Skip to main content

Latest Analysis

Independent analysis, commentary and investigations on Africa, the Great Lakes Region and international accountability.

FW: Eldis Governance Reporter - Focus on Human Rights

In this issue: Reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience; The Millennium Development Goals; My rights, my voice; Nigeria's implementation of the African Charter on Human and People's Rights; Implementing the Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa; International Criminal Court: Recommendations to the 13th Session of the Assembly of States Parties; Human rights indicators

 

Governance

Highlighting research relating to democratic governance, fragile states, institutional development, justice, good governance, public sector & service delivery and urban governance.

HOME

LATEST NEWS

TOPICS

COUNTRY PROFILES

JOBS

CONTACT

Eldis Governance Reporter

12 December 2014
www.eldis.org/go/topics/resource-guides/governance


This is our regular bulletin that highlights recent publications on governance issues.

The documents highlighted here are available to download online without charge. If you are unable to access any of these materials online and would like to receive a copy of a document as an email attachment, please contact our editor at the email address given below.


In this issue:



  1. Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience (Human Development Report 2014)
  2. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2014
  3. My rights, my voice: annual progress report 2013
  4. Nigeria's 5th Periodic Country Report (2011-2014) on the implementation of the African Charter on Human and People's Rights in Nigeria
  5. Implementing the Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa: Analysing the Compliance of Kenya's Legal Framework
  6. International Criminal Court: Recommendations to the 13th Session of the Assembly of States Parties
  7. Human rights indicators: a guide to measurement and implementation

Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience (Human Development Report 2014)

Produced by: United Nations Development Programme (2014)

2014 Human Development Report on reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience.

The 2014 Human Development Report, published by the United Nations Development Programme, is the latest in a long series dedicated to independent, empirically grounded analyses of major development issues, trends, and policies. The theme of the 2014 report is on reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience, and it takes a holistic look at the risks and opportunities.

Chapter one introduces and summarises the aspects of vulnerability and human development covered in the report, each of which are explored in greater depth in the subsequent chapters. These consist of: the state of human development, including continued progress and the emergence of global threats; the interdependent and cumulative vulnerabilities and insecurities faced; building resilience through a number of ambitious policy goal recommendations; and deepening progress through collective action.

The key messages to emerge from the report are highlighted as:

  • Unless vulnerability is systematically addressed by changing policies and social norms, human development will be neither equitable nor sustainable.
  • Life cycle vulnerability, structural vulnerability, and insecure lives are fundamental sources of persistent deprivation, and must be addressed.
  • Policy responses to vulnerability should prevent threats and promote capabilities, and ensure the most vulnerable people are proteced.
  • The principle of universalism should be put into practice to ensure that everyone can fulfill their right to healthcare, education, and basic services.
  • Strong universal social protection not only improves individual resilience, but also the resilience of the economy as a whole.
  • Full employment should be a policy goal for societies at all levels of development, with decent jobs recognised as a fundamental aspect of building human capabilities.
  • With vulnerability an increasingly global affair, collective action and better international governance is required; global efforts and support can facilitate the enactment of national measures.
  • Preparedness and recovery efforts can lessen the effects of major crisis, and can actually leave societies more resilient.

 Available online at: http://www.eldis.org/cf/rdr/?doc=68722


Back to list


The Millennium Development Goals Report 2014

Produced by: UN (2014)

Fourteen years ago, the Millennium Declaration articulated a bold vision and established concrete targets for improving the existence of many and for saving the lives of those threatened by disease and hunger. There has been important progress across all goals, with some targets already having been met well ahead of the 2015 deadline. All stakeholders will have to intensify and focus their efforts on the areas where advancement has been too slow and has not reached all.

Major achievements include:

  • The world has reduced extreme poverty by half. In 1990, almost half of the population in developing regions lived on less than $1.25 a day. This rate dropped to 22 per cent by 2010, reducing the number of people living in extreme poverty by 700 million.
  • Efforts in the fight against malaria and tuberculosis have shown results. Between 2000 and 2012, an estimated 3.3 million deaths from malaria were averted due to the substantial expansion of malaria interventions.
  • Access to an improved drinking water source became a reality for 2.3 billion people. Over 2.3 billion people gained access to an improved source of drinking water between 1990 and 2012.
  • Disparities in primary school enrolment between boys and girls are being eliminated in all developing regions. Substantial gains have been made towards reaching gender parity in school enrolment at all levels of education in all developing regions.
  • The political participation of women has continued to increase. In January 2014, 46 countries boasted having more than 30 per cent female members of parliament in at least one chamber.
  • Development assistance rebounded, the trading system stayed favourable for developing countries and their debt burden remained low.

Challenges include:

  • Major trends that threaten environmental sustainability continue, but examples of successful global action exist.
  • Hunger continues to decline, but immediate additional efforts are needed to reach the MDG target.

[Summary adapted from source]


Available online at: http://www.eldis.org/cf/rdr/?doc=70010

Back to list


My rights, my voice: annual progress report 2013

Produced by: Oxfam (2014)

My Rights, My Voice (MRMV) engages marginalized children and youth in their rights to health and education services in eight countries. The 2013 Annual Progress Report provides an overview of the second year of this innovative three year programme and of the MRMV Global Programme Framework.

In 2013 the Annual Learning Event, Mid-Term Review process, Strategic Gender Review and Global Advocacy Workshop were important moments of reflection, review, alteration and innovation. These events and processes also highlighted programme challenges, especially in relation to strengthening the gender analysis.

There was significant progress against the four key objectives:

  • To increase children and youth's awareness of their rights to health and education services.
  • To strengthen children and youth's and their allies' skills and capacity to claim these rights.
  • To facilitate opportunities for children and youth to engage with duty bearers (e.g. health and education ministries, teaching and medical professionals, religious leaders) which lead to specific actions delivering better access to and quality of health and education services.
  • To strengthen Oxfam and partners' capacity to work on youth agency and support the global campaigning force to facilitate youth claiming and accessing better health and education.

The number of young people and their allies reached through awareness-raising messages in 2013 more than trebled to over 207,000 children, youth and their allies (47 per cent girls and young women). Young people also took greater responsibility for awareness-raising activities, educating their peers and allies using a variety of methods and channels, including social media and popular culture.

MRMV-supported groups' organisational skills and ability to develop shared agendas increased. Critically the number of meetings between organised youth groups and duty-bearers doubled to 113. All projects cited examples of duty-bearers recognising child and youth groups as valid bodies to engage, discuss and consult with about health and education services, listening to them and taking initial action as a result of MRMV lobbying and advocacy activities.

[Summary adapted from source]


Available online at: http://www.eldis.org/cf/rdr/?doc=70007

Back to list


Nigeria's 5th Periodic Country Report (2011-2014) on the implementation of the African Charter on Human and People's Rights in Nigeria


As a member of the African Union (AU), Nigeria was among the first countries to sign (1982), ratify (1983) and domesticate the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR). This is the fifth periodic report submitted by Nigeria to the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights. It complements the earlier report submitted for the period of 2008–2010, highlighting developments that have occurred in Nigeria from 2010 to 2014 in the implementation of the country's obligation under the Charter. Hence, the present progress report provides an update on the implementation of the ACHPR in line with the Commission's 2010 concluding observations, concerns, follow-up maters and recommendations.

In partial fulfilment of the nation's obligation to domesticate all of the relevant regional and international legal instruments it has ratified, this report describes a consolidated bill to domesticate both the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the AU Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa (Maputo Protocol). Named the Gender and Equal Opportunities Bill 2010/13, this draft legislation was before the Nigerian National Assembly at the time this report was submitted.

The report also describes Nigeria's progress toward ensuring the provision of compulsory and free primary education, for the girls. The Nigerian government continues to address the high rate of girls who are out of school. To boost girl-child education nationwide, a tripartite partnership programme and funding between the Federal and State Governments and UNICEF was launched in 2011.

Regarding the enactment of legislation at the federal level prohibiting female genital mutilation (FGM), violence and other discriminatory practices against women, the country reports that women's rights focused civil society organisations and activists have formed a National Coalition on Affirmative Action in Nigeria to push forward the domestication and progressive implementation of both CEDAW and the Maputo Protocol in Nigeria. Efforts are being made by this Coaliton and the Gender Ministry to re-table the Gender and Equal Opportunities Bill (2010/2011) and the Violence against Women Bill in 2013.

Among the other issues addressed in this report are: women's inheritance rights and equal access to land; measures to ensure female participation at all levels of government; providing adequate and comprehensive maternal facilities for women, including ensuring that unsafe out-of-hospital abortions are prevented; ensuring that women have access to micro-credits that will help them establish small businesses; measures that ensure that more women enter the employment market; and funding for women's empowerment.


Available online at: http://www.eldis.org/cf/rdr/?doc=69140

Back to list


Implementing the Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa: Analysing the Compliance of Kenya's Legal Framework

Produced by: Oxfam (2014)

This report analyses the implementation of the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and People's Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa, better known as the Maputo Protocol in Kenya. The Maputo Protocol guarantees comprehensive rights to women. The report analyses the steps that have been taken in Kenya on a legal, policy, and practical level to implement the Maputo Protocol. It is structured around the following themes: Guarantees of Equality and Elimination of Discrimination; Elimination of Violence Against Women; Marriage; Access to Justice; Education; Inheritance; Economic and Social Welfare Rights; and Health and Reproductive Rights.

This paper was developed so that its findings – and the analysis on which these are based – can be used by legal, human rights and development actors across Kenya in their efforts to promote women's rights. It is also hoped that the paper acts as a practical reference for other organisations seeking to use compliance mapping as a starting point for their own advocacy for legal reform in support of women's rights.

The Maputo Protocol can be a powerful tool for change. However, it must be recognized as such and embraced by governments and civil society. While legislative and other measures to protect women's rights should be undertaken once States ratify the Protocol, these actions towards gender equality do not happen automatically. Implementing the Maputo Protocol requires commitment by governments to gender equality as well as strategic efforts by civil society to hold States accountable to their obligations under the Maputo Protocol.

Kenya ratified the Maputo Protocol in 2010, and the government has taken systematic steps towards addressing gender discrimination and inequality through the enactment of pro-women's rights legislation. Kenya's constitution promulgated in 2010 enumerated several specific gains for women in the areas of citizenship, equal rights during and after marriage, elimination of gender discrimination in relation to land matters, gender equity in the political sphere particularly with regard to appointed positions. However, significant challenges and gaps are still a barrier to full implementation of the Protocol.


Available online at: http://www.eldis.org/cf/rdr/?doc=70003

Back to list


International Criminal Court: Recommendations to the 13th Session of the Assembly of States Parties

Produced by: Amnesty International (2014)

The 13th session of the Assembly of States Parties of the International Criminal Court (Assembly) is taking place in New York from 8 to 17 December 2014.

At this session, the Assembly will:

  • Conduct a General Debate about the International Criminal Court (ICC or Court) and the Rome Statute system;
  • Adopt the 2015 budget for the ICC;
  • Elect six judges and seven members of the Committee on Budget and Finance;
  • Conduct a plenary discussion on cooperation with a particular focus on the ICC's role in addressing impunity for crimes of sexual and gender-based violence; and
  • Consider resolutions on cooperation, victims and strengthening the ICC and the Assembly of States Parties, among others.

This paper sets out Amnesty International's recommendations on some of these issues. The recommendations reflect the organization's overarching call for states parties' deliberations and decisions to support the ICC's efforts to combat impunity for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes and to protect the integrity of the Rome Statute.

Recommendations include:

  • During the general debate States parties should affirm their support for the ICC and commit to protect the integrity of the Rome Statute
  • States parties should commit to support and cooperate fully with the ICC's efforts to investigate and prosecute crimes of sexual and gender-based violence
  • The Assembly should ensure that discussions and any action taken as a result are consistent with the Assembly's mandate and respect the independence of the ICC
  • States Parties should ensure that amendments to the Rules of Procedure and Evidence do not undermine the rights of the accused
  • States parties should ensure that the Assembly provides the ICC with sufficient resources to function effectively and independently in 2015

[Summary adapted from source]


Available online at: http://www.eldis.org/cf/rdr/?doc=70005

Back to list


Human rights indicators: a guide to measurement and implementation

Produced by: United Nations High Commission for Human Rights (2012)

The demand for and the use of indicators in human rights are part of a broader process of systematic work to implement, monitor and realize rights. Together with national human rights action plans, baseline studies and rights-based approaches to development and good governance, the oversight work of United Nations human rights mechanisms, and regional and national human rights institutions, indicators provide concrete, practical tools for enforcing human rights and measuring their implementation. There is a recognition that one has to move away from using general statistics and instead progress towards identifying specific indicators for use in human rights. The general statistics are often indirect and lack clarity in their application, whereas specific indicators are embedded in the relevant human rights normative framework and can be more readily applied and interpreted by their potential users.

Human rights standards and principles as a value based, prescriptive narration, essentially anchored in the legalistic language of the treaties, are not always directly amenable to policymaking and implementation. They have to be transformed into a message that is more tangible and operational. Indeed, there is a need for human rights advocates to be equipped with an approach, methodology and specific tools that ensure a better communication with a broader set of stakeholders, who may or may not have had a formal introduction to human rights. At the same time, it is important to ensure that the message so created withstands rigorous scrutiny by the human rights community, as well as by those on the other side of the debate, who may have a greater role or be more directly involved in the implementation of human rights (e.g., policymakers).

It is this gap between theory and practice that is expected to be bridged, in part, by identifying appropriate indicators for human rights. Moreover, the exercise of identifying and using suitable indicators—quantitative as well as qualitative— also helps in clarifying the content of human rights standards and norms. While the interpretation of human rights standards (such as by the treaty bodies or by courts) is a separate step in the monitoring process, the use of indicators helps to ensure that the interpretive phase is well informed. This could, in turn, facilitate the implementation and attainment of the objectives associated with the realization of human rights.

[Summary adapted from source]


Available online at: http://www.eldis.org/cf/rdr/?doc=70008

Back to list 


See our Governance Resource Guide for a complete list of new additions.

You are welcome to re-use material from this bulletin on your own website but please acknowledge Eldis as the source and include a link to the Eldis website (either to our home page or to the home page of one of our Resource Guides). Eldis data is available under a creative commons license and is accessible via an Open API for others to re-use. In addition we have developed a number of plug-ins and modules for website content management systems such as WordPress, Joomla and Drupal to make it easier for website managers and bloggers to integrate Eldis content into their sites. See www.eldis.org/go/get-the-data for more information

If you would like to change your subscription or receive this bulletin (or any other of our subject focused email bulletins) regularly, you can register from our website, or just send an email to the address below.

You can also receive this update as an RSS Newsfeed. Visit our page at: http://www.eldis.org/go/subscribe


Eldis is funded by UKAid and Irish Aid.

Eldis is one of a family of Knowledge Services at IDS.

The views expressed in this newsletter and on the Eldis website are the opinion of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Eldis, IDS or its funders.


Contact details:
Julia Hamaus
Eldis Programme
Institute of Development Studies
Sussex Brighton BN1 9RE
UK

Email:eldis@ids.ac.uk
Tel: +44 1273 915818
Fax: +44 1273 621202
WWW: www.eldis.org/go/topics/resource-guides/governance


If you would like to receive information about other Knowledge Services and publications from IDS, please email your name, contact details and subject interests to us at knowledgeservices@ids.ac.uk


Eldis Resource Guides

Agriculture and food Climate change Conflict and security Gender Governance HIV and AIDS Health Health systems ICTs for development Rising Powers

 

follow on Twitter | Like on Facebook |

Copyright © 2013 The Institute of Development Studies, All rights reserved.
Our mailing address is: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RE. UK

 

Comments

Support Our Work Now !

Africa Realities Media is independent. Your support helps us expose injustice, challenge silence and produce evidence-based analysis on Africa and the Great Lakes Region.

Recent Posts

Show more
Africa Realities Media offre un espace aux écrivains, chercheurs, experts, activistes, voix communautaires, militants, analystes et personnes ayant une expérience vécue qui souhaitent contribuer à des contenus réfléchis, responsables et courageux sur les changements nécessaires dans la région des Grands Lacs, ainsi que sur les réalités politiques, économiques, culturelles et sociales africaines souvent ignorées, minimisées ou mal représentées. Nos articles et vidéos visent à ouvrir le débat, renforcer la sensibilisation, encourager la pensée critique et favoriser une réflexion plus profonde sur les réalités vécues par les populations africaines. Nous voulons aider les peuples de la région des Grands Lacs à mieux comprendre leurs droits, notamment leurs droits humains, leur droit au développement, leur droit à la dignité, à la sécurité, au bien-être et à une vie meilleure. À travers nos contenus, nous cherchons également à rappeler aux décideurs, aux institutions publiques, aux acteurs régionaux et internationaux, ainsi qu’aux responsables politiques, leur devoir de transparence, de responsabilité et de redevabilité envers les populations qu’ils prétendent servir. Notre objectif est de contribuer à une culture de vérité, de justice, de participation citoyenne et de protection égale pour tous les peuples africains.

Why We Exist

Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states, ruling elites, armed groups, military forces and security services. But these abuses are often sustained by international silence, Western lobbying, trade interests, migration deals, mineral access, diplomatic partnerships and unequal global accountability. Africa Realities Media exposes that system.

Lived Experience Matters

Survivors, displaced communities, refugees, families affected by repression, journalists, activists, women, young people and diaspora voices are not passive subjects. They are knowledge holders. Their experiences must shape policy, advocacy, journalism and public debate. The people closest to injustice are often closest to the solutions.

Our Principle

Africa Realities Media is rooted in one principle: African lives deserve equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Popular Posts

THE BATTLE OF RUBAYA: Rwanda's War for Minerals Exposed

T he FDLR Pretext Collapses Under the Weight of Documented Plunder   Introduction: A Battle That Tells the Truth When Rwandan-backed RDF/M23 forces fought with extraordinary ferocity to seize and hold Rubaya — a remote mining town in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo — the stated justification was security. Kigali's consistent public line has been that its military presence in the DRC is a response to the threat posed by the Forces Democratiques de Liberation du Rwanda (FDLR), an armed group whose leaders include individuals linked to the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi. This narrative has been accepted, qualified, or left insufficiently challenged by Western governments and multilateral institutions for over a decade. The Battle of Rubaya strips that narrative bare. What unfolded in Rubaya was not a counter-insurgency operation against genocidal remnants. It was a sustained military campaign — reinforced by the Rwanda Defence Forces (RDF), prosecuted at sign...

LA BATAILLE DE RUBAYA : La guerre du Rwanda pour les minerais exposée

Le prétexte des FDLR s’effondre sous le poids du pillage documenté Introduction : une bataille qui dit la vérité Lorsque les forces RDF/M23 soutenues par le Rwanda ont combattu avec une férocité extraordinaire pour s’emparer de Rubaya et la conserver — une ville minière reculée du Nord-Kivu, dans l’est de la République démocratique du Congo — la justification officielle était la sécurité. La ligne publique constante de Kigali a été que sa présence militaire en RDC répond à la menace posée par les Forces démocratiques de libération du Rwanda (FDLR), un groupe armé dont les dirigeants comprennent des individus liés au génocide de 1994 contre les Tutsi. Ce récit a été accepté, nuancé, ou laissé insuffisamment contesté par les gouvernements occidentaux et les institutions multilatérales pendant plus d’une décennie. La bataille de Rubaya met ce récit à nu. Ce qui s’est déroulé à Rubaya n’était pas une opération de contre-insurrection contre des restes génocidaires. C’était une campagne mili...

Les remèdes cosmétiques de la France face à la guerre dans l’est de la RDC

Résolution 2773, Conférence de Paris, doctrine macronienne du dialogue et pari de la Francophonie La politique de la France à l’égard de l’est de la RDC a produit un schéma constant : un langage public fort, une faible application des décisions, aucune pression visible fondée sur les sanctions, et des appels répétés au dialogue qui laissent largement intact le levier militaire et politique du Rwanda. La France ne peut pas rédiger des résolutions, organiser des conférences, rejeter les sanctions, appeler au dialogue, puis revendiquer la neutralité pendant que les civils restent sous occupation, déplacement et violence. Dans une guerre de cette ampleur, le silence et l’inaction ne sont pas neutres. Ce sont des actes politiques. Introduction La France se présente comme l’une des puissances occidentales les plus engagées dans la recherche de la paix dans l’est de la République démocratique du Congo. Elle a parrainé la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies. Elle a organ...

President Macron Against US Sanctions on Rwanda

How France's Interests in Mozambique Obstruct Peace in the DRC A Critical Analysis of Emmanuel Macron's Interview with TV5 Monde, Africa Forward Summit, Nairobi, 12 May 2026 Published by The African Rights Campaign (ARC)   |   London, May 2026   1. Introduction This analysis is based on French President Emmanuel Macron's interview with TV5 Monde, conducted on 12 May 2026 during the Africa Forward Summit in Nairobi, Kenya. In that interview, Macron was asked a direct question: given that Rwanda's support for the M23 armed group has been documented by United Nations experts, and given that the United States has imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force and several of its senior officers, why have France and the European Union declined to do the same? Macron's response was unconvincing, dishonest and analytically incoherent. It revealed not a carefully calibrated position of principled neutrality, but the operational logic of a government that has c...

[AFRICAFORUM] Tr : [hinterland1] Tr : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE

  ----- Mail transféré ----- De : Mpania Jean <drjeanmpania@yahoo.fr> À : Hinterland <hinterland1@yahoogroupes.fr> Envoyé le : Mercredi 26 février 2014 17h13 Objet : [hinterland1] Tr : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE   Le Mercredi 26 février 2014 9h56, congokdp <congokdp@gmail.com> a écrit : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE :   Voici comment les institutions et tout le système de sécurité de la RDC sont sous contrôle du Rwanda et les officiels congolais infiltrés par des «hirondelles» rwandaises! L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE :  Voici comment les institutions et tout le système de sécurité de la RDC sont sous contrôle du Rwanda et les officiels congolais infiltrés par des «hirondelles» rwandaises! Le processus d'occupation de la RDC par le lobby tutsi rwandais passe par le...

The Kagame Myth: Western Power, Private Jets and Rwanda’s Controlled Reality

  ANALYSIS AND INVESTIGATION Introduction: The Myth and the Man Behind the Myth There is a version of Paul Kagame that exists in the conference halls of Davos, in the pages of Western magazines, in private hotel meetings in London, Paris and Washington, and on the sleeves of European football shirts. In this version, Kagame is a visionary. A builder. A disciplined African moderniser. A leader who pulled a broken country from the ashes of genocide and turned it into what admirers often call the “Singapore of Africa”. In this version, Rwanda is clean, efficient, safe, investment-friendly and orderly. Kagame is presented as the African leader the West wants to believe in: controlled, polished, pro-market, security-focused and comfortable in elite Western spaces. Then there is the Rwanda that many Rwandans, exiles, journalists, opposition figures and human rights organisations describe. In this Rwanda, YouTubers and online commentators are jailed for what they say. Critics die in custo...

Dr Phil Clark ( SOAS University of London): A biased lecturer and researcher about African issues.

Dr Phil Clark   was born in Sudan and   is currently   working at SOAS University of London. He is known to be   biased lecturer and researcher about African issues, particularly the Rwandan genocide.     With his poor judgement and analytical thinking, this man only talk about   the results   of events and forget the     root causes. He is a staunch supporter of the criminal, dictator and killer Paul Kagame , the President of   Rwanda. He is singing the song of the winner of the Rwandan  war. He is in the same boat with Linda Melvern, a biased British   freelancer who received a medal from the dictator Paul     Kagame. "> "> Dr.Phil Clark "> Linda Melvern I am asking Dr Phil Clark   one question:   Dear   Dr Phil Clark, What     was the   role of   Paul Kagame and RPF in the Rwandan  massacres and genocide in and outside Rwanda?   Based...

Le Président Macron contre les sanctions américaines imposées au Rwanda

Comment les intérêts français au Mozambique font obstacle à la paix en RDC Analyse critique de l'entretien d'Emmanuel Macron avec TV5 Monde, Africa Forward Summit, Nairobi, 12 mai 2026 Publié par The African Rights Campaign (ARC)   |   Londres, mai 2026     1. Introduction La présente analyse est fondée sur l'entretien accordé par le président français Emmanuel Macron à TV5 Monde, le 12 mai 2026, lors de l'Africa Forward Summit à Nairobi, au Kenya. Au cours de cet entretien, Macron s'est vu poser une question directe : étant donné que le soutien du Rwanda au groupe armé M23 est aujourd'hui documenté par les experts des Nations Unies, et étant donné que les États-Unis ont imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense du Rwanda (FDR) ainsi qu'à plusieurs de leurs hauts responsables, pourquoi la France et l'Union européenne n'ont-elles pas fait de même ? La réponse de Macron s'est révélée peu convaincante, malhonnête et analytique...

Kagame’s Image Machine: Who Profits While Rwanda Stays Poor

I nvestigation:  Paying to Stay Poor: How Western PR Firms, Lobbyists, Sports Clubs and Media Outlets Profit from Rwanda’s Image Economy Introduction: An Ecosystem of Paid Influence Rwanda is often presented internationally as a model of discipline, security, investment promotion and post-genocide recovery. That image has been carefully built, repeatedly amplified and professionally protected. Behind it sits a costly international network of sports sponsorships, lobbying contracts, public relations firms, legal consultancy, political access, favourable media relationships and diplomatic narrative management. The moral problem is clear. Rwanda remains heavily dependent on foreign aid and external financing. According to World Bank-linked data, foreign aid received by Rwanda reached approximately 1.39 billion US dollars in 2023. UNDP’s 2025 Human Development Report gives Rwanda a Human Development Index value of 0.578 for 2023, placing it 159th out of 193 countries and territories. U...

Justice ou théâtre politique ? Les procès français du génocide rwandais et le travail inachevé de la réconciliation entre Rwandais

Introduction Depuis 2014, les tribunaux français ont poursuivi une série de ressortissants rwandais hutu pour leur rôle présumé dans le génocide de 1994 contre les Tutsi. Le premier procès, celui de l’ancien chef du renseignement Pascal Simbikangwa, a été suivi par les condamnations des anciens bourgmestres Octavien Ngenzi et Tito Barahira en 2016, puis par la condamnation, en 2023, de l’ancien officier de gendarmerie Philippe Hategekimana. Aucun accusé jugé en France, au titre de la compétence universelle, pour le génocide rwandais n’a été acquitté. D’autres poursuites devraient suivre. Ces procédures ont été largement saluées comme la preuve que la France affronte enfin son passé d’État ayant protégé des auteurs présumés du génocide sur son territoire. Des organisations internationales de défense des droits humains, des spécialistes du génocide et une partie de la société civile française les ont présentées comme une contribution tardive, mais bienvenue, à la lutte mondiale contre l’...

Why Africa Realities Media Is Different

Africa Realities Media speaks to Africa and to the developed world. Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states and ruling elites, but they are often protected by international silence, lobbying, public relations, trade interests, migration deals and unequal global accountability. While governments pay lobbyists to present a good image abroad, ordinary African people continue to face violence, hunger, disease, poverty, repression and exclusion. We challenge the normalisation of African suffering and demand equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Pourquoi Africa Realities Media est différent?

Africa Realities Media s’adresse à l’Afrique et au monde développé. De nombreux abus subis par les peuples africains sont commis par des États africains et des élites dirigeantes, mais ils sont souvent protégés par le silence international, le lobbying, les relations publiques, les intérêts commerciaux, les accords migratoires et une responsabilité mondiale inégale. Tandis que des gouvernements paient des lobbyistes pour présenter une bonne image à l’étranger, des Africains ordinaires continuent de faire face à la violence, à la faim, aux maladies, à la pauvreté, à la répression et à l’exclusion. Nous contestons la normalisation de la souffrance africaine et exigeons une vérité égale, une justice égale et une protection égale.

BBC News

Policy and Systems Change

Our work is designed to trigger debate, discomfort and action. We do not only expose injustice; we work for policy and systems change. We want governments and institutions to address the root causes of inequality, disadvantage, discrimination, exclusion and barriers affecting African people. We believe lasting change must be shaped by people with lived experience.

Exposing Injustice in Africa

Africa Realities Media is an independent African accountability platform based in London. We report, analyse and challenge the systems that shape African suffering, silence African victims and protect abusive power. We are not here to repeat diplomatic language. We are here to ask the questions that are often avoided: why are African deaths treated as normal? Why are African victims given less urgency? Why are governments that imprison, exclude, displace or kill their own people protected when they serve powerful international interests?

Africanews

Africa Realities Media gives space to writers, researchers, experts, activists, community voices, campaigners, analysts and people with lived experience who want to contribute thoughtful, responsible and courageous content about the changes needed in the region, as well as the political, economic, cultural and social African realities that are often ignored, minimised or misrepresented. Our articles and videos aim to encourage debate, raise awareness, stimulate critical thinking and support reflection. We seek to help people in the Great Lakes Region understand their rights to human rights, development and wellbeing, while also encouraging decision-makers to be more transparent, responsive and accountable.

Appel à contributions

Sensibilisez le public aux causes qui vous tiennent à cÅ“ur. Prenez part au changement que vous souhaitez voir émerger. Aidez à combattre l’injustice partout où elle se manifeste.

Africa Realities Media accueille des articles originaux, analyses, tribunes, réflexions communautaires et commentaires fondés sur des faits concernant la région des Grands Lacs africains, ainsi que les questions liées à la justice, aux droits humains, à la gouvernance, aux conflits, à la paix, aux réfugiés, aux ressources naturelles et à la responsabilité publique en Afrique.

Nous accueillons également les annonces concernant de nouvelles ou d’anciennes publications liées à nos domaines d’intérêt. Vous pouvez annoncer gratuitement votre publication, notamment un livre, un rapport, une étude, un article académique ou tout autre travail pertinent.

Les articles doivent être rédigés en anglais ou en français et ne doivent pas dépasser 1 500 mots.

Veuillez inclure le nom complet de l’auteur, qui sera publié avec l’article s’il est accepté.

Avant de soumettre votre article, veuillez d’abord lire nos pages du site web afin de vérifier si votre article correspond à nos priorités éditoriales, à nos thèmes et à nos domaines d’intérêt.

Si vous avez un article, un commentaire ou une annonce de publication à partager avec un public plus large, veuillez l’envoyer par email à :

africarealitiesmedia@gmail.com

Nous étudierons la possibilité de publier gratuitement les articles et annonces de publications appropriés s’ils répondent à nos critères éditoriaux, notamment la pertinence, la clarté, l’originalité, l’intérêt public, le respect des communautés concernées et l’utilisation responsable des informations et des preuves.

Les articles sont publiés tels qu’ils sont soumis s’ils répondent à nos critères et à notre politique éditoriale. Nous ne procédons pas à une modification supplémentaire de votre article avant sa publication.