Skip to main content

Latest Analysis

Independent analysis, commentary and investigations on Africa, the Great Lakes Region and international accountability.

[RwandaLibre] Kagame & His Enemies.

 

President Kagame of Rwanda and His Enemies

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach
04/28/14 08:33 AM ET

Wow. That was quick.
No sooner had I returned from the twentieth anniversary commemorations
of the Rwandan genocide in Kigali than I saw Howard French's assault
on the man universally credited with stopping the mass killings,
President Paul Kagame. I would have welcomed discussing French's
allegations against Kagame directly but could not find him among the
hundreds of international dignitaries and heads of State who set aside
time in their busy schedules to pay their respects by traveling across
the world to honor the dead.

In his Wall Street Journal
op-ed ("How Rwanda's Paul Kagame Exploits U.S. Guilt", 19 April 2014)
French re-roasts old chestnuts against the Rwandan leader bringing us
an unoriginal rehash of all the Monday-morning quarterbacks convinced
they could have done a much better job of bringing Rwanda back from
the brink after the fastest mass murder in history, claiming the lives
of 10,000 people each day, 400 per hour, and 7 each minute.

The genocide of the Tutsi in Rwanda was not tribal violence. Less so
was it a civil war. Rather, it was an orchestrated project by
extremists in power who were motivated by a deeply racist ideology.
The Hutu may have been willing instruments of the genocide but they
were tools in the hands of a Rwandan government who wished to see all
complicit so that none could be tried.

I am mystified by French's efforts to obscure these truths and, as Jew
who has watched the growing trend of holocaust denial, I am even more
troubled. When I was in Kigali I told President Kagame that if he was
not careful in ten years time the world would say there was no
genocide but merely ethnic strife. He responded, "Ten years? It's
happening already today." As outrageous as it would be to describe the
Armenian, Cambodian, Jewish, or Bosnian genocides as occurring without
agency, the Rwandan genocide is no different. There were good guys and
really, really evil guys. Kagame is the acknowledged hero of the plot.

French contends that American guilt over its inaction to stop the
genocide causes our government today to overlook alleged crimes of the
Kagame government. That may be so, although you would be hard-pressed
to make the case that the Obama Administration refuses to, say, call
for an international indictment against Bashar Al-Assad for gassing
children because the United States still feels guilty that it did not
stop his father from crushing 30,000 people to death in Hama.

Might it not occur to French that the reason the United States is very
friendly toward Rwanda - amid the substantive disagreements and
criticisms that occur between any two nations - is because they are
amazed that in a continent marked by war, starvation, and corruption
Rwanda has the fastest growing economy, the highest immunization
rates, a celebrated war on corruption and, as any visitor can witness,
is a model for racial harmony and integration?

While traveling through Rwanda I was amazed to see the entire country
shut down at 2pm each day during the annual genocide remembrance week,
to sit outdoors in groups of a few hundred to talk through ethnic
differences and foster reconciliation so that such violence never
repeats itself. I have never seen anything of its kind, not even in
Israel or the United States.

French is a downer, a profound cynic and pessimist whose prejudices
against Kagame would deny him even this astonishing achievement. In a
world filled with mass murderers like Bashar Assad and Kim Jong Un,
who continues to starve his people to death, French eviscerates any
pretension to objectivity when he says, quoting a Belgian scholar,
that Kagame is "probably the worst war criminal in office today." But
any objective observer of the country, who drives through the pristine
and immaculate roads of Rwanda, will conclude that Kagame has exceeded
any expectation the world would have had for a country who in 1994 had
so many bodies in its rivers that the waters actually ceased to flow.

That is not to say the President is perfect. He most assuredly is not,
words that I said to him in his presence and in front of 20,000 people
in my nationally-televised address at the Rwanda 20th Commemoration.
It is to say that before we hurl accusations against a man who
witnessed the world's abandonment of his people to machetes and axes,
we ought to be somewhat understanding of his aggressive security
policies that ensure his people are never subject to extermination
again. As Yogi Berra famously said, "Just because you're paranoid
doesn't mean they're not out to get you."

Writers like French find it easy to condemn countries like Rwanda or
Israel for taking the fight to their enemies rather than continuing to
be sitting ducks. Would French really advise Kagame to leave the
murderers who perpetrated the genocide right on his border in Congo?
Would he tell Kagame to rely on international assurances and the
United Nations to protect his people, the same UN that categorically
refused to allow its commander, General Romeo Dallaire, to disarm the
Hutu militias and who evacuated most of its peace-keepers just as soon
as the genocide began.

I claim no expertise in the ongoing travails of Congo. But French
loses all credibility when he lays all the country' suffering at
Rwanda's door. Every lay person knows that Congo, well before Rwanda's
incursion, was ruled by a ruthless dictator named Mobutu Sese Seko. We
know this because he bankrolled the Muhammad Ali-George Foreman
"Rumble in the Jungle" at a time when Congo was formerly known as
Zaire. Mobuto was a violent autocrat who ran a kleptocracy, amassing
vast personal wealth, and was seen as an archetypal African dictator.
After the Tutsi genocide, the main body of perpetrators fled to, and
were granted, sanctuary, in Congo.

Surely even the biggest critic would cut Kagame some slack when they
imagine some two million Rwandan refugees still camped across the
border under the command and control of the former genocidal
government. Congo's government openly collaborated with the FDLR and
other remnants of the forces responsible for the genocide. These
forces are on the U.S. terror list and are held responsible by many
for the epidemic of sexual assault in eastern Congo. But French has
nothing negative to say about them.

Most venomous of all is French's assertion that Rwanda's incursions
into Congo was the result of "Rwanda's pursuit of coldblooded ethnic
revenge." Such unsubstantiated conjecture would turn the tables and
make the man who stopped the genocide, Paul Kagame, into the only true
génocidaire and reminds me of former Pink Floyd front man Roger
Water's claim that Israel is now the Nazis.

French wishes his readers to believe that the current Rwandan
government is just as guilty of "genocide" as its predecessor, making
victims into villains. This unfortunate moral equivalence is something
of which we Jews have learned all too well as Israel is regularly and
falsely accused of being an apartheid state, even as it affords its
1.5 million Arab citizens equal rights to every Israeli and more
rights than any Arab nation on earth.

French has no choice but to admit strong gains in all human
development indicators in Rwanda under Kagame's leadership but cannot
suppress his ultimate dismissal of these as irrelevant. But let us
recall that the Kagame's renaissance in Rwanda - evident to any
visitor to the country - is mostly benefiting the majority Hutu
population. Rwanda's rise from Armageddon - including its reduction of
international aid to just 40 percent of their budget, as French
himself acknowledges - speaks for itself and cannot be debunked even
by one-sided commentators like French.

Legitimate criticism of the Rwanda government is important and must be
both aired and addressed. The US government is pressing President
Kagame for greater press freedoms and greater political opposition.
There are further troubling allegations of select opposition leaders
and even journalists who have been murdered. Kagame's defenders argue
that there is no evidence linking his government with these deaths.

I raised these subjects with President Kagame on more than one
occasion. I told him that as the only man alive to have stopped a
genocide he is a hero to me and countless millions the world over. He
must remain so and make morality and democracy the cornerstone of his
policies amid the legitimate need to protect his people against so
many that wish them harm. A man whose country has suffered
indiscriminate slaughter has a special responsibility to uphold human
rights and stop all abuse.

But the US lecturing Kagame would no doubt carry more weight if Rwanda
did not feel itself being subject to double standards, as the world's
sole superpower pursues a policy of inaction in Syria, North Korea,
and the Central African Republic where millions continue to die with
barely an American objection.

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, whom Newsweek and The Washington Post calls
"the most famous Rabbi in America," is the winner of The London Times
Preacher of the Year Award and is the recipient of the American Jewish
Press Association's Highest Award for Excellence in Commentary. The
international best-selling author of 30 books, in May he will publish
"Kosher Lust: Love is Not the Answer."

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5225558

--
SIBOMANA Jean Bosco
Google+: https://plus.google.com/110493390983174363421/posts
YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9B4024D0AE764F3D
http://www.youtube.com/user/sibomanaxyz999
***Online Time:15H30-20H30, heure de Montréal.***Fuseau horaire
domestique: heure normale de la côte Est des Etats-Unis et Canada
(GMT-05:00)***

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
.To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to:
RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
_____________________________________________________

More news:  http://www.amakurunamateka.com ; http://www.ikangurambaga.com ; http://rwandalibre.blogspot.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-SVP, considérer  environnement   avant toute  impression de  cet e-mail ou les pièces jointes.
======
-Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sponsors:

http://www.afriqueintimites.com; http://www.afriqueintimites.com;
http://www.eyumbina.com/; http://www.foraha.net/
-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-
.

__,_._,___

Comments

Support Our Work Now !

Africa Realities Media is independent. Your support helps us expose injustice, challenge silence and produce evidence-based analysis on Africa and the Great Lakes Region.

Recent Posts

Show more
Africa Realities Media offre un espace aux écrivains, chercheurs, experts, activistes, voix communautaires, militants, analystes et personnes ayant une expérience vécue qui souhaitent contribuer à des contenus réfléchis, responsables et courageux sur les changements nécessaires dans la région des Grands Lacs, ainsi que sur les réalités politiques, économiques, culturelles et sociales africaines souvent ignorées, minimisées ou mal représentées. Nos articles et vidéos visent à ouvrir le débat, renforcer la sensibilisation, encourager la pensée critique et favoriser une réflexion plus profonde sur les réalités vécues par les populations africaines. Nous voulons aider les peuples de la région des Grands Lacs à mieux comprendre leurs droits, notamment leurs droits humains, leur droit au développement, leur droit à la dignité, à la sécurité, au bien-être et à une vie meilleure. À travers nos contenus, nous cherchons également à rappeler aux décideurs, aux institutions publiques, aux acteurs régionaux et internationaux, ainsi qu’aux responsables politiques, leur devoir de transparence, de responsabilité et de redevabilité envers les populations qu’ils prétendent servir. Notre objectif est de contribuer à une culture de vérité, de justice, de participation citoyenne et de protection égale pour tous les peuples africains.

Why We Exist

Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states, ruling elites, armed groups, military forces and security services. But these abuses are often sustained by international silence, Western lobbying, trade interests, migration deals, mineral access, diplomatic partnerships and unequal global accountability. Africa Realities Media exposes that system.

Lived Experience Matters

Survivors, displaced communities, refugees, families affected by repression, journalists, activists, women, young people and diaspora voices are not passive subjects. They are knowledge holders. Their experiences must shape policy, advocacy, journalism and public debate. The people closest to injustice are often closest to the solutions.

Our Principle

Africa Realities Media is rooted in one principle: African lives deserve equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Popular Posts

THE BATTLE OF RUBAYA: Rwanda's War for Minerals Exposed

T he FDLR Pretext Collapses Under the Weight of Documented Plunder   Introduction: A Battle That Tells the Truth When Rwandan-backed RDF/M23 forces fought with extraordinary ferocity to seize and hold Rubaya — a remote mining town in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo — the stated justification was security. Kigali's consistent public line has been that its military presence in the DRC is a response to the threat posed by the Forces Democratiques de Liberation du Rwanda (FDLR), an armed group whose leaders include individuals linked to the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi. This narrative has been accepted, qualified, or left insufficiently challenged by Western governments and multilateral institutions for over a decade. The Battle of Rubaya strips that narrative bare. What unfolded in Rubaya was not a counter-insurgency operation against genocidal remnants. It was a sustained military campaign — reinforced by the Rwanda Defence Forces (RDF), prosecuted at sign...

LA BATAILLE DE RUBAYA : La guerre du Rwanda pour les minerais exposée

Le prétexte des FDLR s’effondre sous le poids du pillage documenté Introduction : une bataille qui dit la vérité Lorsque les forces RDF/M23 soutenues par le Rwanda ont combattu avec une férocité extraordinaire pour s’emparer de Rubaya et la conserver — une ville minière reculée du Nord-Kivu, dans l’est de la République démocratique du Congo — la justification officielle était la sécurité. La ligne publique constante de Kigali a été que sa présence militaire en RDC répond à la menace posée par les Forces démocratiques de libération du Rwanda (FDLR), un groupe armé dont les dirigeants comprennent des individus liés au génocide de 1994 contre les Tutsi. Ce récit a été accepté, nuancé, ou laissé insuffisamment contesté par les gouvernements occidentaux et les institutions multilatérales pendant plus d’une décennie. La bataille de Rubaya met ce récit à nu. Ce qui s’est déroulé à Rubaya n’était pas une opération de contre-insurrection contre des restes génocidaires. C’était une campagne mili...

Les remèdes cosmétiques de la France face à la guerre dans l’est de la RDC

Résolution 2773, Conférence de Paris, doctrine macronienne du dialogue et pari de la Francophonie La politique de la France à l’égard de l’est de la RDC a produit un schéma constant : un langage public fort, une faible application des décisions, aucune pression visible fondée sur les sanctions, et des appels répétés au dialogue qui laissent largement intact le levier militaire et politique du Rwanda. La France ne peut pas rédiger des résolutions, organiser des conférences, rejeter les sanctions, appeler au dialogue, puis revendiquer la neutralité pendant que les civils restent sous occupation, déplacement et violence. Dans une guerre de cette ampleur, le silence et l’inaction ne sont pas neutres. Ce sont des actes politiques. Introduction La France se présente comme l’une des puissances occidentales les plus engagées dans la recherche de la paix dans l’est de la République démocratique du Congo. Elle a parrainé la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies. Elle a organ...

President Macron Against US Sanctions on Rwanda

How France's Interests in Mozambique Obstruct Peace in the DRC A Critical Analysis of Emmanuel Macron's Interview with TV5 Monde, Africa Forward Summit, Nairobi, 12 May 2026 Published by The African Rights Campaign (ARC)   |   London, May 2026   1. Introduction This analysis is based on French President Emmanuel Macron's interview with TV5 Monde, conducted on 12 May 2026 during the Africa Forward Summit in Nairobi, Kenya. In that interview, Macron was asked a direct question: given that Rwanda's support for the M23 armed group has been documented by United Nations experts, and given that the United States has imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force and several of its senior officers, why have France and the European Union declined to do the same? Macron's response was unconvincing, dishonest and analytically incoherent. It revealed not a carefully calibrated position of principled neutrality, but the operational logic of a government that has c...

[AFRICAFORUM] Tr : [hinterland1] Tr : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE

  ----- Mail transféré ----- De : Mpania Jean <drjeanmpania@yahoo.fr> À : Hinterland <hinterland1@yahoogroupes.fr> Envoyé le : Mercredi 26 février 2014 17h13 Objet : [hinterland1] Tr : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE   Le Mercredi 26 février 2014 9h56, congokdp <congokdp@gmail.com> a écrit : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE :   Voici comment les institutions et tout le système de sécurité de la RDC sont sous contrôle du Rwanda et les officiels congolais infiltrés par des «hirondelles» rwandaises! L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE :  Voici comment les institutions et tout le système de sécurité de la RDC sont sous contrôle du Rwanda et les officiels congolais infiltrés par des «hirondelles» rwandaises! Le processus d'occupation de la RDC par le lobby tutsi rwandais passe par le...

The Kagame Myth: Western Power, Private Jets and Rwanda’s Controlled Reality

  ANALYSIS AND INVESTIGATION Introduction: The Myth and the Man Behind the Myth There is a version of Paul Kagame that exists in the conference halls of Davos, in the pages of Western magazines, in private hotel meetings in London, Paris and Washington, and on the sleeves of European football shirts. In this version, Kagame is a visionary. A builder. A disciplined African moderniser. A leader who pulled a broken country from the ashes of genocide and turned it into what admirers often call the “Singapore of Africa”. In this version, Rwanda is clean, efficient, safe, investment-friendly and orderly. Kagame is presented as the African leader the West wants to believe in: controlled, polished, pro-market, security-focused and comfortable in elite Western spaces. Then there is the Rwanda that many Rwandans, exiles, journalists, opposition figures and human rights organisations describe. In this Rwanda, YouTubers and online commentators are jailed for what they say. Critics die in custo...

Dr Phil Clark ( SOAS University of London): A biased lecturer and researcher about African issues.

Dr Phil Clark   was born in Sudan and   is currently   working at SOAS University of London. He is known to be   biased lecturer and researcher about African issues, particularly the Rwandan genocide.     With his poor judgement and analytical thinking, this man only talk about   the results   of events and forget the     root causes. He is a staunch supporter of the criminal, dictator and killer Paul Kagame , the President of   Rwanda. He is singing the song of the winner of the Rwandan  war. He is in the same boat with Linda Melvern, a biased British   freelancer who received a medal from the dictator Paul     Kagame. "> "> Dr.Phil Clark "> Linda Melvern I am asking Dr Phil Clark   one question:   Dear   Dr Phil Clark, What     was the   role of   Paul Kagame and RPF in the Rwandan  massacres and genocide in and outside Rwanda?   Based...

Le Président Macron contre les sanctions américaines imposées au Rwanda

Comment les intérêts français au Mozambique font obstacle à la paix en RDC Analyse critique de l'entretien d'Emmanuel Macron avec TV5 Monde, Africa Forward Summit, Nairobi, 12 mai 2026 Publié par The African Rights Campaign (ARC)   |   Londres, mai 2026     1. Introduction La présente analyse est fondée sur l'entretien accordé par le président français Emmanuel Macron à TV5 Monde, le 12 mai 2026, lors de l'Africa Forward Summit à Nairobi, au Kenya. Au cours de cet entretien, Macron s'est vu poser une question directe : étant donné que le soutien du Rwanda au groupe armé M23 est aujourd'hui documenté par les experts des Nations Unies, et étant donné que les États-Unis ont imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense du Rwanda (FDR) ainsi qu'à plusieurs de leurs hauts responsables, pourquoi la France et l'Union européenne n'ont-elles pas fait de même ? La réponse de Macron s'est révélée peu convaincante, malhonnête et analytique...

Kagame’s Image Machine: Who Profits While Rwanda Stays Poor

I nvestigation:  Paying to Stay Poor: How Western PR Firms, Lobbyists, Sports Clubs and Media Outlets Profit from Rwanda’s Image Economy Introduction: An Ecosystem of Paid Influence Rwanda is often presented internationally as a model of discipline, security, investment promotion and post-genocide recovery. That image has been carefully built, repeatedly amplified and professionally protected. Behind it sits a costly international network of sports sponsorships, lobbying contracts, public relations firms, legal consultancy, political access, favourable media relationships and diplomatic narrative management. The moral problem is clear. Rwanda remains heavily dependent on foreign aid and external financing. According to World Bank-linked data, foreign aid received by Rwanda reached approximately 1.39 billion US dollars in 2023. UNDP’s 2025 Human Development Report gives Rwanda a Human Development Index value of 0.578 for 2023, placing it 159th out of 193 countries and territories. U...

Justice ou théâtre politique ? Les procès français du génocide rwandais et le travail inachevé de la réconciliation entre Rwandais

Introduction Depuis 2014, les tribunaux français ont poursuivi une série de ressortissants rwandais hutu pour leur rôle présumé dans le génocide de 1994 contre les Tutsi. Le premier procès, celui de l’ancien chef du renseignement Pascal Simbikangwa, a été suivi par les condamnations des anciens bourgmestres Octavien Ngenzi et Tito Barahira en 2016, puis par la condamnation, en 2023, de l’ancien officier de gendarmerie Philippe Hategekimana. Aucun accusé jugé en France, au titre de la compétence universelle, pour le génocide rwandais n’a été acquitté. D’autres poursuites devraient suivre. Ces procédures ont été largement saluées comme la preuve que la France affronte enfin son passé d’État ayant protégé des auteurs présumés du génocide sur son territoire. Des organisations internationales de défense des droits humains, des spécialistes du génocide et une partie de la société civile française les ont présentées comme une contribution tardive, mais bienvenue, à la lutte mondiale contre l’...

Why Africa Realities Media Is Different

Africa Realities Media speaks to Africa and to the developed world. Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states and ruling elites, but they are often protected by international silence, lobbying, public relations, trade interests, migration deals and unequal global accountability. While governments pay lobbyists to present a good image abroad, ordinary African people continue to face violence, hunger, disease, poverty, repression and exclusion. We challenge the normalisation of African suffering and demand equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Pourquoi Africa Realities Media est différent?

Africa Realities Media s’adresse à l’Afrique et au monde développé. De nombreux abus subis par les peuples africains sont commis par des États africains et des élites dirigeantes, mais ils sont souvent protégés par le silence international, le lobbying, les relations publiques, les intérêts commerciaux, les accords migratoires et une responsabilité mondiale inégale. Tandis que des gouvernements paient des lobbyistes pour présenter une bonne image à l’étranger, des Africains ordinaires continuent de faire face à la violence, à la faim, aux maladies, à la pauvreté, à la répression et à l’exclusion. Nous contestons la normalisation de la souffrance africaine et exigeons une vérité égale, une justice égale et une protection égale.

BBC News

Policy and Systems Change

Our work is designed to trigger debate, discomfort and action. We do not only expose injustice; we work for policy and systems change. We want governments and institutions to address the root causes of inequality, disadvantage, discrimination, exclusion and barriers affecting African people. We believe lasting change must be shaped by people with lived experience.

Exposing Injustice in Africa

Africa Realities Media is an independent African accountability platform based in London. We report, analyse and challenge the systems that shape African suffering, silence African victims and protect abusive power. We are not here to repeat diplomatic language. We are here to ask the questions that are often avoided: why are African deaths treated as normal? Why are African victims given less urgency? Why are governments that imprison, exclude, displace or kill their own people protected when they serve powerful international interests?

Africanews

Africa Realities Media gives space to writers, researchers, experts, activists, community voices, campaigners, analysts and people with lived experience who want to contribute thoughtful, responsible and courageous content about the changes needed in the region, as well as the political, economic, cultural and social African realities that are often ignored, minimised or misrepresented. Our articles and videos aim to encourage debate, raise awareness, stimulate critical thinking and support reflection. We seek to help people in the Great Lakes Region understand their rights to human rights, development and wellbeing, while also encouraging decision-makers to be more transparent, responsive and accountable.

Appel à contributions

Sensibilisez le public aux causes qui vous tiennent à cÅ“ur. Prenez part au changement que vous souhaitez voir émerger. Aidez à combattre l’injustice partout où elle se manifeste.

Africa Realities Media accueille des articles originaux, analyses, tribunes, réflexions communautaires et commentaires fondés sur des faits concernant la région des Grands Lacs africains, ainsi que les questions liées à la justice, aux droits humains, à la gouvernance, aux conflits, à la paix, aux réfugiés, aux ressources naturelles et à la responsabilité publique en Afrique.

Nous accueillons également les annonces concernant de nouvelles ou d’anciennes publications liées à nos domaines d’intérêt. Vous pouvez annoncer gratuitement votre publication, notamment un livre, un rapport, une étude, un article académique ou tout autre travail pertinent.

Les articles doivent être rédigés en anglais ou en français et ne doivent pas dépasser 1 500 mots.

Veuillez inclure le nom complet de l’auteur, qui sera publié avec l’article s’il est accepté.

Avant de soumettre votre article, veuillez d’abord lire nos pages du site web afin de vérifier si votre article correspond à nos priorités éditoriales, à nos thèmes et à nos domaines d’intérêt.

Si vous avez un article, un commentaire ou une annonce de publication à partager avec un public plus large, veuillez l’envoyer par email à :

africarealitiesmedia@gmail.com

Nous étudierons la possibilité de publier gratuitement les articles et annonces de publications appropriés s’ils répondent à nos critères éditoriaux, notamment la pertinence, la clarté, l’originalité, l’intérêt public, le respect des communautés concernées et l’utilisation responsable des informations et des preuves.

Les articles sont publiés tels qu’ils sont soumis s’ils répondent à nos critères et à notre politique éditoriale. Nous ne procédons pas à une modification supplémentaire de votre article avant sa publication.