Skip to main content

Latest Analysis

Independent analysis, commentary and investigations on Africa, the Great Lakes Region and international accountability.

[AfricaRealities.com] Re: [AfricaRealities] UK charities such as Africa Relief Trust are exploiting Africa through UK nation-wide fundraising strategies where the money raised is never used for projects in Africa.

 

This is a real shame!!!

 
Didier Ibwilakwingi-Ekom


De : "Afrika Watch afrikawatch@yahoo.com [AfricaRealities]" <AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com>
À : "africarealities@yahoogroups.com" <africarealities@yahoogroups.com>; "amakurunamateka@yahoogroups.com" <amakurunamateka@yahoogroups.com>
Envoyé le : Vendredi 26 décembre 2014 18h58
Objet : [AfricaRealities] UK charities such as Africa Relief Trust are exploiting Africa through UK nation-wide fundraising strategies where the money raised is never used for projects in Africa.

 
UK charities  such as Africa Relief Trust are exploiting  Africa through UK nation-wide fundraising strategies where the money raised is  never used for projects in Africa. There are many  white led UK charity based organisations in the UK that are just using poverty in Africa to raise money at national level and that money never reach Africa at all. But when a UK charity is run by a black person, it  would not manage to fundraise a penny from British people.
 
These charities are run  by white people and even when a  black person  is involved, he/she has no control of the expenditure of the money raised as part of the well-known discrimination and racism practices that  prevail in the UK. In the UK, a charitable organisation runs by a black  person or any other person who is not white  could not raise any funding at all.  Comic Relief is supporting this corruption practice and failed to open an investigation related to Africa Relief Trust which  received £170, 000 as grant , but that money was not used for charitable activities in Africa.  Comic Relief just relies on the paper-based reports submitted by to them by the charity while there is no evidence about the outcomes achieved by Africa Relief Trust in their
work in Africa. While the white British people frequently  criticise African people for corruption, when it is about corruption that  they are involved  themselves in Africa, they governments, funders and institutions support that corruption.

--------------------------------------------------------

Watchdog probes East Lancashire Africa charity

 
A BLACKBURN and Ribble Valley charity, which received £170,000 from Comic Relief, is the subject of a major investigation by the sector's national regulator.
The Charity Commission has opened a 'statutory inquiry' into the Africa Relief Trust (ART).
The probe centres on whether claims made for discounts on businesses rates by the charity for using several empty properties across the UK, including a number in Blackburn with Darwen, are valid.
The commission is concerned that if they are not legally correct, the unpaid cash due could force ART into bankruptcy.
It is also examining whether the four trustees of the charity, the owners of the empty buildings, or anyone else, made a personal profit from the discount claims in contravention of charity law.
ART gives a modest family home at 38, St James's Road in the Blackburn as its address on its website but now operates from a property in Inglewhite Road, Longridge.
The probe is the most serious the regulator can undertake and can lead to police investigations and court action.
The commission undertook 1,528 compliance investigations in 2012/2013 but just 15 resulted in a 'statutory inquiry'.
The probe into ART, which works mainly in Northern Uganda, centres on whether the trustees correctly claimed business rate relief on several premises in Blackburn with Darwen borough and other local authorities in the last two years and whether any liability for payments to those councils might jeopardise its financial viability.
The charity commission said it was examining 'whether the charity trustees have properly discharged their trustee duties when making decisions to enter into tenancy agreements and occupy those properties to further their charitable purposes and whether any benefit to the landlord or other parties is incidental to that.' It said its investigation began as a compliance case in September 2011 but escalated into a statutory inquiry 'as the commission's concerns about the risks to the charity's assets and about the trustees' failure to provide full and complete information mounted' According to the Charity Commission website the trustees are Anthony Thomas Robert Peers, Rachel Carr, Ambassador Joseph Ocwet and Mrs Betty Ocwet.
Mr Peers was initially contacted by the Lancashire Telegraph by email and then rang to reveal ART now operated from Longridge. Mr Ocwet, a fomer Ugandan ambassador to the African Union, did not reply to emails.
The charity was first registered in 1999 and raised £5,573 between July 1 2008 and June 30 2012 and spent £5,291 over the same five-years - the only period returns are publicly available.
The BBC's Comic Relief charity confirmed it gave ART £170,000 between 2001 and 2007.
When the Lancashire Telegraph visited the Blackburn address, which is not one of the properties subject to the rate relief claims and is Mr Peers former home, it had been sold to a new owner and then let by Harris Properties of Whalley Old Road to tenants.
Babar Salim, manager at Harris Properties, said: "We have let this property for three years. We know nothing about the Africa Relief Trust, Mr Peers or Ms Carr but the property has received letters and visits from bailiffs seeking to speak to them."
While the property remains as ART's address on the website, it now operates from Longridge and gives a PO Box in Preston as its contact address Blackburn MP Jack Straw, who received a letter from the commission about the inquiry, said: "This is obviously a matter of concern to me.
"The people of Blackburn are very generous and they need to know that money they give to charities is properly used for the purposes intended."
Ribble Valley MP Nigel Evans said: "The Charity Commission do not embark on this type of inquiry lightly. The trustees of ART need to co-operate fully. The public are very generous in their giving to charities and need to be reassured that their generosity is not being abused."
Mr Peers said that ART had behaved '100 per cent correctly' in regard to business rates relief and was confident it could justify all its rates relief claims.
The 41-year-old former publican who grew up in Revidge, Blackburn, and attended the town's Notre Dame RC High School accused the Charity Commission of poor communication, cancelling meetings and failing to give ART a chance to explain and justify its actions.
Mr Peers said: "The Charity Commission has behaved disgracefully."
He said any visits by bailiffs to the St James's Street, Blackburn property must be on behalf of local councils connected to the business rates relief question.
Mr Peers said: "I got involved in this after a chance meeting in 2010 with Ambassador Ocwet in London. The charity was dormant then. We have revived it and hope to raise between £60,000 and £70,000 this year.
"We originally used my private home in St James's Road as a base but have now moved to Longridge. The bailiffs must have come from some of the local authorities who saw the address on the website. I will have to change it."
ART was set up to assist people in social distress in Africa, more specifically to support those in the conflict areas of Northern Uganda.
According to its website: "The project put smiles on the faces of many impoverished and needy people in poverty stricken Uganda, unfortunately it was short lived and in a very small project area."
Earlier this year ART gave £2,000 towards a trip by nine students from Darwen Aldridge Community Academy to Uganda.
A Comic Relief's statement said:"Between 2001 and 2007 Comic Relief awarded the Africa Relief Trust grants totalling £170,000 for work to support people living with HIV/AIDS in northern Uganda. Comic Relief is committed to ensuring the money we give as grants is spent as agreed, which is why we make phased payments and guarantees have to show us how they have spent the previous money before receiving the next instalment. The final instalment of the grant was awarded in 2007. Comic Relief was satisfied that this grant was spent as it was intended."
A Charity Commission spokeswoman said: "As our investigation is ongoing we will not be making any further comments regarding the Africa Relief Trust."
'None of ART's income has gone on anything but charitable projects'
TRUSTEE Anthony Peers said: "The Trustees of Africa Relief Trust have acted 100 per cent correctly and honestly regarding current rating legislation when accepting donated properties in a bid to raise funds and hold charity awareness events on behalf of Africa's most needy.
"In 2010 ART was dormant because fund raising had ceased and the charity was due to fold. It was at this point that I was appointed as trustee but it is only during the last 18 months that ART has been successfully active.
"On numerous occasions ART have offered to meet with the Charities Commission at their London headquarters but on each occasion they have cancelled, therefore ART have not had an opportunity to explain their actions.
"ART has funded five water boreholes in Northern Uganda and one in South Sudan at a cost of £51,000 since October 2012.
"This year we have funded the construction and furnishing of a primary school in Northern Uganda.
"Many councils' non domestic-rating staff do not understand the current legislation regarding empty property rates. This continues to disrupt our need to further raise awareness for our lifesaving projects.
"None of ART's income has been spent on anything other than charitable projects in Uganda and South Sudan."
'The commission has issued alerts to charities warning them of the risks'
AN official statement, issued on July 25, says: "The Charity Commission has opened a statutory inquiry into Africa Relief Trust.
"The Commission opened a regulatory compliance case into the charity in September 2011 after concerns were raised regarding its business rates relief arrangements.
"As the case progressed, the commission's concerns about the risks to the charity's assets and about the trustees' failure to provide full and complete information mounted.
"Statutory inquiries are opened to investigate regulatory concerns that the commission considers the most serious and allow the use of legal powers, including powers to direct trustees or others.
"The purpose of the inquiry is to examine regulatory concerns including whether the charity trustees have properly discharged their trustee duties when making decisions to enter into tenancy agreements and occupy those properties to further their charitable purposes and whether any benefit to the landlord or other parties is incidental to that.
"The commission has issued alerts to charities warning them of the risks associated with business rates relief."
Owners can avoid business rates
Full business rates are due on empty commercial properties that remain unoccupied after three months.
Charities occupying commercial property qualify for a mandatory 80 per cent discount on business rates, provided the property is used wholly or mainly for charitable purposes. The local authority has discretion to grant the remaining 20 per cent.
The Charity Commission is aware of cases where charities are approached by retailers and landlords of hard to let property to enter into tenancy agreements relieving them of the requirement to pay full business rates.
It can be advantageous for charities to enter such agreements to lease accommodation for charitable uses, for low or nominal rents. They also sometimes receive donations from landlords that reflect a percentage of the business rates saved.
These arrangements can represent a significant risk for charities if they are not making sufficient use of the premises for charitable purposes and become liable for the full business rate.
 

Commission opens Africa Relief Trust business rates inquiry

Finance | Jonathan Last | 26 Jul 2013
http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/assets/images/B-print-20x20.gif http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/assets/images/B-share-20x20.gif http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/assets/images/B-send-20x20.gif
The Charity Commission has opened a statutory inquiry into Africa Relief Trust over its business rates relief arrangements.

The sector regulator understands that the charity has been holding rented properties 'on standby' to be used for raising awareness at an unspecified future time, meanwhile claiming the 80 per cent business rates relief charity properties enjoy.

Africa Relief Trust, which works with poverty, education and sickness in Uganda, was originally the subject of a Commission regulatory compliance case over its rate relief arrangements in September 2011.

As it looked deeper into the situation, the Commission became increasingly concerned about the risks to the charity's assets and about the trustees' failure to provide full and complete information. It opened its inquiry on 12 July 2013.

"The purpose of the inquiry," a Commission spokeswoman said in a statement, "is to examine regulatory concerns including whether the charity trustees have properly discharged their trustee duties when making decisions to enter into tenancy agreements and occupy those properties to further their charitable purposes and whether any benefit to the landlord or other parties is incidental to that."
The Commission spokeswoman added that it will publish a report after its investigation has concluded.  
Anthony Peers, a trustee at Africa Relief Trust, toldcivilsociety.co.uk: "We have been requesting a meeting with the Charity Commission and we've been prepared to travel down to London [from Lancashire] for it.
"Unfortunately, the Commission has changed the meeting date and cancelled on several occasions."

Rate relief a hot issue

Two other registered charities were recently taken to court regarding business rate relief, both adding to the Commission's concerns about Africa Relief Trust.
The Public Safety Charitable Trust was found liable for business rates costs while Kenya Aid Programme awaits an outcome on whether it is liable for rates totalling £1.6m. 

The issue of charities enjoying reduced business rates has also been in the news recently because of
 a consultation on the issue in Wales.
And losing rates relief continues to be one of the major concerns that charity retailers express to Charity Finance's annual Charity Shops Survey, with the issue shooting up the list in this year's edition, out in October.
 
 
Charity Commission opens statutory inquiry into
Africa Relief Trust
25 July 2012
The Charity Commission, the independent regulator of charities in England and Wales has opened a
statutory inquiry into Africa Relief Trust (registered charity 1077946 ).
The Commission opened a regulatory compliance case into the charity in September 2011 after
concerns were raised regarding its business rates relief arrangements. As the case progressed, the
Commission's concerns about the risks to the charity's assets and about the trustees' failure to
provide full and complete information mounted. In addition, two other registered charities were
recently taken to court regarding business rates relief; one was found liable for business rates costs
while the other charity still awaits an outcome on whether it is liable for rates totalling 1.6million .
These verdicts added to the concerns of the Commission and the regulator opened its inquiry on 12
July 2013.
Statutory inquiries are opened to investigate regulatory concerns that the Commission considers the
most serious and allow the use of legal powers, including powers to direct trustees or others.
The purpose of the inquiry is to examine regulatory concerns including whether the charity trustees
have properly discharged their trustee duties when making decisions to enter into tenancy
agreements and occupy those properties to further their charitable purposes and whether any benefit
to the landlord or other parties is incidental to that.
The Commission has issued alerts to charities warning them of the risks associated with business
rates relief.
It is normal practice for the Commission to publish a report after an investigation has concluded.
Reports of previous inquiries by the Commission are available on its website.
Ends
PR 32/13
Notes to Editors
For press enquiries contact pressenquiries@charitycommission.gsi.gov.uk
1. The Charity Commission is the independent regulator of charities in England and Wales. See
www.charitycommission.gov.uk for further information.
2. Our mission is to be the independent registrar and regulator of charities in England and Wales,
acting in the public's interest, to ensure that:
Charity Commission opens statutory inquiry into Africa Relief Trust by Charity Commission - 23/12/2014 14:13:50 Page 2 of 2
 
 
 

Africa Relief Trust criticises regulator for failing to meet before statutory inquiry

14 August 2013 by David Ainsworth, Be the First to Comment

The Charity Commission has opened an inquiry into the charity over its business rates relief arrangements

The Charity Commission has been criticised by Africa Relief Trust for failing to meet it before opening a statutory inquiry.
The commission last month opened an inquiry into the charity, set up to work with poor people in Uganda, over its "business rates relief arrangements".
The commission said it understood the charity had rented properties and kept them on standby to be used for raising charity awareness.
Anthony Peers, a trustee of Art, said in a statement that his charity was legitimately claiming rate relief on empty properties on the basis that when they were next used, they would be put to a charitable use. He said that the Rating (Empty Properties) Act 2007 states that a charity can claim 100 per cent rate relief on empty property if it appears that the next use will be "wholly or mainly" for charitable purposes.
Peers said: "On numerous occasions Art has offered to meet the Charity Commission at its London headquarters but on each occasion it has cancelled, therefore Art has not had an opportunity to explain its actions."
He said trustees of Art "have acted 100 per cent correctly and honestly regarding current rating legislation" and that the properties concerned were "intended for future charitable use by Art and numerous other African charities in a bid to raise funds and hold charity awareness events."
Peers said that Meyrick Gillis, a company that helps property owners reduce the business rates they pay on empty properties, had guaranteed that "any costs relating to non-domestic rates owed will be paid by the company on the charities' behalf" and that "funds are also in place from the company should legal representation be required".
Peers said: "Art has complied with ratings legislation as stated above and therefore should receive 100 per cent mandatory empty property relief until occupation commences, then 80 per cent while in occupation."
The commission is also looking into two other charities over business rates relief arrangements. In June, the regulator opened an inquiry into the Public Safety Charitable Trust after the High Court found that it had not met the rules for charitable occupation. The charity, which was wound up in the High Court last month, now faces a multi-million-pound bill from three local authorities
The other, the Kenya Aid Programme, has been involved in a dispute with Sheffield City Council over £1.6m of unpaid rates.
In both cases the charities have taken over the occupation of privately owned properties and claimed an 80 per cent discount in business rates.
But Peers said that both these charities were claiming rate relief on a different basis to his own organisation.
A spokeswoman for the commission said she did not want to comment on an ongoing inquiry.
 
 
 



__._,_.___

Posted by: Didier IBWILAKWINGI EKOM <d_ibwila@yahoo.fr>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)
The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
When the white man came we had the land and they had the bibles; now they have the land and we have the bibles

----------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaRealities-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaRealities-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaRealities-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-http://www.africarealities.com/

-https://www.facebook.com/africarealities

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-New International Scholarships opportunities: http://www.scholarshipsgate.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Support Our Work Now !

Africa Realities Media is independent. Your support helps us expose injustice, challenge silence and produce evidence-based analysis on Africa and the Great Lakes Region.

Recent Posts

Show more
Africa Realities Media offre un espace aux écrivains, chercheurs, experts, activistes, voix communautaires, militants, analystes et personnes ayant une expérience vécue qui souhaitent contribuer à des contenus réfléchis, responsables et courageux sur les changements nécessaires dans la région des Grands Lacs, ainsi que sur les réalités politiques, économiques, culturelles et sociales africaines souvent ignorées, minimisées ou mal représentées. Nos articles et vidéos visent à ouvrir le débat, renforcer la sensibilisation, encourager la pensée critique et favoriser une réflexion plus profonde sur les réalités vécues par les populations africaines. Nous voulons aider les peuples de la région des Grands Lacs à mieux comprendre leurs droits, notamment leurs droits humains, leur droit au développement, leur droit à la dignité, à la sécurité, au bien-être et à une vie meilleure. À travers nos contenus, nous cherchons également à rappeler aux décideurs, aux institutions publiques, aux acteurs régionaux et internationaux, ainsi qu’aux responsables politiques, leur devoir de transparence, de responsabilité et de redevabilité envers les populations qu’ils prétendent servir. Notre objectif est de contribuer à une culture de vérité, de justice, de participation citoyenne et de protection égale pour tous les peuples africains.

Why We Exist

Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states, ruling elites, armed groups, military forces and security services. But these abuses are often sustained by international silence, Western lobbying, trade interests, migration deals, mineral access, diplomatic partnerships and unequal global accountability. Africa Realities Media exposes that system.

Lived Experience Matters

Survivors, displaced communities, refugees, families affected by repression, journalists, activists, women, young people and diaspora voices are not passive subjects. They are knowledge holders. Their experiences must shape policy, advocacy, journalism and public debate. The people closest to injustice are often closest to the solutions.

Our Principle

Africa Realities Media is rooted in one principle: African lives deserve equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Popular Posts

THE BATTLE OF RUBAYA: Rwanda's War for Minerals Exposed

T he FDLR Pretext Collapses Under the Weight of Documented Plunder   Introduction: A Battle That Tells the Truth When Rwandan-backed RDF/M23 forces fought with extraordinary ferocity to seize and hold Rubaya — a remote mining town in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo — the stated justification was security. Kigali's consistent public line has been that its military presence in the DRC is a response to the threat posed by the Forces Democratiques de Liberation du Rwanda (FDLR), an armed group whose leaders include individuals linked to the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi. This narrative has been accepted, qualified, or left insufficiently challenged by Western governments and multilateral institutions for over a decade. The Battle of Rubaya strips that narrative bare. What unfolded in Rubaya was not a counter-insurgency operation against genocidal remnants. It was a sustained military campaign — reinforced by the Rwanda Defence Forces (RDF), prosecuted at sign...

LA BATAILLE DE RUBAYA : La guerre du Rwanda pour les minerais exposée

Le prétexte des FDLR s’effondre sous le poids du pillage documenté Introduction : une bataille qui dit la vérité Lorsque les forces RDF/M23 soutenues par le Rwanda ont combattu avec une férocité extraordinaire pour s’emparer de Rubaya et la conserver — une ville minière reculée du Nord-Kivu, dans l’est de la République démocratique du Congo — la justification officielle était la sécurité. La ligne publique constante de Kigali a été que sa présence militaire en RDC répond à la menace posée par les Forces démocratiques de libération du Rwanda (FDLR), un groupe armé dont les dirigeants comprennent des individus liés au génocide de 1994 contre les Tutsi. Ce récit a été accepté, nuancé, ou laissé insuffisamment contesté par les gouvernements occidentaux et les institutions multilatérales pendant plus d’une décennie. La bataille de Rubaya met ce récit à nu. Ce qui s’est déroulé à Rubaya n’était pas une opération de contre-insurrection contre des restes génocidaires. C’était une campagne mili...

Les remèdes cosmétiques de la France face à la guerre dans l’est de la RDC

Résolution 2773, Conférence de Paris, doctrine macronienne du dialogue et pari de la Francophonie La politique de la France à l’égard de l’est de la RDC a produit un schéma constant : un langage public fort, une faible application des décisions, aucune pression visible fondée sur les sanctions, et des appels répétés au dialogue qui laissent largement intact le levier militaire et politique du Rwanda. La France ne peut pas rédiger des résolutions, organiser des conférences, rejeter les sanctions, appeler au dialogue, puis revendiquer la neutralité pendant que les civils restent sous occupation, déplacement et violence. Dans une guerre de cette ampleur, le silence et l’inaction ne sont pas neutres. Ce sont des actes politiques. Introduction La France se présente comme l’une des puissances occidentales les plus engagées dans la recherche de la paix dans l’est de la République démocratique du Congo. Elle a parrainé la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies. Elle a organ...

President Macron Against US Sanctions on Rwanda

How France's Interests in Mozambique Obstruct Peace in the DRC A Critical Analysis of Emmanuel Macron's Interview with TV5 Monde, Africa Forward Summit, Nairobi, 12 May 2026 Published by The African Rights Campaign (ARC)   |   London, May 2026   1. Introduction This analysis is based on French President Emmanuel Macron's interview with TV5 Monde, conducted on 12 May 2026 during the Africa Forward Summit in Nairobi, Kenya. In that interview, Macron was asked a direct question: given that Rwanda's support for the M23 armed group has been documented by United Nations experts, and given that the United States has imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force and several of its senior officers, why have France and the European Union declined to do the same? Macron's response was unconvincing, dishonest and analytically incoherent. It revealed not a carefully calibrated position of principled neutrality, but the operational logic of a government that has c...

[AFRICAFORUM] Tr : [hinterland1] Tr : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE

  ----- Mail transféré ----- De : Mpania Jean <drjeanmpania@yahoo.fr> À : Hinterland <hinterland1@yahoogroupes.fr> Envoyé le : Mercredi 26 février 2014 17h13 Objet : [hinterland1] Tr : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE   Le Mercredi 26 février 2014 9h56, congokdp <congokdp@gmail.com> a écrit : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE :   Voici comment les institutions et tout le système de sécurité de la RDC sont sous contrôle du Rwanda et les officiels congolais infiltrés par des «hirondelles» rwandaises! L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE :  Voici comment les institutions et tout le système de sécurité de la RDC sont sous contrôle du Rwanda et les officiels congolais infiltrés par des «hirondelles» rwandaises! Le processus d'occupation de la RDC par le lobby tutsi rwandais passe par le...

The Kagame Myth: Western Power, Private Jets and Rwanda’s Controlled Reality

  ANALYSIS AND INVESTIGATION Introduction: The Myth and the Man Behind the Myth There is a version of Paul Kagame that exists in the conference halls of Davos, in the pages of Western magazines, in private hotel meetings in London, Paris and Washington, and on the sleeves of European football shirts. In this version, Kagame is a visionary. A builder. A disciplined African moderniser. A leader who pulled a broken country from the ashes of genocide and turned it into what admirers often call the “Singapore of Africa”. In this version, Rwanda is clean, efficient, safe, investment-friendly and orderly. Kagame is presented as the African leader the West wants to believe in: controlled, polished, pro-market, security-focused and comfortable in elite Western spaces. Then there is the Rwanda that many Rwandans, exiles, journalists, opposition figures and human rights organisations describe. In this Rwanda, YouTubers and online commentators are jailed for what they say. Critics die in custo...

Dr Phil Clark ( SOAS University of London): A biased lecturer and researcher about African issues.

Dr Phil Clark   was born in Sudan and   is currently   working at SOAS University of London. He is known to be   biased lecturer and researcher about African issues, particularly the Rwandan genocide.     With his poor judgement and analytical thinking, this man only talk about   the results   of events and forget the     root causes. He is a staunch supporter of the criminal, dictator and killer Paul Kagame , the President of   Rwanda. He is singing the song of the winner of the Rwandan  war. He is in the same boat with Linda Melvern, a biased British   freelancer who received a medal from the dictator Paul     Kagame. "> "> Dr.Phil Clark "> Linda Melvern I am asking Dr Phil Clark   one question:   Dear   Dr Phil Clark, What     was the   role of   Paul Kagame and RPF in the Rwandan  massacres and genocide in and outside Rwanda?   Based...

Le Président Macron contre les sanctions américaines imposées au Rwanda

Comment les intérêts français au Mozambique font obstacle à la paix en RDC Analyse critique de l'entretien d'Emmanuel Macron avec TV5 Monde, Africa Forward Summit, Nairobi, 12 mai 2026 Publié par The African Rights Campaign (ARC)   |   Londres, mai 2026     1. Introduction La présente analyse est fondée sur l'entretien accordé par le président français Emmanuel Macron à TV5 Monde, le 12 mai 2026, lors de l'Africa Forward Summit à Nairobi, au Kenya. Au cours de cet entretien, Macron s'est vu poser une question directe : étant donné que le soutien du Rwanda au groupe armé M23 est aujourd'hui documenté par les experts des Nations Unies, et étant donné que les États-Unis ont imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense du Rwanda (FDR) ainsi qu'à plusieurs de leurs hauts responsables, pourquoi la France et l'Union européenne n'ont-elles pas fait de même ? La réponse de Macron s'est révélée peu convaincante, malhonnête et analytique...

Kagame’s Image Machine: Who Profits While Rwanda Stays Poor

I nvestigation:  Paying to Stay Poor: How Western PR Firms, Lobbyists, Sports Clubs and Media Outlets Profit from Rwanda’s Image Economy Introduction: An Ecosystem of Paid Influence Rwanda is often presented internationally as a model of discipline, security, investment promotion and post-genocide recovery. That image has been carefully built, repeatedly amplified and professionally protected. Behind it sits a costly international network of sports sponsorships, lobbying contracts, public relations firms, legal consultancy, political access, favourable media relationships and diplomatic narrative management. The moral problem is clear. Rwanda remains heavily dependent on foreign aid and external financing. According to World Bank-linked data, foreign aid received by Rwanda reached approximately 1.39 billion US dollars in 2023. UNDP’s 2025 Human Development Report gives Rwanda a Human Development Index value of 0.578 for 2023, placing it 159th out of 193 countries and territories. U...

Justice ou théâtre politique ? Les procès français du génocide rwandais et le travail inachevé de la réconciliation entre Rwandais

Introduction Depuis 2014, les tribunaux français ont poursuivi une série de ressortissants rwandais hutu pour leur rôle présumé dans le génocide de 1994 contre les Tutsi. Le premier procès, celui de l’ancien chef du renseignement Pascal Simbikangwa, a été suivi par les condamnations des anciens bourgmestres Octavien Ngenzi et Tito Barahira en 2016, puis par la condamnation, en 2023, de l’ancien officier de gendarmerie Philippe Hategekimana. Aucun accusé jugé en France, au titre de la compétence universelle, pour le génocide rwandais n’a été acquitté. D’autres poursuites devraient suivre. Ces procédures ont été largement saluées comme la preuve que la France affronte enfin son passé d’État ayant protégé des auteurs présumés du génocide sur son territoire. Des organisations internationales de défense des droits humains, des spécialistes du génocide et une partie de la société civile française les ont présentées comme une contribution tardive, mais bienvenue, à la lutte mondiale contre l’...

Why Africa Realities Media Is Different

Africa Realities Media speaks to Africa and to the developed world. Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states and ruling elites, but they are often protected by international silence, lobbying, public relations, trade interests, migration deals and unequal global accountability. While governments pay lobbyists to present a good image abroad, ordinary African people continue to face violence, hunger, disease, poverty, repression and exclusion. We challenge the normalisation of African suffering and demand equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Pourquoi Africa Realities Media est différent?

Africa Realities Media s’adresse à l’Afrique et au monde développé. De nombreux abus subis par les peuples africains sont commis par des États africains et des élites dirigeantes, mais ils sont souvent protégés par le silence international, le lobbying, les relations publiques, les intérêts commerciaux, les accords migratoires et une responsabilité mondiale inégale. Tandis que des gouvernements paient des lobbyistes pour présenter une bonne image à l’étranger, des Africains ordinaires continuent de faire face à la violence, à la faim, aux maladies, à la pauvreté, à la répression et à l’exclusion. Nous contestons la normalisation de la souffrance africaine et exigeons une vérité égale, une justice égale et une protection égale.

BBC News

Policy and Systems Change

Our work is designed to trigger debate, discomfort and action. We do not only expose injustice; we work for policy and systems change. We want governments and institutions to address the root causes of inequality, disadvantage, discrimination, exclusion and barriers affecting African people. We believe lasting change must be shaped by people with lived experience.

Exposing Injustice in Africa

Africa Realities Media is an independent African accountability platform based in London. We report, analyse and challenge the systems that shape African suffering, silence African victims and protect abusive power. We are not here to repeat diplomatic language. We are here to ask the questions that are often avoided: why are African deaths treated as normal? Why are African victims given less urgency? Why are governments that imprison, exclude, displace or kill their own people protected when they serve powerful international interests?

Africanews

Africa Realities Media gives space to writers, researchers, experts, activists, community voices, campaigners, analysts and people with lived experience who want to contribute thoughtful, responsible and courageous content about the changes needed in the region, as well as the political, economic, cultural and social African realities that are often ignored, minimised or misrepresented. Our articles and videos aim to encourage debate, raise awareness, stimulate critical thinking and support reflection. We seek to help people in the Great Lakes Region understand their rights to human rights, development and wellbeing, while also encouraging decision-makers to be more transparent, responsive and accountable.

Appel à contributions

Sensibilisez le public aux causes qui vous tiennent à cÅ“ur. Prenez part au changement que vous souhaitez voir émerger. Aidez à combattre l’injustice partout où elle se manifeste.

Africa Realities Media accueille des articles originaux, analyses, tribunes, réflexions communautaires et commentaires fondés sur des faits concernant la région des Grands Lacs africains, ainsi que les questions liées à la justice, aux droits humains, à la gouvernance, aux conflits, à la paix, aux réfugiés, aux ressources naturelles et à la responsabilité publique en Afrique.

Nous accueillons également les annonces concernant de nouvelles ou d’anciennes publications liées à nos domaines d’intérêt. Vous pouvez annoncer gratuitement votre publication, notamment un livre, un rapport, une étude, un article académique ou tout autre travail pertinent.

Les articles doivent être rédigés en anglais ou en français et ne doivent pas dépasser 1 500 mots.

Veuillez inclure le nom complet de l’auteur, qui sera publié avec l’article s’il est accepté.

Avant de soumettre votre article, veuillez d’abord lire nos pages du site web afin de vérifier si votre article correspond à nos priorités éditoriales, à nos thèmes et à nos domaines d’intérêt.

Si vous avez un article, un commentaire ou une annonce de publication à partager avec un public plus large, veuillez l’envoyer par email à :

africarealitiesmedia@gmail.com

Nous étudierons la possibilité de publier gratuitement les articles et annonces de publications appropriés s’ils répondent à nos critères éditoriaux, notamment la pertinence, la clarté, l’originalité, l’intérêt public, le respect des communautés concernées et l’utilisation responsable des informations et des preuves.

Les articles sont publiés tels qu’ils sont soumis s’ils répondent à nos critères et à notre politique éditoriale. Nous ne procédons pas à une modification supplémentaire de votre article avant sa publication.