Skip to main content

[AfricaWatch] Towards Arusha ll for Rwanda or end of FDLR

 


During the Rwandan civil war of 90/94, sides to the armed conflict, meaning the Rwandan Patriotic Front [RPF] of Paul Kagame and the Rwandan government of Juvenal Habyarimana at the time met in Arusha for several months of 1992 and 93 before coming to an agreement for peace on August 4th, 1993. Unfortunately this agreement was thrown in the air by RPF which did not want to share power with nobody else. War resumed after the assassination of the Rwandan president on April 6th 1994. It officially ended in July of that year after the killing of hundreds of thousands of civilians from all the ethnic groups of the Rwandan society.

More than two decades later, the failure of Arusha negotiations should demand from any side that will be called upon to discuss the future of Rwanda to learn seriously the lessons: asking why they failed. One of the reasons of such failure has been the fact that these negotiations were not owned by Rwandans. They were instruments in the hands of whichever forces either regional or international which wanted to get access to the Democratic Republic of Congo [DRC] and exploit its minerals freely. That Paul Kagame took advantage of the ambitions of diverse parties involved to impose to Rwandans the old order of his Tutsi ancestors who ruled over the country for several centuries, the amounts of benefits blinded their beneficiaries in front of his criminal excesses both in Rwanda and DRC.

At two occasions it was almost only through the intervention of countries from SADC that it was possible to counter Kagame and his affiliates in crime and their destabilizing activities in the entire region for the last twenty five years. The first time was during the 1998 war of the Congo and the second time with the intervention of the international brigade consisting of soldiers from SADC and operating under MONUSCO. After defeating M23, the turn was for FDLR. And probably because of the fact that this rebel group decided to use peaceful means to achieve its political intentions. Kikwete who privileges peaceful talks to war, received insults from Rwandan authorities when he called for dialogue between opposing sides. [the video is showing president Kikwete explaining to fellow Tanzania his position and that of his government on Kagame's insults towards his person]

Despite Kagame's opposition to such talks, he is being gradually cornered in such a way that he might loose many of the members in his clan he counts strongly to count on. And the pressure around his neck is taking momentum. Are Rwandans ready for another ARUSHA Agreement or are we ready to welcome the FDLR as a political force instead of being considered otherwise. If the whole situation is not dealt with appropriately, the rebel movement might be ended without a shot.

Rate this:

__._,_.___

Posted by: Nzinink <nzinink@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)

Yahoo Groups
Control your view and sort preferences per Yahoo Group
You can now control your default Sort & View Preferences for Conversations, Photos and Files in the membership settings page.

----------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.
More News:http://changingafrica.blogspot.co.uk/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaWatch@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaWatch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaWatch-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaWatch-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OIF : Louise Mushikiwabo, une candidature embarrassante pour un troisième mandat de trop

C'était en novembre 2025, à Kigali. En marge de la 46e Conférence ministérielle de la Francophonie, Louise Mushikiwabo prenait la parole avec l'assurance de celle qui n'a rien à craindre : de nombreux pays, affirmait-elle, lui avaient demandé de se représenter. Spontanément. Naturellement. Unanimement presque. Sauf que les faits racontent une tout autre histoire. L'annonce qui ne devait pas avoir lieu si tôt Novembre 2025. Le Centre de Conventions de Kigali accueille plus de 400 délégués des 90 États membres de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Le thème officiel porte sur les femmes et l'égalité des genres, trente ans après Pékin. Mais en marge des séances plénières, c'est une autre affaire qui agite les couloirs : Louise Mushikiwabo vient d'annoncer qu'elle souhaite briguer un troisième mandat. L'annonce est prématurée. Délibérément. Les candidatures ne ferment qu'en avril 2026. Aucun autre pays n'a encore ...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines ne fonctionnent pas contre le Rwanda

Pourquoi Paul Kagame a ignoré les sanctions américaines et la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU Entre février 2025 et mars 2026, le Trésor américain a imposé deux séries de sanctions ciblant directement la machine de guerre du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo : d'abord James Kabarebe, ministre d'État rwandais et principal intermédiaire du régime auprès du M23, puis les Forces de défense rwandaises en tant qu'entité, ainsi que quatre de leurs hauts responsables. Chacun des individus sanctionnés est demeuré en poste. Les FDR ne se sont pas retirées. Cette analyse examine pourquoi les mesures de Washington n'ont pas modifié la conduite du Rwanda — et pourquoi, selon les propres mots de Kagame, elles sont rejetées comme l'œuvre des « simplement stupides ».     Introduction : des sanctions sans conséquence La campagne de sanctions de Washington contre les opérations militaires du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo s'...

Paul Kagame: “We refuse to remove defensive measures"

Paul Kagame Refuses to Implement the Washington Accords and UN Security Council Resolution 2773: Analysis and Implications In an exclusive interview published on 3 April 2026, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda openly confirmed that Rwandan forces are deployed in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, rejected calls for their withdrawal, dismissed US sanctions as illegitimate, and signalled clear satisfaction with the current military status quo. This briefing examines what Kagame said, what his remarks mean for the Washington Accords, and what concrete steps the United States must now take if it wishes to restore credibility to its diplomacy in the Great Lakes region. Introduction: A Confession Wrapped in Grievance The interview, conducted by François Soudan and published in Jeune Afrique on 3 April 2026, is one of the most candid public statements Paul Kagame has made on Rwanda's military role in the DRC. Its significance does not lie in revealing something previously unknown. Th...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute