Skip to main content

About Africa Realities Media

Latest Analysis

Independent analysis, commentary and investigations on Africa, the Great Lakes Region and international accountability.

[AfricaRealities.com] Davos Forum: Rwanda must transform the present before embarking on transforming tomorrow

 


The Rwanda must transform the present before embarking on transforming tomorrow

By Jean P Ndindamahina,21January2016


Yesterday during the Davos' economic forum "transforming tomorrow" I watched with match enthusiasm what the panel members were to say and among them was President Kagame who have ruled Rwanda over two decades and other panel members were four chief executive officers Cheryl Sandburg (Facebook), Zachary Bookman(Open Gov ), Satya Nadella(Microsoft), Annand Mahindra(Mahindra Group) and the moderator was Andrew R.Sorkin who works as columnist for the new York Times.

These four executives' officers were talking about how their companies are more involved in the work to transform the world and the people who live in it through their companies' emerging technology and mostly the use of internet that connects people together and how this can benefit the world as whole.

The Facebook chief executive officer Sheryl Sandburg explained the importance of connectivity by giving some examples of women who were able to spread their ideas, opinions and creativity through the use of technology and by being able to get informed by being connected to data. And also Sheryl questioned whether human are going to change in terms of hope or in terms of fear. Is technological innovation good for tomorrow? Is human intelligence going to be taken over by the use of technology? Does Technological revolution means all jobs are destroyed?

For those in developed world have already experienced the power of technology where human labour have been replaced by machines which really means less people in work places. There is self-services on both internet and on the counter, human interactions between people in the office and those in their homes have been taken over by automated technology, people are spending more and more time talking to man-made machines than the real people hence I think the real long-term impact of all this kind of technological innovation has to be assessed to give more hope of better tomorrow and not fear and those are challenges for those who already have that use of technology

For Rwanda, the use of technology is only limited to privileged elite as those Rwandans citizens who are unprivileged and mostly live in remote villages around the country has no access to water and electricity. They are still living in the darkness for them to understand what even tomorrow means when in fact, they are still to discover their present.

As Sheryl mentioned, for someone in United states to be able to use internet and access Facebook, it cost at least $1 and I find that to be true because in Britain I get charged at least $1.5 a day for private internet which can be even more costly when using mobile phone data or public internet where you get charged per hour which cannot be less than $6 per hour. With 89% Rwandans living under $1 a day, was the president Paul Kagame in the right economic forum that speaks on behalf of Rwandan people?

My question has been the balance between income and connectivity. How do Rwandans will be able to access the world class technology when in fact they still earn less than $1 a day. Will they be able to use all their income to access data on internet? The answer is no hence I think the rwandan people are still far behind for them to benefit from cloud technology, only those elites who are already rich which means in Rwanda and may be in other some African states, rich people will continue to be rich while poor people continue to sink further into poverty because unlike rich elites, majority Rwandans are not connected to the outside world, they only understand their village and their leader.

When President kagame was asked on the failure of connectivity in emerging market such as Rwanda, he rather looked defending his "I don't know the answer" as he said " Failing people will continue to fail" I wondered how this matched with the objective of the forum which was to giving hope to industries and societies through the transformation of tomorrow! He started going out of the topic talking about government policy which he understands a little to give more incoherence argument on the influence of emerging technology.

The president Kagame rather became a boring member among those in the panel and those in the room felt it and even may be the moderator felt that actually president Kagame was in the wrong economic forum as he was watched by those in room and those who were sat next to him talking about what he does not really understand and when he was asked by the moderator whether the failure was the only way to go, he responded "Absolutely, struggle will be there, support will be there…" come on, what this is to do with emerging technology? If it was job interview he would not have passed but well for him, he has managed to change constitution to allow him more years in office and office that he still holds today since 2000.

In all economic revolutions and based on the fact that the developed world is about to embark on fourth technological revolution, Rwanda is skipped at all time. Rwanda as a country is still to achieve fist revolution which is political revolution which makes me wonder why president of Rwanda was among those who were discussing the pros and cons of this fourth technological revolution which would be facilitated by strong economic and political stability –finally I don't blame President Kagame for him struggling to give competent answers to all questions that were put before him! I rather blame those who have booked a place for him as a member of the panel not a member of audience.

When President Kagame was asked whether technological transparency is the one that makes Rwanda have more women in parliament and the cabinet, President Kagame responded "It is a question of choices" simply because Rwanda's policies don't need necessary to have to depend on technology and instead of answering the question he rather revealed the truth that actually Rwanda women are in the government for political reasons because it is not women in parliament who advocate some rights, ideas and causes and they are in the government to defend them but rather women who are in the parliament for political reason of strengthening cult of personality of President Kagame and his government and some of these women are happy in the government or in cabinet because they need work in order to overcome all life burdens in Rwanda.

The truth was put out by Cheryl Sandburg when she talks about women issues in government or in other organisations that are there but can't make decisions and that is the fact for Rwanda. In Rwanda 64 % Women in the government and in the parliament looks very impressive but the truth is that; any decision making is still out of their hands and even if they would think of an idea they would not bring it out in case it is considered to be against an aggressive leadership.

The current Rwanda as President Kagame said during the forum is under an ideological driven leadership that is not open for democratic processes and shockingly, those women in Rwanda's parliament have no access to data and most of them if not all, are mediocrely educated. Majority of those women are those who studied in 70s when computers were not readily available as today, their ability to access the world technological data and information is limited hence majority of these women have no connectivity to the world and having these majorities of women in parliament allows the dictatorship to flourish with fewer struggles.

President Kagame also requested a question directed to Sheryl Sandberg that she would have responded to well about Facebook investment in people if it was not advertising their company rather than helping and once again President Kagame did not have a clue why he felt he was more fit to answer the question than Sheryl Sandberg and other CEO as he struggled to match his people's income, capability to today's technological use triggering the moderator to give him a left hand shake at the end of the forum panel. 

It is true in Rwanda; people use Facebook data on their mobile phone free of charge. In the UK I fear to use my mobile phone because it is more expensive option as I get charged by per data I use while in Rwanda, a person can be on his or her mobile phone all day using Facebook and communicating with the rest of the world which is helping the people of Rwanda to connect to the rest of the world and more people in Rwanda are now starting to join Facebook in mass as a way to connect with friends, family and the rest of the outside world but still, their connection on Facebook is still heavily controlled by the government that closely monitors individuals' communication on his or her social media.so everyone in Rwanda becomes rather more careful of what they say and how they say it. They are not free to express their ideas and opinion freely on any social media and some of them chose not to connect to the internet in case, they become attempted to break the silence or in case their ideas and opinion are wrongly perceived by the elites in the government.

Rwanda should embark on political change and seek political stability before anything else. As we speak right now, the Rwanda's constitution has been demolished and replaced by the constitution which would allow President Kagame to keep being booked in the wrong forum in the name of Rwanda for life. With political revolution Rwanda will move on in the best economic direction but for now, for Rwanda to participate in the world forum on current and future technological issues and challenges, it is just increasing the number of the panel members and to allow President Kagame to keep lacking an answer to questions put before him and ofcurse that can be embarrassing especially when in front of well up to date audiences.

Read the new constitution as it is published by  IGIHE


###
"Hate Cannot Drive Out Hate. Only Love Can Do That", Dr. Martin Luther King.
###

__._,_.___

Posted by: Nzinink <nzinink@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.
I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.
The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
When the white man came we had the land and they had the bibles; now they have the land and we have the bibles.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaRealities-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaRealities-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaRealities-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-http://www.africarealities.com/
-https://www.facebook.com/africarealities
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find  Friends in Africa:
http://www.datinginafrica.com/

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Support Our Work Now !

Africa Realities Media is independent. Your support helps us expose injustice, challenge silence and produce evidence-based analysis on Africa and the Great Lakes Region.

Recent Posts

Show more
Africa Realities Media offre un espace aux écrivains, chercheurs, experts, activistes, voix communautaires, militants, analystes et personnes ayant une expérience vécue qui souhaitent contribuer à des contenus réfléchis, responsables et courageux sur les changements nécessaires dans la région des Grands Lacs, ainsi que sur les réalités politiques, économiques, culturelles et sociales africaines souvent ignorées, minimisées ou mal représentées. Nos articles et vidéos visent à ouvrir le débat, renforcer la sensibilisation, encourager la pensée critique et favoriser une réflexion plus profonde sur les réalités vécues par les populations africaines. Nous voulons aider les peuples de la région des Grands Lacs à mieux comprendre leurs droits, notamment leurs droits humains, leur droit au développement, leur droit à la dignité, à la sécurité, au bien-être et à une vie meilleure. À travers nos contenus, nous cherchons également à rappeler aux décideurs, aux institutions publiques, aux acteurs régionaux et internationaux, ainsi qu’aux responsables politiques, leur devoir de transparence, de responsabilité et de redevabilité envers les populations qu’ils prétendent servir. Notre objectif est de contribuer à une culture de vérité, de justice, de participation citoyenne et de protection égale pour tous les peuples africains.

Why We Exist

Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states, ruling elites, armed groups, military forces and security services. But these abuses are often sustained by international silence, Western lobbying, trade interests, migration deals, mineral access, diplomatic partnerships and unequal global accountability. Africa Realities Media exposes that system.

Lived Experience Matters

Survivors, displaced communities, refugees, families affected by repression, journalists, activists, women, young people and diaspora voices are not passive subjects. They are knowledge holders. Their experiences must shape policy, advocacy, journalism and public debate. The people closest to injustice are often closest to the solutions.

Our Principle

Africa Realities Media is rooted in one principle: African lives deserve equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Popular Posts

THE BATTLE OF RUBAYA: Rwanda's War for Minerals Exposed

T he FDLR Pretext Collapses Under the Weight of Documented Plunder   Introduction: A Battle That Tells the Truth When Rwandan-backed RDF/M23 forces fought with extraordinary ferocity to seize and hold Rubaya — a remote mining town in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo — the stated justification was security. Kigali's consistent public line has been that its military presence in the DRC is a response to the threat posed by the Forces Democratiques de Liberation du Rwanda (FDLR), an armed group whose leaders include individuals linked to the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi. This narrative has been accepted, qualified, or left insufficiently challenged by Western governments and multilateral institutions for over a decade. The Battle of Rubaya strips that narrative bare. What unfolded in Rubaya was not a counter-insurgency operation against genocidal remnants. It was a sustained military campaign — reinforced by the Rwanda Defence Forces (RDF), prosecuted at sign...

Rwanda’s Major John Sengati assassinated in Gitarama, Rwanda

http://www.inyenyerinews.org/amakuru-2/rwandas-major-john-sengati-assassinated-in-gitarama-rwanda/ Rwanda's Major John Sengati assassinated in Gitarama, Rwanda May 12, 2013  by  Rwema IT Webmaster   Leave a Comment By: Jennifer Fierberg Rwandans are saddened by the death of Major John Sengati who was assassinated in Gitarama (appx 50km from Kigali) on May 10th, 2013. John Sengati was a retired Major, and ADC to Gen. Kayumba Nyamwasa from 1993 to 2001. After Gen Kayumba went to UK to further his studies, Major John Sengati was appointed Commanding Officer (C.O.) of Garrison Force that was in charge of the security to VIPs under the Ministry of Defense. Around 2007, he went to study at Kigali Institute of Technology (KIST) while he was still an active member of the RDF. According to local  reports , in 2009 Major Sengati's land was redistributed in Karama to local residents. Around 2010 he was forced to retire from the army, because he was considered to be loyal and ...

Desperate Kagame: Where Does He Go From Here—and What Comes Next?

  How Paul Kagame Uses Diplomats' "Bury Your Head in the Sand" Strategy as a Green Light to Continue Rwanda's War in the DRC Africa Realities Media   |   17 July 2026 The purpose of this article is to expose a deliberate and systematic strategy: Paul Kagame's years-long practice of creating events — diplomatic dinners, RPF party meetings, genocide commemorations, international business forums and RPF Bureau Politique addresses — to which he invites foreign ambassadors and the world's business and political elite for one purpose: to explain, justify, and defend Rwanda's military invasion of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Everybody who follows this region knows the strategy now. The same narrative. The same arguments. The same defiance. At one event he tells the Trump Administration to go to hell. At the next he says those sanctioning him will leave power and he will remain. At the RPF Bureau Politique of 17 July 2026, he tells ambassadors that the on...

The Kagame Myth: Western Power, Private Jets and Rwanda’s Controlled Reality

  ANALYSIS AND INVESTIGATION Introduction: The Myth and the Man Behind the Myth There is a version of Paul Kagame that exists in the conference halls of Davos, in the pages of Western magazines, in private hotel meetings in London, Paris and Washington, and on the sleeves of European football shirts. In this version, Kagame is a visionary. A builder. A disciplined African moderniser. A leader who pulled a broken country from the ashes of genocide and turned it into what admirers often call the “Singapore of Africa”. In this version, Rwanda is clean, efficient, safe, investment-friendly and orderly. Kagame is presented as the African leader the West wants to believe in: controlled, polished, pro-market, security-focused and comfortable in elite Western spaces. Then there is the Rwanda that many Rwandans, exiles, journalists, opposition figures and human rights organisations describe. In this Rwanda, YouTubers and online commentators are jailed for what they say. Critics die in custo...

The FDLR Myth: How Rwanda Weaponises a Diminished Threat to Justify Occupation

The FDLR Myth: How Rwanda Weaponises a Diminished Threat to Justify Occupation Investigation Exposes Contradictions in Rwanda's Security Narrative For over a decade, Rwanda has justified its military presence in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo by citing threats from the FDLR, a Hutu militia group linked to the 1994 genocide. But an investigation into FDLR's actual capabilities, Rwanda's military operations, and patterns of violence reveals a narrative that does not match reality. The FDLR threat, whilst real, has been systematically exaggerated and manipulated to justify objectives that have nothing to do with the militia group. Introduction The Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) occupies a central position in Rwanda's justification for military intervention in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. For more than two decades, Rwandan authorities have portrayed the militia group as an existential threat requiring sustaine...

[RwandaLibre] Re: *DHR* A qui François Hollande téléphone-t-il? Et qui reçoit-il à l'Elysée?

  Ndabona mu bo Francois Hollande avugana n'abo Kagame wenyine niwe utarimo. Nimwisomere namwe:  http://www.slate.fr/story/90909/hollande-telephone-politique-etrangere#xtor=RSS-2 From: "Samuel Desire sam4des@yahoo.com [Democracy_Human_Rights]" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr> To: DHR <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>; Rwandalibre Group <rwandalibre@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, 12 August 2014, 21:08 Subject: *DHR* A qui François Hollande téléphone-t-il? Et qui reçoit-il à l'Elysée?   A qui François Hollande téléphone-t-il? Et qui reçoit-il à l'Elysée? [VISUALISATION]   http://www.slate.fr/story/90909/hollande-telephone-politique-etrangere#xtor=RSS-2 Envoyé par : Samuel Desire <sam4des@yahoo.com> ...

The Aggressor’s Complaint: Why Rwanda’s “Biased” US Sanctions Argument Echoes Russia

Kigali wants Washington to punish Congo too. But a ceasefire that leaves the occupier in place is not peace; it is occupation without noise. African lives are not worth less. African deaths are not normal. Western interests must never become a licence to kill African people. Introduction: A Familiar Complaint On 29 June 2026, Rwanda’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Olivier Nduhungirehe, sat before the cameras of France 24 and declared that his country was “disappointed by the increasingly biased US mediation” in the conflict with the Democratic Republic of Congo. He asked why sanctions had targeted only Rwanda. He called the measures unfair, one-sided and counterproductive. Weeks earlier, President Paul Kagame had told Jeune Afrique that sanctions and threats were insults thrown at Rwanda, and accused Washington of exerting heavy pressure on Rwanda while treating the DRC more delicately. The grievance sounds reasonable until you remember where you have heard it before. Since 2022, the Kr...

The Empire of Kagame’s Global Friends: The Powerful Network Behind His International Protection

This article identifies the central obstacle to accountability for Paul Kagame’s actions in Rwanda and the Great Lakes region: the powerful global network of political leaders, former presidents, diplomats, philanthropists, religious figures, businesspeople, international institutions, sporting organisations, advisers and paid lobbyists that has promoted, legitimised, defended and protected him for three decades. This is a problem-identification article. It asks why Kagame has remained internationally influential and protected despite serious and extensively documented allegations concerning Rwanda’s military actions in the Democratic Republic of Congo, political repression, extraterritorial operations, mineral exploitation and the treatment of political opponents, journalists and critics. The answer is that Kagame has built an international network that gives him political access, diplomatic protection, commercial partnerships, institutional legitimacy, favourable media coverage, ...

Kagame’s Global Protection Network: Lobbying, Silence and Western Complicity: From 1990 to 2026.

Kagame’s Global Protection Network: Lobbying, Silence and Western Complicity: From 1990 to  2026.     More at:  https://www.africarealities. com/2026/07/the-empire-of- kagames-global-friends.html

French State-Sponsored Racism Without Limits Against the Hutu in France.

French State-Sponsored Racism Without Limits Against the Hutu in France France does not simply remember the Rwanda genocide. It owns it. For three decades, the French state has sponsored and enforced a racist political order — criminalising Hutu identity, silencing African expertise, enforcing a one-sided judicial record and reproducing the same ethnic hierarchy Belgium imposed on Rwanda under colonialism. This is not a failure of memory. It is state-sponsored racism without limits, dressed in the language of historical accountability. African lives are not worth less. African deaths are not normal. Western interests must never become a licence to kill African people. Introduction: Racism as Policy The genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda was real. Between April and July 1994, following an invasion of Rwanda launched by the RPF from Uganda on 1 October 1990, initially under the command of Major-General Fred Rwigyema and subsequently led by Paul Kagame after Rwigyema was killed ...

Why Africa Realities Media Is Different

Africa Realities Media speaks to Africa and to the developed world. Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states and ruling elites, but they are often protected by international silence, lobbying, public relations, trade interests, migration deals and unequal global accountability. While governments pay lobbyists to present a good image abroad, ordinary African people continue to face violence, hunger, disease, poverty, repression and exclusion. We challenge the normalisation of African suffering and demand equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Pourquoi Africa Realities Media est différent?

Africa Realities Media s’adresse à l’Afrique et au monde développé. De nombreux abus subis par les peuples africains sont commis par des États africains et des élites dirigeantes, mais ils sont souvent protégés par le silence international, le lobbying, les relations publiques, les intérêts commerciaux, les accords migratoires et une responsabilité mondiale inégale. Tandis que des gouvernements paient des lobbyistes pour présenter une bonne image à l’étranger, des Africains ordinaires continuent de faire face à la violence, à la faim, aux maladies, à la pauvreté, à la répression et à l’exclusion. Nous contestons la normalisation de la souffrance africaine et exigeons une vérité égale, une justice égale et une protection égale.

BBC News

Policy and Systems Change

Our work is designed to trigger debate, discomfort and action. We do not only expose injustice; we work for policy and systems change. We want governments and institutions to address the root causes of inequality, disadvantage, discrimination, exclusion and barriers affecting African people. We believe lasting change must be shaped by people with lived experience.

Exposing Injustice in Africa

Africa Realities Media is an independent African accountability platform based in London. We report, analyse and challenge the systems that shape African suffering, silence African victims and protect abusive power. We are not here to repeat diplomatic language. We are here to ask the questions that are often avoided: why are African deaths treated as normal? Why are African victims given less urgency? Why are governments that imprison, exclude, displace or kill their own people protected when they serve powerful international interests?

Africanews

Africa Realities Media gives space to writers, researchers, experts, activists, community voices, campaigners, analysts and people with lived experience who want to contribute thoughtful, responsible and courageous content about the changes needed in the region, as well as the political, economic, cultural and social African realities that are often ignored, minimised or misrepresented. Our articles and videos aim to encourage debate, raise awareness, stimulate critical thinking and support reflection. We seek to help people in the Great Lakes Region understand their rights to human rights, development and wellbeing, while also encouraging decision-makers to be more transparent, responsive and accountable.

Recent Posts

Appel à contributions

Sensibilisez le public aux causes qui vous tiennent à cœur. Prenez part au changement que vous souhaitez voir émerger. Aidez à combattre l'injustice partout où elle se manifeste.

Africa Realities Media accueille des articles originaux, analyses, tribunes, réflexions communautaires et commentaires fondés sur des faits concernant la région des Grands Lacs africains, ainsi que les questions liées à la justice, aux droits humains, à la gouvernance, aux conflits, à la paix, aux réfugiés, aux ressources naturelles et à la responsabilité publique en Afrique.

Nous accueillons également les annonces concernant de nouvelles ou d'anciennes publications liées à nos domaines d'intérêt. Vous pouvez annoncer gratuitement votre publication, notamment un livre, un rapport, une étude, un article académique ou tout autre travail pertinent.

Les articles doivent être rédigés en anglais ou en français et ne doivent pas dépasser 1 500 mots.

Veuillez inclure le nom complet de l'auteur, qui sera publié avec l'article s'il est accepté.

Avant de soumettre votre article, veuillez d'abord lire nos pages du site web afin de vérifier si votre article correspond à nos priorités éditoriales, à nos thèmes et à nos domaines d'intérêt.

Si vous avez un article, un commentaire ou une annonce de publication à partager avec un public plus large, veuillez l'envoyer par email à :

africarealitiesmedia@gmail.com

Nous étudierons la possibilité de publier gratuitement les articles et annonces de publications appropriés s'ils répondent à nos critères éditoriaux, notamment la pertinence, la clarté, l'originalité, l'intérêt public, le respect des communautés concernées et l'utilisation responsable des informations et des preuves.

Les articles sont publiés tels qu'ils sont soumis s'ils répondent à nos critères et à notre politique éditoriale. Nous ne procédons pas à une modification supplémentaire de votre article avant sa publication.