Skip to main content

About Africa Realities Media

Latest Analysis

Independent analysis, commentary and investigations on Africa, the Great Lakes Region and international accountability.

[RwandaLibre] The Observer (blog) - Uganda - 28 minutes ago: Nyamwasa: Museveni wrong on Kagame

 

Nyamwasa: Museveni wrong on Kagame

The Observer (blog) - 28 minutes ago
WEDNESDAY, 02 JULY 2014 00:30 WRITTEN BY ROBERT MUKOMBOZI

After the third attempt on the life of former Chief of the Rwanda
Defence Forces, Gen Kayumba Nyamwasa, exiled in South Africa, Robert
Mukombozi talked to him recently in an exclusive interview.

The exiled general discusses what he calls the dictatorship in Rwanda
and compares President Museveni and his own Paul Kagame. Below are
excerpts:

Let me take you back to the events on the eve of March 4, 2014, when
assassins stormed your Johannesburg home. Can you tell us what really
happened?

What happened is that a group of gunmen stormed our home and held the
security guards of the residence hostage. They then proceeded to break
the doors, enter the house and searched for the occupants.

I did not see the men, obviously. However, it is clear that these men
were not common thieves; they came with orders, a calculated plan,
looking for nothing, but the occupants of the house. No items were
stolen, even items that society's stereotype thief would yearn for,
[such as] laptops, a television; they were untouched. The house, with
all wardrobes and doors open wide, was not the scene of a robbery but,
rather, some sort of sadistic game of assassins.

Surely the gunmen had "overpowered" the South African police officers
guarding your resident. Do you think you would have survived the
attack?

I do not know, but somehow we survived. You would not expect them to
guard a refugee with rocket launchers. I also suspect they believed
there was some sense of respect and decency from those whose diplomats
were expelled.

However, I learnt that the gunmen were armed with rifles against
modestly-armed police guards. In that kind of scenario, the odds were
against us. As cliché as it may sound, I believe that when it is your
time, it is, and one cannot change that.

The Kigali establishment has vehemently denied involvement in the
recent attempt...

Rwandan opposition leaders have a similar, but strange way of dying
which does not occur to refugees from other countries living in a
similar environment. Rwanda will always deny the assassinations
abroad and at home. If they were not involved, how do they know it was
a robbery?

Are they insinuating that they ordered a robbery not an assassination?
Denials by the Rwandan government are what inform its international
relations. Look at what has been happening in DRC. For the last
eighteen years, Rwanda has been denying its involvement in that
country despite credible reports from reputable researchers, human
rights organisations and United Nations experts.

Why does the government of Rwanda behave in that manner?

The Kagame regime is similar to Russia under Stalin, where show trials
were a common occurrence, extra-judicial executions were blamed on the
victims and assassinations formed part of foreign policy. The Rwandan
population lives under fear and self-denial. Some people say Rwanda is
an open prison.

Are you suggesting that Rwanda is a dictatorship?

Rwanda is not only led by a dictator; the country is governed in a
totalitarian manner...

Civil liberties are suppressed in Rwanda than in any other country in
Africa. Independent journalists have been forced to flee and critical
media houses closed. Civil society organisations have been co-opted,
including 'opposition' parties lumped into what is known as the forum.
Each one has to be a photocopy of the other to think the same and
compete only in supporting the RPF.

Rwanda under Kagame has had problems [with too many countries]. There
were political assassinations of Rwandans in Kenya, Uganda, South
Africa and abductions in Uganda. Uganda twice threw out Rwandan
diplomats because of misconduct. The American government demanded the
recall of the Rwandan defence advisor. Rwanda did not retaliate out of
fear.

Sweden threw out a Rwandan diplomat because of harassing refugees.
South Africa recalled its High Commissioner from Kigali in 2010.
Rwanda closed its embassies in France and Germany and abolished the
teaching of French language in Rwanda. With this litany of events, are
all these countries and their leaders wrong and Kagame is right?

But President Kagame calls you a traitor.

What else would you expect him to say? He thought we were his slaves
and he is annoyed because we broke the bondage. This is the most
unfortunate outcome of our struggle because President Paul Kagame
imagined and believes that we went to war for four years, lost
countless colleagues for the sole purpose of putting him in power.

Let me remind him that we went to war to fight for democracy, liberty
and freedom, an independent judiciary, a representative parliament,
free media and end the question of refugees, among other things.

It must also be understood that we disagreed with him, not with the
country. Look, if we demand liberty and freedom, does that make us
traitors? If we refused to be personalised, how does that affect the
country/people? True, Kigali is clean but peoples' hearts are bruised
and sour. Rwandans are told to be eternally grateful for a clean city
and keep quiet when their compatriots disappear, [get] imprisoned or
killed.

South Africa kicked out three Rwandan diplomats and one from Burundi
after the botched assassination. Do you think that was an impulsive
decision?

On the contrary they have been too patient and tolerant. They are not
the only ones enduring the Rwandan belligerent foreign policy. The
British warned Rwandan residents in Britain that the Rwandan
government was planning to assassinate some of them and Paul Kagame
was accordingly warned to desist from trying those actions on British
territory.

Like earlier stated, expulsion of Rwandan diplomats has also taken
place in Kenya, Uganda, DRC, France, USA and Germany. No other African
country has a similar turnover of expelled diplomats. This should not
surprise anybody because that is the nature of the regime in Kigali.

South Africa's Justice Minister Jeff Radebe talked of sending "a very
stern warning to anybody anywhere in the world that our country will
not be used as a springboard to do illegal activities." Have they
produced any evidence to back these allegations?

He was quite unequivocal when he stated: "They were involved in a
murder and an attempted murder." South Africa would not take a rush
decision because all relevant institutions have to scrutinise and
agree on such important decisions.

They can only take that decision when they are sure and have shared
the information with all stakeholders. It is not a simple matter that
a government wakes up one morning and expels diplomats.

President Museveni said he was a witness to the economic growth in
Rwanda and its stability. As a veteran patriot of the region, he also
warned those who hobnob with the genocidaires to know that they will
have to contend with the patriotic forces that defeated the traitors.

Do such comments from a sitting president of Museveni's calibre worry you?

This world operates in very many strange ways. At one time, President
Museveni was asked about the development in Rwanda and cleanliness in
Kigali and he responded that 'you cannot wash plates if you have not
eaten.'

He was just being cunning, he knows Kigali is clean because all those
involved in the informal sector business are rounded up and hidden in
the villages or interned on Iwawa island. He is also aware that Uganda
was stable under Idi Amin, but it was not peaceful.

Let me remind him that after the Kisangani clashes between Ugandan and
Rwandan armed forces, President Museveni described President Kagame as
treacherous and later in a letter to Clare Short, President Museveni
categorised Kagame as politically bankrupt. In the same vein, during
his recent visit to the UK, he described Boko Haram as bankrupt.

President Museveni knows that President Kagame has no capacity to see
through the irony of his speech. The Rwandan problem will not be
resolved by war, but through dialogue. President Museveni talked to
his adversaries in the 1980s. I had the opportunity to take part in
the organisation and discussion between the NRA and the UPDA in Gulu.

President Museveni had been in power for less than two years. At that
time, skulls of those who had died in Luweero were all over the place,
but were swiftly buried. In Rwanda, bodies of mothers, fathers and
children are all over for public display and commemoration takes half
a year.

People are ever traumatised by these sights and yet we could bury our
loved ones, write their names on a huge memento at the memorial site,
use a week for remembrance and give our people a chance to heal and
reconcile.

Hobnobbing with the genocidaires! We must find a solution through
dialogue even if it involves the genocidaires because that does not
absolve them of any culpability, but it is important that we listen to
everyone. President Museveni has been calling for dialogue and
tolerance in Kenya in the wake of the 2007 massacres and in Rwanda he
is praising extra-judicial killings and war!

What do you think is influencing/motivating the Ugandan government's
softening stance on Rwanda, despite the kidnappings of Rwandan
refugees from Kampala, among other territorial violations?

I wish I knew. Dr Kizza Besigye stayed in exile in South Africa for
five years and when he returned to Uganda, the FDC branch in South
Africa is still operational and the government of Uganda does not call
them terrorists.

Whatever the case, kidnappings and assassinations of Rwandans in
Uganda – the actions you describe – have vindicated President
Museveni's description of the Rwandan regime as bankrupt. It appears
President Museveni has given them chance and space to prove him right
and they have not disappointed.

President Museveni has not killed Col Kizza Besigye and Gen Mugisha
Muntu who were his minister and army commander respectively. He has
not killed Olara Otunnu, who was previously accused of having called
for negotiations with Joseph Kony. Compare [that] with President
Kagame – incarceration of President Pasteur Bizimungu and the
jubilation about the assassination of Col Patrick Karegeya.

The family of late Col Ogole has been promised assistance to
repatriate his body for a decent burial in his home in Lango. Isn't it
strange that one exudes kindness and empathy at home and preaches
mayhem in the neighbourhood!

There is also an element of capitulation when Col Patrick Karegeya was
assassinated, the actions of the government of Uganda culminated in
many of his Ugandan friends fearing to attend his memorial in Uganda
and his funeral in South Africa because of fear of retaliation from
Kigali.

The Ugandan media was reluctant to report about the assassination also
because of fear. I find it strange that citizens of another country
are terrorised by leadership in the neighbourhood. Well, the British
tried appeasement and the Americans went into isolation after the
First World War, but that did not stop Adolf Hitler from attacking
them.

Let's talk about the killing of former Rwandan spy chief Col Patrick
Karegeya here in South Africa. As a former intelligence officer, what
do think happened?

Col Karegeya was a generous and fair person. These excellent qualities
were his undoing. He helped and trusted, and someone abused his trust.
All I know, those who planned his assassination were motivated by
jealousy and envy. Beyond that, they have gained nothing.

We cannot forget his intelligence nor can we replace his humour. He
was an independent-minded thinker and this did not sit well with
President Kagame. In 2005, he was held incommunicado for six months
with an intention to break his spirit.

When Kagame realised that the incarceration had not changed his
character, he immediately ordered his arrest and arraigned him in a
kangaroo court that sentenced him to two years in prison. In 2011,
while in exile, President Kagame again ordered another trial in
absentia and sentenced him to 20 years in prison.

After his assassination, the insensitive officials in Kigali
celebrated his death and mocked his children. Why all the
spitefulness? How does a leadership become so vindictive? The good
thing is that they identified themselves and Rwandans cannot
second-guess who is responsible for the crime.

How are you coping with the loss of such a great friend?

The shared adversities formed a galvanising bond between our families.
Ours had become one big family and we would share a meal every week.
What I find more challenging is to see Leah as a widow, Portia, Elvis
and Richard, can no longer share the many jokes they used to share
with their father.

However, Rwandans in exile and other foreign supporters clearly
understood the nature of the regime in Rwanda and appreciated his
plight and that of his compatriots. Col Patrick [Karegeya] was a man
of the people and his loss is shared by many across the globe.

http://www.google.ca/gwt/x?gl=CA&hl=en-CA&u=http://www.observer.ug/index.php%3Foption%3Dcom_content%26view%3Darticle%26id%3D32550:-nyamwasa-museveni-wrong-on-kagame%26catid%3D53:interview%26Itemid%3D67&source=s&q=Nyamwasa:+Museveni+wrong+in+Kagame+The+Observer

--
SIBOMANA Jean Bosco
Google+: https://plus.google.com/110493390983174363421/posts
YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9B4024D0AE764F3D
http://www.youtube.com/user/sibomanaxyz999
***Online Time:15H30-20H30, heure de Montréal.***Fuseau horaire domestique:
heure normale de la côte Est des Etats-Unis et Canada (GMT-05:00)***

__._,_.___

Posted by: Jean Bosco Sibomana <sibomanaxyz999@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
.To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to:
RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
_____________________________________________________

More news:  http://www.amakurunamateka.com ; http://www.ikangurambaga.com ; http://rwandalibre.blogspot.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-SVP, considérer  environnement   avant toute  impression de  cet e-mail ou les pièces jointes.
======
-Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Support Our Work Now !

Africa Realities Media is independent. Your support helps us expose injustice, challenge silence and produce evidence-based analysis on Africa and the Great Lakes Region.

Recent Posts

Show more
Africa Realities Media offre un espace aux écrivains, chercheurs, experts, activistes, voix communautaires, militants, analystes et personnes ayant une expérience vécue qui souhaitent contribuer à des contenus réfléchis, responsables et courageux sur les changements nécessaires dans la région des Grands Lacs, ainsi que sur les réalités politiques, économiques, culturelles et sociales africaines souvent ignorées, minimisées ou mal représentées. Nos articles et vidéos visent à ouvrir le débat, renforcer la sensibilisation, encourager la pensée critique et favoriser une réflexion plus profonde sur les réalités vécues par les populations africaines. Nous voulons aider les peuples de la région des Grands Lacs à mieux comprendre leurs droits, notamment leurs droits humains, leur droit au développement, leur droit à la dignité, à la sécurité, au bien-être et à une vie meilleure. À travers nos contenus, nous cherchons également à rappeler aux décideurs, aux institutions publiques, aux acteurs régionaux et internationaux, ainsi qu’aux responsables politiques, leur devoir de transparence, de responsabilité et de redevabilité envers les populations qu’ils prétendent servir. Notre objectif est de contribuer à une culture de vérité, de justice, de participation citoyenne et de protection égale pour tous les peuples africains.

Why We Exist

Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states, ruling elites, armed groups, military forces and security services. But these abuses are often sustained by international silence, Western lobbying, trade interests, migration deals, mineral access, diplomatic partnerships and unequal global accountability. Africa Realities Media exposes that system.

Lived Experience Matters

Survivors, displaced communities, refugees, families affected by repression, journalists, activists, women, young people and diaspora voices are not passive subjects. They are knowledge holders. Their experiences must shape policy, advocacy, journalism and public debate. The people closest to injustice are often closest to the solutions.

Our Principle

Africa Realities Media is rooted in one principle: African lives deserve equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Popular Posts

The FDLR Myth: How Rwanda Weaponises a Diminished Threat to Justify Occupation

The FDLR Myth: How Rwanda Weaponises a Diminished Threat to Justify Occupation Investigation Exposes Contradictions in Rwanda's Security Narrative For over a decade, Rwanda has justified its military presence in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo by citing threats from the FDLR, a Hutu militia group linked to the 1994 genocide. But an investigation into FDLR's actual capabilities, Rwanda's military operations, and patterns of violence reveals a narrative that does not match reality. The FDLR threat, whilst real, has been systematically exaggerated and manipulated to justify objectives that have nothing to do with the militia group. Introduction The Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) occupies a central position in Rwanda's justification for military intervention in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. For more than two decades, Rwandan authorities have portrayed the militia group as an existential threat requiring sustaine...

L’empire des amis internationaux de Kagame : le puissant réseau derrière sa protection internationale

Cet article identifie le principal obstacle à la responsabilisation de Paul Kagame pour ses actions au Rwanda et dans la région des Grands Lacs : le puissant réseau international de dirigeants politiques, d’anciens présidents, de diplomates, de philanthropes, de personnalités religieuses, d’hommes et de femmes d’affaires, d’institutions internationales, d’organisations sportives, de conseillers et de lobbyistes rémunérés qui, depuis trois décennies, le promeuvent, le légitiment, le défendent et le protègent. Il s’agit d’un article d’identification du problème. Il cherche à comprendre pourquoi Kagame est resté influent et protégé sur la scène internationale malgré des allégations graves et largement documentées concernant les actions militaires du Rwanda en République démocratique du Congo, la répression politique, les opérations extraterritoriales, l’exploitation des ressources minières ainsi que le traitement réservé aux opposants politiques, aux journalistes et aux critiques. La ...

Desperate Kagame: Where Does He Go From Here—and What Comes Next?

  How Paul Kagame Uses Diplomats' "Bury Your Head in the Sand" Strategy as a Green Light to Continue Rwanda's War in the DRC Africa Realities Media   |   17 July 2026 The purpose of this article is to expose a deliberate and systematic strategy: Paul Kagame's years-long practice of creating events — diplomatic dinners, RPF party meetings, genocide commemorations, international business forums and RPF Bureau Politique addresses — to which he invites foreign ambassadors and the world's business and political elite for one purpose: to explain, justify, and defend Rwanda's military invasion of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Everybody who follows this region knows the strategy now. The same narrative. The same arguments. The same defiance. At one event he tells the Trump Administration to go to hell. At the next he says those sanctioning him will leave power and he will remain. At the RPF Bureau Politique of 17 July 2026, he tells ambassadors that the on...

The Aggressor’s Complaint: Why Rwanda’s “Biased” US Sanctions Argument Echoes Russia

Kigali wants Washington to punish Congo too. But a ceasefire that leaves the occupier in place is not peace; it is occupation without noise. African lives are not worth less. African deaths are not normal. Western interests must never become a licence to kill African people. Introduction: A Familiar Complaint On 29 June 2026, Rwanda’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Olivier Nduhungirehe, sat before the cameras of France 24 and declared that his country was “disappointed by the increasingly biased US mediation” in the conflict with the Democratic Republic of Congo. He asked why sanctions had targeted only Rwanda. He called the measures unfair, one-sided and counterproductive. Weeks earlier, President Paul Kagame had told Jeune Afrique that sanctions and threats were insults thrown at Rwanda, and accused Washington of exerting heavy pressure on Rwanda while treating the DRC more delicately. The grievance sounds reasonable until you remember where you have heard it before. Since 2022, the Kr...

Kagame désespéré : où va-t-il aller maintenant — et que va-t-il se passer ensuite ?

Comment Paul Kagame utilise la stratégie diplomatique de « l’autruche » comme feu vert pour poursuivre la guerre du Rwanda en RDC Le but de cet article est d’exposer une stratégie délibérée et systématique : la pratique, poursuivie depuis des années par Paul Kagame, consistant à créer des événements — dîners diplomatiques, réunions du parti FPR, commémorations du génocide, forums internationaux d’affaires et interventions devant le Bureau Politique du FPR — auxquels il invite des ambassadeurs étrangers ainsi que l’élite mondiale des affaires et de la politique dans un seul but : expliquer, justifier et défendre l’invasion militaire de la République démocratique du Congo par le Rwanda. Tous ceux qui suivent cette région connaissent désormais cette stratégie. Le même récit. Les mêmes arguments. La même défiance. Lors d’un événement, il dit à l’administration Trump d’aller au diable. Lors du suivant, il affirme que ceux qui le sanctionnent quitteront le pouvoir tandis que lui restera. Lor...

THE GENOCIDE AGAINST THE HUTU. PART 2: DOCUMENTED MASS KILLINGS OF HUTU POPULATIONS

MASS KILLINGS OF HUTU BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER 1994 IN RWANDA, DRC AND UGANDA INTRODUCTION TO PART 2 Part 1 established the assassination of President Habyarimana, the Bruguière and Spanish investigations, Kagame's responsibility for starting the war, the Kigali massacres, challenges to the "genocide against the Tutsi only" narrative, and the need for UN framework revision. Part 2 documents specific mass killings of Hutu populations that have been systematically erased from history: the Kibeho massacre of 1995, the Byumba Stadium massacre of 1994, the hunting and slaughter of Hutu refugees in the Democratic Republic of Congo from 1996 to 1997, killings in Uganda, and the pattern of political assassinations and property seizures. 2. THE KIBEHO MASSACRE (22 APRIL 1995) 2.1 The Camp and Its Population By April 1995, the Kibeho internally displaced persons camp in Gikongoro prefecture southwestern Rwanda held between 80,000 and 100,000...

THE BATTLE OF RUBAYA: Rwanda's War for Minerals Exposed

T he FDLR Pretext Collapses Under the Weight of Documented Plunder   Introduction: A Battle That Tells the Truth When Rwandan-backed RDF/M23 forces fought with extraordinary ferocity to seize and hold Rubaya — a remote mining town in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo — the stated justification was security. Kigali's consistent public line has been that its military presence in the DRC is a response to the threat posed by the Forces Democratiques de Liberation du Rwanda (FDLR), an armed group whose leaders include individuals linked to the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi. This narrative has been accepted, qualified, or left insufficiently challenged by Western governments and multilateral institutions for over a decade. The Battle of Rubaya strips that narrative bare. What unfolded in Rubaya was not a counter-insurgency operation against genocidal remnants. It was a sustained military campaign — reinforced by the Rwanda Defence Forces (RDF), prosecuted at sign...

Analyse de l'audition de M Dacian Cioloș, candidat au poste de Secrétaire général de la Francophonie

  Le 30 juin 2026, pour la première fois en cinquante-six ans d'existence de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie, les candidats au poste de Secrétaire général ont été auditionnés publiquement devant les ministres des Affaires étrangères des 53 États membres de plein droit, réunis en Conférence ministérielle extraordinaire à Paris. Parmi les quatre prétendants au mandat 2027-2030, qui sera attribué par les chefs d'État au XXe Sommet de la Francophonie à Phnom Penh les 15 et 16 novembre 2026, figure un profil inédit : Dacian Cioloș, ancien Premier ministre de Roumanie, ancien commissaire européen à l'Agriculture et ancien président du groupe Renew au Parlement européen, seul candidat non africain de la course. Cet article, premier d'une série de cinq consacrée aux auditions, analyse la prestation de M. Cioloș sur huit axes : la vision, l'innovation, le développement des communautés locales, la promotion de la langue française, les conflits et la s...

Analyse de l'audition de Mme Coumba Bâ, candidate au poste de Secrétaire général de la Francophonie

La francophonie utile à l'épreuve des projets concrets Conseillère à la présidence mauritanienne, forte d'une longue expérience auprès de cinq chefs d'État successifs de son pays, Coumba Bâ porte la candidature de la Mauritanie au poste de Secrétaire général de la Francophonie, dont le titulaire du mandat 2027-2030 sera désigné par les chefs d'État au XXe Sommet de la Francophonie, prévu à Phnom Penh les 15 et 16 novembre 2026. Son audition publique du 30 juin 2026 à Paris, devant les ministres des Affaires étrangères des 53 États membres de plein droit, reposait sur un positionnement singulier : celui d'un pays carrefour, à la fois africain, arabe et sahélien, présenté comme un pont possible vers les États qui ont quitté l'organisation. Cet article, quatrième d'une série de cinq consacrée aux auditions, analyse sa prestation sur huit axes : la vision, l'innovation, le développement des communautés locales, la promotion de la langue française, les confli...

[RwandaLibre] Itangazo ry'inama yahuje amashyaka i Buruseli kuwa 01/02/2014 -

  http://www.veritasinfo.fr/m/article-122363461.html Itangazo ry'inama yahuje amashyaka i Buruseli kuwa 01/02/2014 Nk'uko byari biteganyijwe, kuri uyu wa gatandatu tariki ya 01/02/2014, i Buruseli mu Bubiligi hateraniye inama y'amashyaka atavuga rumwe n'ubutegetsi bwa Perezida Paul Kagame. Ku mashyaka icumi yari yatumiwe, ayabonetse mu nama ni atandatu (60%), ari yo : 1. Forces Démocratiques Unifiées (FDU-Inkingi) ; 2. Forces Démocratiques de Libération du Rwanda (FDLR) ; 3. Pacte Démocratique du Peuple (PDP-Imanzi) ; 4. Parti pour la Démocratie au Rwanda (PDR-Ihumure) ; 5. Parti Social (PS-Imberakuri) ; 6. Rwandan Dream Initiative (RDI-Rwanda Rwiza). Ihuriro FCLR - Ubumwe naryo ryari rihagarariwe muri iyo nama.   Mu gutangira inama, abayijemo batoye umuyobozi wayo. Bamaze gusuzuma no kwemeza umurongo w'ibyigwa, bemeje ko muri iki gihe, ubufatanye  bw'amashyaka ya opposition ari ngombwa cyane  ...

Why Africa Realities Media Is Different

Africa Realities Media speaks to Africa and to the developed world. Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states and ruling elites, but they are often protected by international silence, lobbying, public relations, trade interests, migration deals and unequal global accountability. While governments pay lobbyists to present a good image abroad, ordinary African people continue to face violence, hunger, disease, poverty, repression and exclusion. We challenge the normalisation of African suffering and demand equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Pourquoi Africa Realities Media est différent?

Africa Realities Media s’adresse à l’Afrique et au monde développé. De nombreux abus subis par les peuples africains sont commis par des États africains et des élites dirigeantes, mais ils sont souvent protégés par le silence international, le lobbying, les relations publiques, les intérêts commerciaux, les accords migratoires et une responsabilité mondiale inégale. Tandis que des gouvernements paient des lobbyistes pour présenter une bonne image à l’étranger, des Africains ordinaires continuent de faire face à la violence, à la faim, aux maladies, à la pauvreté, à la répression et à l’exclusion. Nous contestons la normalisation de la souffrance africaine et exigeons une vérité égale, une justice égale et une protection égale.

BBC News

Policy and Systems Change

Our work is designed to trigger debate, discomfort and action. We do not only expose injustice; we work for policy and systems change. We want governments and institutions to address the root causes of inequality, disadvantage, discrimination, exclusion and barriers affecting African people. We believe lasting change must be shaped by people with lived experience.

Exposing Injustice in Africa

Africa Realities Media is an independent African accountability platform based in London. We report, analyse and challenge the systems that shape African suffering, silence African victims and protect abusive power. We are not here to repeat diplomatic language. We are here to ask the questions that are often avoided: why are African deaths treated as normal? Why are African victims given less urgency? Why are governments that imprison, exclude, displace or kill their own people protected when they serve powerful international interests?

Africanews

Africa Realities Media gives space to writers, researchers, experts, activists, community voices, campaigners, analysts and people with lived experience who want to contribute thoughtful, responsible and courageous content about the changes needed in the region, as well as the political, economic, cultural and social African realities that are often ignored, minimised or misrepresented. Our articles and videos aim to encourage debate, raise awareness, stimulate critical thinking and support reflection. We seek to help people in the Great Lakes Region understand their rights to human rights, development and wellbeing, while also encouraging decision-makers to be more transparent, responsive and accountable.

Recent Posts

Appel à contributions

Sensibilisez le public aux causes qui vous tiennent à cœur. Prenez part au changement que vous souhaitez voir émerger. Aidez à combattre l’injustice partout où elle se manifeste.

Africa Realities Media accueille des articles originaux, analyses, tribunes, réflexions communautaires et commentaires fondés sur des faits concernant la région des Grands Lacs africains, ainsi que les questions liées à la justice, aux droits humains, à la gouvernance, aux conflits, à la paix, aux réfugiés, aux ressources naturelles et à la responsabilité publique en Afrique.

Nous accueillons également les annonces concernant de nouvelles ou d’anciennes publications liées à nos domaines d’intérêt. Vous pouvez annoncer gratuitement votre publication, notamment un livre, un rapport, une étude, un article académique ou tout autre travail pertinent.

Les articles doivent être rédigés en anglais ou en français et ne doivent pas dépasser 1 500 mots.

Veuillez inclure le nom complet de l’auteur, qui sera publié avec l’article s’il est accepté.

Avant de soumettre votre article, veuillez d’abord lire nos pages du site web afin de vérifier si votre article correspond à nos priorités éditoriales, à nos thèmes et à nos domaines d’intérêt.

Si vous avez un article, un commentaire ou une annonce de publication à partager avec un public plus large, veuillez l’envoyer par email à :

africarealitiesmedia@gmail.com

Nous étudierons la possibilité de publier gratuitement les articles et annonces de publications appropriés s’ils répondent à nos critères éditoriaux, notamment la pertinence, la clarté, l’originalité, l’intérêt public, le respect des communautés concernées et l’utilisation responsable des informations et des preuves.

Les articles sont publiés tels qu’ils sont soumis s’ils répondent à nos critères et à notre politique éditoriale. Nous ne procédons pas à une modification supplémentaire de votre article avant sa publication.