Skip to main content

Latest Analysis

Independent analysis, commentary and investigations on Africa, the Great Lakes Region and international accountability.

Human Rights Watch exposes M23 rebel group’s notoriousness of killing and raping innocent civilians in DR Congo


Human Rights Watch exposes M23 rebel group's notoriousness of killing and raping innocent civilians in DR Congo

Evidences proving Rwanda's Support for M23 Rebels.
President Kagame's proxy rebel group M23 has continued perpetuating atrocities against innocent civilians in DR Congo
By Gasasira, Sweden
Human Rights watch yesterday issued a report which exposed M23 rebel group's notoriousness of killing and raping innocent civilians in DR Congo . In it's report it gave details of terrorising crimes committed by M23 rebels which have killed more than 44 innocent civilians and raped 61 women and girls since March 2013 in the war torn zone of eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Human Rights Watch further continued on by revealing the way local residents and M23 rebel deserters reported recent forced recruitment of men and boys by M23 rebels in both Rwanda and Congo.
After a nearly two-month-long ceasefire, fighting resumed on July 14 between the Congolese armed forces and M23 rebels near the eastern city of Goma.
Residents and rebel deserters described recent support from within Rwanda to the abusive M23 forces. This includes regular movements from Rwanda into Congo of men in Rwandan army uniforms, and the provision of ammunition, food, and other supplies from Rwanda to the M23. The M23 has been recruiting inside Rwanda. Rwandan military officers have trained new M23 recruits, and have communicated and met with M23 leaders on several occasions.
Africa director at Human Rights Watch Daniel Bekele said this "Not only is Rwanda allowing its territory to be used by the abusive M23 to get recruits and equipment, but the Rwandan military is still directly supporting the M23," He continued "Among those support is sustaining an armed group responsible for numerous killings, rapes and other serious abuses."
The latest Human Rights Watch findings are based on more than 100 interviews since March, including with former M23 fighters who left the movement between late March and July and civilians living near the Congo-Rwanda border, some of whom were victims of abuses.
In addition to M23 abuses, Human Rights Watch documented several cases of killings and rapes by Congolese Hutu militia groups operating in and around M23-controlled territory. Some Congolese army officers have allegedly supported factions of these groups, as well as factions of the allied Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) – a largely Rwandan Hutu armed group, some of whose members participated in the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.
Since its inception in April 2012, the M23 has committed widespread violations of the laws of war. Despite numerous war crimes by M23 fighters, the armed group has received significant support from Rwandan military officials. After briefly occupying Goma in November, then withdrawing on December 1, the M23 controls much of Congo's Rutshuru and Nyiragongo territories, bordering Rwanda.
On April 25 and 26, M23 fighters killed 15 ethnic Hutu civilians in several villages in Busanza groupement in Rutshuru territory, and at least another 6 in mid-June, in an apparent attempt to "punish" villagers for alleged collaboration with Congolese Hutu militias.
Other civilians killed by M23 fighters since March include a 62-year-old man who was shot dead because he refused to hand his sons over to the M23, a motorcycle driver who refused to give money to the M23, M23 recruits who were caught after trying to escape, and others accused of collaborating with Hutu militia.
On July 5, four M23 fighters gang-raped a 12-year-old girl as she went to fetch water in her village in Rutshuru. An M23 fighter who accosted an 18-year-old woman near Bunagana shot her in the leg on April 15 when she refused to have sex with him.
Since June, M23 leaders have forced local chiefs in areas under their control to undergo military and ideological training and obtain recruits for the M23. The M23 considers these chiefs to be part of their "reserve force" that can be called upon to provide support during military operations.
M23 fighters have arrested or abducted dozens of civilians in recent weeks in Rutshuru, most of them Hutu. The M23 accused many of them of collaborating with the FDLR or allied Congolese Hutu militias. M23 fighters beat them severely, tied them up, and detained them. The M23 then forced many of them to undergo military training and become M23 fighters.
A former M23 police officer, who deserted in April, told Human Rights Watch that he participated in investigations of killings of civilians. He said that before each investigation, a high-ranking M23 commander, Innocent Kayna, told him: "You will do the investigation. You will say it's bandits in the neighborhood who killed, not M23."
Human Rights Watch contacted the M23's military leader, Sultani Makenga, but he was unavailable to speak about the recent alleged abuses.
Those recruited in Rwanda into the M23 include demobilized Rwandan army soldiers and former FDLR fighters, most of whom had become part of the Rwandan army's Reserve Force, as well as Rwandan civilians. A 15-year-old Rwandan boy told Human Rights Watch that he and three other young men and boys were promised jobs as cow herders in Congo, but when they got to Congo were forced to join the M23. They were given military training by Rwandan officers in Congo and told they would be killed if they tried to escape. Other M23 deserters also said Rwandan officers were training new M23 recruits.
Former M23 officers who had been part of previous Rwanda-backed rebellions said they recognized officers serving with the M23 who they knew were members of the Rwandan army. Congolese deserters told Human Rights Watch that a number of M23 fighters admitted freely that they were Rwandan. Some said they had served in the Rwandan army's peacekeeping contingent in Darfur.
Recent M23 deserters interviewed by Human Rights Watch described frequent – in some cases weekly – arrivals of soldiers and recruits from Rwanda. Sometimes these were rotations, with new soldiers replacing others who had returned to Rwanda. Weapons, ammunition, large containers of milk, truckloads of rice, and other supplies were brought to the M23 from Rwanda. M23 deserters also described phone conversations and meetings in both Rwanda and Congo between senior M23 leaders and people the deserters were told or knew to be Rwandan officials.
All of the recent M23 deserters interviewed by Human Rights Watch said that Rwandan soldiers, officers, and trainers were present throughout their time with the M23, and that there had been new arrivals from Rwanda in recent months.
Africa director at Human Rights Watch, Daniel Bakele said this "For the past 17 years, the Rwandan army has repeatedly deployed troops to eastern Congo and backed abusive proxy forces responsible for war crimes,". He continued "As in the past, Rwanda denies it's supporting the M23, but the facts on the ground speak for themselves." un quote him
Even though Rwandan officials in the past have repeatedly denied allegations that the government is providing support to the M23 but the Rwandan government and military officials shied away and opted to did not respond to Human Rights Watch's requests for a meeting.
Human Rights Watch warned the Rwandan government to immediately halt all support to the M23 because of its broadly abusive behavior and urged the United Nations and United States special envoys for the Great Lakes region and donor governments to publicly denounce continuing Rwandan support to the M23 and call for sanctions against senior Rwandan officials responsible for backing the armed group.
Human Rights Watch also urged the Congolese government to immediately suspend, investigate, and prosecute as appropriate Congolese military officers and government officials who have provided support to the FDLR or allied groups. The government should make clear that abusive militia commanders will not be integrated into Congo's army as part of any political settlement.
According to international journalists present near the front line and photographs seen by Human Rights Watch, Congolese army soldiers treated the corpses of M23 fighters killed in combat on July 16 in a degrading manner, stripping them, making ethnic slurs, and prodding their genitals with weapons. International law prohibits "committing outrages upon personal dignity," including against the dead. Human Rights Watch also documented cases in which the Congolese army detained former M23 fighters and alleged collaborators for several weeks without bringing them before a court, and often incommunicado and in harsh conditions.
Human Rights Watch urged Congolese military officials to appropriately discipline officers and soldiers responsible for mistreating corpses, and ensure that such acts cease immediately. Military and judicial officials should ensure that captured combatants and civilians are treated in accordance with due process standards, including being promptly brought before a judge and charged, or released. Detainees should not be mistreated or held in inhumane conditions.
Posted by editor on Jul 24 2013. Filed under Breaking NewsPoliticsTop Stories. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Comments

Support Our Work Now !

Africa Realities Media is independent. Your support helps us expose injustice, challenge silence and produce evidence-based analysis on Africa and the Great Lakes Region.

Recent Posts

Show more
Africa Realities Media offre un espace aux Ă©crivains, chercheurs, experts, activistes, voix communautaires, militants, analystes et personnes ayant une expĂ©rience vĂ©cue qui souhaitent contribuer Ă  des contenus rĂ©flĂ©chis, responsables et courageux sur les changements nĂ©cessaires dans la rĂ©gion des Grands Lacs, ainsi que sur les rĂ©alitĂ©s politiques, Ă©conomiques, culturelles et sociales africaines souvent ignorĂ©es, minimisĂ©es ou mal reprĂ©sentĂ©es. Nos articles et vidĂ©os visent Ă  ouvrir le dĂ©bat, renforcer la sensibilisation, encourager la pensĂ©e critique et favoriser une rĂ©flexion plus profonde sur les rĂ©alitĂ©s vĂ©cues par les populations africaines. Nous voulons aider les peuples de la rĂ©gion des Grands Lacs Ă  mieux comprendre leurs droits, notamment leurs droits humains, leur droit au dĂ©veloppement, leur droit Ă  la dignitĂ©, Ă  la sĂ©curitĂ©, au bien-ĂŞtre et Ă  une vie meilleure. Ă€ travers nos contenus, nous cherchons Ă©galement Ă  rappeler aux dĂ©cideurs, aux institutions publiques, aux acteurs rĂ©gionaux et internationaux, ainsi qu’aux responsables politiques, leur devoir de transparence, de responsabilitĂ© et de redevabilitĂ© envers les populations qu’ils prĂ©tendent servir. Notre objectif est de contribuer Ă  une culture de vĂ©ritĂ©, de justice, de participation citoyenne et de protection Ă©gale pour tous les peuples africains.

Why We Exist

Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states, ruling elites, armed groups, military forces and security services. But these abuses are often sustained by international silence, Western lobbying, trade interests, migration deals, mineral access, diplomatic partnerships and unequal global accountability. Africa Realities Media exposes that system.

Lived Experience Matters

Survivors, displaced communities, refugees, families affected by repression, journalists, activists, women, young people and diaspora voices are not passive subjects. They are knowledge holders. Their experiences must shape policy, advocacy, journalism and public debate. The people closest to injustice are often closest to the solutions.

Our Principle

Africa Realities Media is rooted in one principle: African lives deserve equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Popular Posts

THE BATTLE OF RUBAYA: Rwanda's War for Minerals Exposed

T he FDLR Pretext Collapses Under the Weight of Documented Plunder   Introduction: A Battle That Tells the Truth When Rwandan-backed RDF/M23 forces fought with extraordinary ferocity to seize and hold Rubaya — a remote mining town in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo — the stated justification was security. Kigali's consistent public line has been that its military presence in the DRC is a response to the threat posed by the Forces Democratiques de Liberation du Rwanda (FDLR), an armed group whose leaders include individuals linked to the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi. This narrative has been accepted, qualified, or left insufficiently challenged by Western governments and multilateral institutions for over a decade. The Battle of Rubaya strips that narrative bare. What unfolded in Rubaya was not a counter-insurgency operation against genocidal remnants. It was a sustained military campaign — reinforced by the Rwanda Defence Forces (RDF), prosecuted at sign...

LA BATAILLE DE RUBAYA : La guerre du Rwanda pour les minerais exposée

Le prĂ©texte des FDLR s’effondre sous le poids du pillage documentĂ© Introduction : une bataille qui dit la vĂ©ritĂ© Lorsque les forces RDF/M23 soutenues par le Rwanda ont combattu avec une fĂ©rocitĂ© extraordinaire pour s’emparer de Rubaya et la conserver — une ville minière reculĂ©e du Nord-Kivu, dans l’est de la RĂ©publique dĂ©mocratique du Congo — la justification officielle Ă©tait la sĂ©curitĂ©. La ligne publique constante de Kigali a Ă©tĂ© que sa prĂ©sence militaire en RDC rĂ©pond Ă  la menace posĂ©e par les Forces dĂ©mocratiques de libĂ©ration du Rwanda (FDLR), un groupe armĂ© dont les dirigeants comprennent des individus liĂ©s au gĂ©nocide de 1994 contre les Tutsi. Ce rĂ©cit a Ă©tĂ© acceptĂ©, nuancĂ©, ou laissĂ© insuffisamment contestĂ© par les gouvernements occidentaux et les institutions multilatĂ©rales pendant plus d’une dĂ©cennie. La bataille de Rubaya met ce rĂ©cit Ă  nu. Ce qui s’est dĂ©roulĂ© Ă  Rubaya n’Ă©tait pas une opĂ©ration de contre-insurrection contre des restes gĂ©nocidaires. C’Ă©tait une campagne mili...

Les remèdes cosmĂ©tiques de la France face Ă  la guerre dans l’est de la RDC

RĂ©solution 2773, ConfĂ©rence de Paris, doctrine macronienne du dialogue et pari de la Francophonie La politique de la France Ă  l’Ă©gard de l’est de la RDC a produit un schĂ©ma constant : un langage public fort, une faible application des dĂ©cisions, aucune pression visible fondĂ©e sur les sanctions, et des appels rĂ©pĂ©tĂ©s au dialogue qui laissent largement intact le levier militaire et politique du Rwanda. La France ne peut pas rĂ©diger des rĂ©solutions, organiser des confĂ©rences, rejeter les sanctions, appeler au dialogue, puis revendiquer la neutralitĂ© pendant que les civils restent sous occupation, dĂ©placement et violence. Dans une guerre de cette ampleur, le silence et l’inaction ne sont pas neutres. Ce sont des actes politiques. Introduction La France se prĂ©sente comme l’une des puissances occidentales les plus engagĂ©es dans la recherche de la paix dans l’est de la RĂ©publique dĂ©mocratique du Congo. Elle a parrainĂ© la RĂ©solution 2773 du Conseil de sĂ©curitĂ© des Nations unies. Elle a organ...

President Macron Against US Sanctions on Rwanda

How France's Interests in Mozambique Obstruct Peace in the DRC A Critical Analysis of Emmanuel Macron's Interview with TV5 Monde, Africa Forward Summit, Nairobi, 12 May 2026 Published by The African Rights Campaign (ARC)   |   London, May 2026   1. Introduction This analysis is based on French President Emmanuel Macron's interview with TV5 Monde, conducted on 12 May 2026 during the Africa Forward Summit in Nairobi, Kenya. In that interview, Macron was asked a direct question: given that Rwanda's support for the M23 armed group has been documented by United Nations experts, and given that the United States has imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force and several of its senior officers, why have France and the European Union declined to do the same? Macron's response was unconvincing, dishonest and analytically incoherent. It revealed not a carefully calibrated position of principled neutrality, but the operational logic of a government that has c...

[AFRICAFORUM] Tr : [hinterland1] Tr : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE

  ----- Mail transfĂ©rĂ© ----- De : Mpania Jean <drjeanmpania@yahoo.fr> Ă€ : Hinterland <hinterland1@yahoogroupes.fr> EnvoyĂ© le : Mercredi 26 fĂ©vrier 2014 17h13 Objet : [hinterland1] Tr : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE   Le Mercredi 26 fĂ©vrier 2014 9h56, congokdp <congokdp@gmail.com> a Ă©crit : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE :   Voici comment les institutions et tout le système de sĂ©curitĂ© de la RDC sont sous contrĂ´le du Rwanda et les officiels congolais infiltrĂ©s par des «hirondelles» rwandaises! L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE :  Voici comment les institutions et tout le système de sĂ©curitĂ© de la RDC sont sous contrĂ´le du Rwanda et les officiels congolais infiltrĂ©s par des «hirondelles» rwandaises! Le processus d'occupation de la RDC par le lobby tutsi rwandais passe par le...

The Kagame Myth: Western Power, Private Jets and Rwanda’s Controlled Reality

  ANALYSIS AND INVESTIGATION Introduction: The Myth and the Man Behind the Myth There is a version of Paul Kagame that exists in the conference halls of Davos, in the pages of Western magazines, in private hotel meetings in London, Paris and Washington, and on the sleeves of European football shirts. In this version, Kagame is a visionary. A builder. A disciplined African moderniser. A leader who pulled a broken country from the ashes of genocide and turned it into what admirers often call the “Singapore of Africa”. In this version, Rwanda is clean, efficient, safe, investment-friendly and orderly. Kagame is presented as the African leader the West wants to believe in: controlled, polished, pro-market, security-focused and comfortable in elite Western spaces. Then there is the Rwanda that many Rwandans, exiles, journalists, opposition figures and human rights organisations describe. In this Rwanda, YouTubers and online commentators are jailed for what they say. Critics die in custo...

Dr Phil Clark ( SOAS University of London): A biased lecturer and researcher about African issues.

Dr Phil Clark   was born in Sudan and   is currently   working at SOAS University of London. He is known to be   biased lecturer and researcher about African issues, particularly the Rwandan genocide.     With his poor judgement and analytical thinking, this man only talk about   the results   of events and forget the     root causes. He is a staunch supporter of the criminal, dictator and killer Paul Kagame , the President of   Rwanda. He is singing the song of the winner of the Rwandan  war. He is in the same boat with Linda Melvern, a biased British   freelancer who received a medal from the dictator Paul     Kagame. "> "> Dr.Phil Clark "> Linda Melvern I am asking Dr Phil Clark   one question:   Dear   Dr Phil Clark, What     was the   role of   Paul Kagame and RPF in the Rwandan  massacres and genocide in and outside Rwanda?   Based...

Le Président Macron contre les sanctions américaines imposées au Rwanda

Comment les intĂ©rĂŞts français au Mozambique font obstacle Ă  la paix en RDC Analyse critique de l'entretien d'Emmanuel Macron avec TV5 Monde, Africa Forward Summit, Nairobi, 12 mai 2026 PubliĂ© par The African Rights Campaign (ARC)   |   Londres, mai 2026     1. Introduction La prĂ©sente analyse est fondĂ©e sur l'entretien accordĂ© par le prĂ©sident français Emmanuel Macron Ă  TV5 Monde, le 12 mai 2026, lors de l'Africa Forward Summit Ă  Nairobi, au Kenya. Au cours de cet entretien, Macron s'est vu poser une question directe : Ă©tant donnĂ© que le soutien du Rwanda au groupe armĂ© M23 est aujourd'hui documentĂ© par les experts des Nations Unies, et Ă©tant donnĂ© que les États-Unis ont imposĂ© des sanctions aux Forces de dĂ©fense du Rwanda (FDR) ainsi qu'Ă  plusieurs de leurs hauts responsables, pourquoi la France et l'Union europĂ©enne n'ont-elles pas fait de mĂŞme ? La rĂ©ponse de Macron s'est rĂ©vĂ©lĂ©e peu convaincante, malhonnĂŞte et analytique...

Kagame’s Image Machine: Who Profits While Rwanda Stays Poor

I nvestigation:  Paying to Stay Poor: How Western PR Firms, Lobbyists, Sports Clubs and Media Outlets Profit from Rwanda’s Image Economy Introduction: An Ecosystem of Paid Influence Rwanda is often presented internationally as a model of discipline, security, investment promotion and post-genocide recovery. That image has been carefully built, repeatedly amplified and professionally protected. Behind it sits a costly international network of sports sponsorships, lobbying contracts, public relations firms, legal consultancy, political access, favourable media relationships and diplomatic narrative management. The moral problem is clear. Rwanda remains heavily dependent on foreign aid and external financing. According to World Bank-linked data, foreign aid received by Rwanda reached approximately 1.39 billion US dollars in 2023. UNDP’s 2025 Human Development Report gives Rwanda a Human Development Index value of 0.578 for 2023, placing it 159th out of 193 countries and territories. U...

Justice ou théâtre politique ? Les procès français du génocide rwandais et le travail inachevé de la réconciliation entre Rwandais

Introduction Depuis 2014, les tribunaux français ont poursuivi une sĂ©rie de ressortissants rwandais hutu pour leur rĂ´le prĂ©sumĂ© dans le gĂ©nocide de 1994 contre les Tutsi. Le premier procès, celui de l’ancien chef du renseignement Pascal Simbikangwa, a Ă©tĂ© suivi par les condamnations des anciens bourgmestres Octavien Ngenzi et Tito Barahira en 2016, puis par la condamnation, en 2023, de l’ancien officier de gendarmerie Philippe Hategekimana. Aucun accusĂ© jugĂ© en France, au titre de la compĂ©tence universelle, pour le gĂ©nocide rwandais n’a Ă©tĂ© acquittĂ©. D’autres poursuites devraient suivre. Ces procĂ©dures ont Ă©tĂ© largement saluĂ©es comme la preuve que la France affronte enfin son passĂ© d’État ayant protĂ©gĂ© des auteurs prĂ©sumĂ©s du gĂ©nocide sur son territoire. Des organisations internationales de dĂ©fense des droits humains, des spĂ©cialistes du gĂ©nocide et une partie de la sociĂ©tĂ© civile française les ont prĂ©sentĂ©es comme une contribution tardive, mais bienvenue, Ă  la lutte mondiale contre l’...

Why Africa Realities Media Is Different

Africa Realities Media speaks to Africa and to the developed world. Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states and ruling elites, but they are often protected by international silence, lobbying, public relations, trade interests, migration deals and unequal global accountability. While governments pay lobbyists to present a good image abroad, ordinary African people continue to face violence, hunger, disease, poverty, repression and exclusion. We challenge the normalisation of African suffering and demand equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Pourquoi Africa Realities Media est différent?

Africa Realities Media s’adresse Ă  l’Afrique et au monde dĂ©veloppĂ©. De nombreux abus subis par les peuples africains sont commis par des États africains et des Ă©lites dirigeantes, mais ils sont souvent protĂ©gĂ©s par le silence international, le lobbying, les relations publiques, les intĂ©rĂŞts commerciaux, les accords migratoires et une responsabilitĂ© mondiale inĂ©gale. Tandis que des gouvernements paient des lobbyistes pour prĂ©senter une bonne image Ă  l’Ă©tranger, des Africains ordinaires continuent de faire face Ă  la violence, Ă  la faim, aux maladies, Ă  la pauvretĂ©, Ă  la rĂ©pression et Ă  l’exclusion. Nous contestons la normalisation de la souffrance africaine et exigeons une vĂ©ritĂ© Ă©gale, une justice Ă©gale et une protection Ă©gale.

BBC News

Policy and Systems Change

Our work is designed to trigger debate, discomfort and action. We do not only expose injustice; we work for policy and systems change. We want governments and institutions to address the root causes of inequality, disadvantage, discrimination, exclusion and barriers affecting African people. We believe lasting change must be shaped by people with lived experience.

Exposing Injustice in Africa

Africa Realities Media is an independent African accountability platform based in London. We report, analyse and challenge the systems that shape African suffering, silence African victims and protect abusive power. We are not here to repeat diplomatic language. We are here to ask the questions that are often avoided: why are African deaths treated as normal? Why are African victims given less urgency? Why are governments that imprison, exclude, displace or kill their own people protected when they serve powerful international interests?

Africanews

Africa Realities Media gives space to writers, researchers, experts, activists, community voices, campaigners, analysts and people with lived experience who want to contribute thoughtful, responsible and courageous content about the changes needed in the region, as well as the political, economic, cultural and social African realities that are often ignored, minimised or misrepresented. Our articles and videos aim to encourage debate, raise awareness, stimulate critical thinking and support reflection. We seek to help people in the Great Lakes Region understand their rights to human rights, development and wellbeing, while also encouraging decision-makers to be more transparent, responsive and accountable.

Appel Ă  contributions

Sensibilisez le public aux causes qui vous tiennent Ă  cĹ“ur. Prenez part au changement que vous souhaitez voir Ă©merger. Aidez Ă  combattre l’injustice partout oĂą elle se manifeste.

Africa Realities Media accueille des articles originaux, analyses, tribunes, réflexions communautaires et commentaires fondés sur des faits concernant la région des Grands Lacs africains, ainsi que les questions liées à la justice, aux droits humains, à la gouvernance, aux conflits, à la paix, aux réfugiés, aux ressources naturelles et à la responsabilité publique en Afrique.

Nous accueillons Ă©galement les annonces concernant de nouvelles ou d’anciennes publications liĂ©es Ă  nos domaines d’intĂ©rĂŞt. Vous pouvez annoncer gratuitement votre publication, notamment un livre, un rapport, une Ă©tude, un article acadĂ©mique ou tout autre travail pertinent.

Les articles doivent être rédigés en anglais ou en français et ne doivent pas dépasser 1 500 mots.

Veuillez inclure le nom complet de l’auteur, qui sera publiĂ© avec l’article s’il est acceptĂ©.

Avant de soumettre votre article, veuillez d’abord lire nos pages du site web afin de vĂ©rifier si votre article correspond Ă  nos prioritĂ©s Ă©ditoriales, Ă  nos thèmes et Ă  nos domaines d’intĂ©rĂŞt.

Si vous avez un article, un commentaire ou une annonce de publication Ă  partager avec un public plus large, veuillez l’envoyer par email Ă  :

africarealitiesmedia@gmail.com

Nous Ă©tudierons la possibilitĂ© de publier gratuitement les articles et annonces de publications appropriĂ©s s’ils rĂ©pondent Ă  nos critères Ă©ditoriaux, notamment la pertinence, la clartĂ©, l’originalitĂ©, l’intĂ©rĂŞt public, le respect des communautĂ©s concernĂ©es et l’utilisation responsable des informations et des preuves.

Les articles sont publiĂ©s tels qu’ils sont soumis s’ils rĂ©pondent Ă  nos critères et Ă  notre politique Ă©ditoriale. Nous ne procĂ©dons pas Ă  une modification supplĂ©mentaire de votre article avant sa publication.