue in Africa."
His charities have applied for financing from the British government in the past but have been rebuffed; British aid officials would not give a reason.
"When we even thought of making an application, there was some big story about how I was about to take money off the British taxpayer," Mr. Blair said, suggesting he might not try again. "It's just not worth the hassle."
He has received a warmer response from the American government, which has awarded one of his charities grants of more than $7 million over several years. The relationship has been helped by high-level friends, including Hillary Rodham Clinton, the former secretary of state.
In 2012, David Miliband, the brother of the current leader of Britain's Labour Party, emailed Secretary Clinton on behalf of the Africa Governance Initiative to ask for her help in getting the State Department to "work closely" with Mr. Blair's charity on development efforts in South Sudan.
Mrs. Clinton replied: "David — I've asked Wendy Sherman, our political director, to coordinate our contacts w you and AGI and am copying her so you and she can communicate directly. We look forward to working w you to help South Sudan."
Much of the discussion about Mr. Blair in Britain has focused on a simple question: How rich is he getting?
Mr. Blair brushed off suggestions in the media that he was worth 100 million pounds, roughly $170 million. "The reports of my wealth are greatly exaggerated," he quipped after a recent speech. "I'm not worth half of that, a third of that, a quarter of that, a fifth of that, and I can go on."
But he is not middle class, either. He is paid a total of $5 million to $7 million a year by three firms: JPMorgan, Khosla Ventures and the Zurich Insurance Group. He gives about a dozen speeches a year; one 2009 speech in the Philippines earned him more than $300,000, but an aide said that was unusually high.
His various enterprises employ more than 200 people. His consultancy operates through a web of businesses with names like Firerush Ventures Limited and Windrush Ventures Limited — the latter reported $3.4 million in profit last year. His companies reported roughly $12 million in net assets. His business perks include private or chartered jet flights and stays at hotels like the Emirates Palace in Abu Dhabi, known for its gold-dispensing vending machine.
Then there is the Blairs' growing collection of properties. They have bought nine houses or apartments, mostly in the last decade, for a total of $28 million, including a house and an adjoining property in central London and a Buckinghamshire estate once owned by the actor John Gielgud.
An aide said many of Mr. Blair's properties had mortgages or were bought on behalf of his children. He also gave millions of dollars of the proceeds from his autobiography, "A Journey: My Political Life," to a charity for injured British troops.
"This notion that I'm about to join the rich list or something is just ridiculous, and I've got no desire to do that," Mr. Blair said. "It's not why I'm doing it."
Comments
Support Our Work Now !
Africa Realities Media is independent. Your support helps us expose injustice, challenge silence and produce evidence-based analysis on Africa and the Great Lakes Region.
Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states, ruling elites, armed groups, military forces and security services. But these abuses are often sustained by international silence, Western lobbying, trade interests, migration deals, mineral access, diplomatic partnerships and unequal global accountability.
Africa Realities Media exposes that system.
Lived Experience Matters
Survivors, displaced communities, refugees, families affected by repression, journalists, activists, women, young people and diaspora voices are not passive subjects. They are knowledge holders.
Their experiences must shape policy, advocacy, journalism and public debate. The people closest to injustice are often closest to the solutions.
The FDLR Myth: How Rwanda Weaponises a Diminished Threat to Justify Occupation Investigation Exposes Contradictions in Rwanda's Security Narrative For over a decade, Rwanda has justified its military presence in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo by citing threats from the FDLR, a Hutu militia group linked to the 1994 genocide. But an investigation into FDLR's actual capabilities, Rwanda's military operations, and patterns of violence reveals a narrative that does not match reality. The FDLR threat, whilst real, has been systematically exaggerated and manipulated to justify objectives that have nothing to do with the militia group. Introduction The Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) occupies a central position in Rwanda's justification for military intervention in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. For more than two decades, Rwandan authorities have portrayed the militia group as an existential threat requiring sustaine...
Cet article identifie le principal obstacle à la responsabilisation de Paul Kagame pour ses actions au Rwanda et dans la région des Grands Lacs : le puissant réseau international de dirigeants politiques, d’anciens présidents, de diplomates, de philanthropes, de personnalités religieuses, d’hommes et de femmes d’affaires, d’institutions internationales, d’organisations sportives, de conseillers et de lobbyistes rémunérés qui, depuis trois décennies, le promeuvent, le légitiment, le défendent et le protègent. Il s’agit d’un article d’identification du problème. Il cherche à comprendre pourquoi Kagame est resté influent et protégé sur la scène internationale malgré des allégations graves et largement documentées concernant les actions militaires du Rwanda en République démocratique du Congo, la répression politique, les opérations extraterritoriales, l’exploitation des ressources minières ainsi que le traitement réservé aux opposants politiques, aux journalistes et aux critiques. La ...
How Paul Kagame Uses Diplomats' "Bury Your Head in the Sand" Strategy as a Green Light to Continue Rwanda's War in the DRC Africa Realities Media | 17 July 2026 The purpose of this article is to expose a deliberate and systematic strategy: Paul Kagame's years-long practice of creating events — diplomatic dinners, RPF party meetings, genocide commemorations, international business forums and RPF Bureau Politique addresses — to which he invites foreign ambassadors and the world's business and political elite for one purpose: to explain, justify, and defend Rwanda's military invasion of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Everybody who follows this region knows the strategy now. The same narrative. The same arguments. The same defiance. At one event he tells the Trump Administration to go to hell. At the next he says those sanctioning him will leave power and he will remain. At the RPF Bureau Politique of 17 July 2026, he tells ambassadors that the on...
Kigali wants Washington to punish Congo too. But a ceasefire that leaves the occupier in place is not peace; it is occupation without noise. African lives are not worth less. African deaths are not normal. Western interests must never become a licence to kill African people. Introduction: A Familiar Complaint On 29 June 2026, Rwanda’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Olivier Nduhungirehe, sat before the cameras of France 24 and declared that his country was “disappointed by the increasingly biased US mediation” in the conflict with the Democratic Republic of Congo. He asked why sanctions had targeted only Rwanda. He called the measures unfair, one-sided and counterproductive. Weeks earlier, President Paul Kagame had told Jeune Afrique that sanctions and threats were insults thrown at Rwanda, and accused Washington of exerting heavy pressure on Rwanda while treating the DRC more delicately. The grievance sounds reasonable until you remember where you have heard it before. Since 2022, the Kr...
Comment Paul Kagame utilise la stratégie diplomatique de « l’autruche » comme feu vert pour poursuivre la guerre du Rwanda en RDC Le but de cet article est d’exposer une stratégie délibérée et systématique : la pratique, poursuivie depuis des années par Paul Kagame, consistant à créer des événements — dîners diplomatiques, réunions du parti FPR, commémorations du génocide, forums internationaux d’affaires et interventions devant le Bureau Politique du FPR — auxquels il invite des ambassadeurs étrangers ainsi que l’élite mondiale des affaires et de la politique dans un seul but : expliquer, justifier et défendre l’invasion militaire de la République démocratique du Congo par le Rwanda. Tous ceux qui suivent cette région connaissent désormais cette stratégie. Le même récit. Les mêmes arguments. La même défiance. Lors d’un événement, il dit à l’administration Trump d’aller au diable. Lors du suivant, il affirme que ceux qui le sanctionnent quitteront le pouvoir tandis que lui restera. Lor...
MASS KILLINGS OF HUTU BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER 1994 IN RWANDA, DRC AND UGANDA INTRODUCTION TO PART 2 Part 1 established the assassination of President Habyarimana, the Bruguière and Spanish investigations, Kagame's responsibility for starting the war, the Kigali massacres, challenges to the "genocide against the Tutsi only" narrative, and the need for UN framework revision. Part 2 documents specific mass killings of Hutu populations that have been systematically erased from history: the Kibeho massacre of 1995, the Byumba Stadium massacre of 1994, the hunting and slaughter of Hutu refugees in the Democratic Republic of Congo from 1996 to 1997, killings in Uganda, and the pattern of political assassinations and property seizures. 2. THE KIBEHO MASSACRE (22 APRIL 1995) 2.1 The Camp and Its Population By April 1995, the Kibeho internally displaced persons camp in Gikongoro prefecture southwestern Rwanda held between 80,000 and 100,000...
T he FDLR Pretext Collapses Under the Weight of Documented Plunder Introduction: A Battle That Tells the Truth When Rwandan-backed RDF/M23 forces fought with extraordinary ferocity to seize and hold Rubaya — a remote mining town in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo — the stated justification was security. Kigali's consistent public line has been that its military presence in the DRC is a response to the threat posed by the Forces Democratiques de Liberation du Rwanda (FDLR), an armed group whose leaders include individuals linked to the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi. This narrative has been accepted, qualified, or left insufficiently challenged by Western governments and multilateral institutions for over a decade. The Battle of Rubaya strips that narrative bare. What unfolded in Rubaya was not a counter-insurgency operation against genocidal remnants. It was a sustained military campaign — reinforced by the Rwanda Defence Forces (RDF), prosecuted at sign...
Le 30 juin 2026, pour la première fois en cinquante-six ans d'existence de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie, les candidats au poste de Secrétaire général ont été auditionnés publiquement devant les ministres des Affaires étrangères des 53 États membres de plein droit, réunis en Conférence ministérielle extraordinaire à Paris. Parmi les quatre prétendants au mandat 2027-2030, qui sera attribué par les chefs d'État au XXe Sommet de la Francophonie à Phnom Penh les 15 et 16 novembre 2026, figure un profil inédit : Dacian Cioloș, ancien Premier ministre de Roumanie, ancien commissaire européen à l'Agriculture et ancien président du groupe Renew au Parlement européen, seul candidat non africain de la course. Cet article, premier d'une série de cinq consacrée aux auditions, analyse la prestation de M. Cioloș sur huit axes : la vision, l'innovation, le développement des communautés locales, la promotion de la langue française, les conflits et la s...
Kigali veut que Washington punisse aussi le Congo. Mais un cessez-le-feu qui laisse l’occupant en place n’est pas la paix ; c’est une occupation sans bruit. Les vies africaines ne valent pas moins. Les morts africaines ne sont pas normales. Les intérêts occidentaux ne doivent jamais devenir un permis de tuer des Africains. Introduction : une plainte familière Le 29 juin 2026, le ministre rwandais des Affaires étrangères, Olivier Nduhungirehe, s’est présenté devant les caméras de France 24 et a déclaré que son pays était « déçu par la médiation américaine de plus en plus biaisée » dans le conflit avec la République démocratique du Congo. Il a demandé pourquoi les sanctions visaient uniquement le Rwanda. Il a qualifié ces mesures d’injustes, unilatérales et contre-productives. Quelques semaines plus tôt, le président Paul Kagame avait déclaré à Jeune Afrique que les sanctions et les menaces étaient des insultes lancées au visage du Rwanda, et avait accusé Washington d’exercer une forte p...
La francophonie utile à l'épreuve des projets concrets Conseillère à la présidence mauritanienne, forte d'une longue expérience auprès de cinq chefs d'État successifs de son pays, Coumba Bâ porte la candidature de la Mauritanie au poste de Secrétaire général de la Francophonie, dont le titulaire du mandat 2027-2030 sera désigné par les chefs d'État au XXe Sommet de la Francophonie, prévu à Phnom Penh les 15 et 16 novembre 2026. Son audition publique du 30 juin 2026 à Paris, devant les ministres des Affaires étrangères des 53 États membres de plein droit, reposait sur un positionnement singulier : celui d'un pays carrefour, à la fois africain, arabe et sahélien, présenté comme un pont possible vers les États qui ont quitté l'organisation. Cet article, quatrième d'une série de cinq consacrée aux auditions, analyse sa prestation sur huit axes : la vision, l'innovation, le développement des communautés locales, la promotion de la langue française, les confli...
Africa Realities Media speaks to Africa and to the developed world. Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states and ruling elites, but they are often protected by international silence, lobbying, public relations, trade interests, migration deals and unequal global accountability. While governments pay lobbyists to present a good image abroad, ordinary African people continue to face violence, hunger, disease, poverty, repression and exclusion. We challenge the normalisation of African suffering and demand equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.
Our work is designed to trigger debate, discomfort and action. We do not only expose injustice; we work for policy and systems change.
We want governments and institutions to address the root causes of inequality, disadvantage, discrimination, exclusion and barriers affecting African people. We believe lasting change must be shaped by people with lived experience.
Exposing Injustice in Africa
Africa Realities Media is an independent African accountability platform based in London. We report, analyse and challenge the systems that shape African suffering, silence African victims and protect abusive power.
We are not here to repeat diplomatic language. We are here to ask the questions that are often avoided: why are African deaths treated as normal? Why are African victims given less urgency? Why are governments that imprison, exclude, displace or kill their own people protected when they serve powerful international interests?
Africa Realities Media gives space to writers, researchers, experts, activists, community voices, campaigners, analysts and people with lived experience who want to contribute thoughtful, responsible and courageous content about the changes needed in the region, as well as the political, economic, cultural and social African realities that are often ignored, minimised or misrepresented.
Our articles and videos aim to encourage debate, raise awareness, stimulate critical thinking and support reflection. We seek to help people in the Great Lakes Region understand their rights to human rights, development and wellbeing, while also encouraging decision-makers to be more transparent, responsive and accountable.
Comments
Post a Comment