Latest Analysis
Independent analysis, commentary and investigations on Africa, the Great Lakes Region and international accountability.
[RwandaLibre] Lies About Rwanda Mean More Wars If Not Corrected
Lies About Rwanda Mean More Wars If Not Corrected
Saturday, 29 March 2014, 11:51 am
Article: David Swanson
By David Swanson
Urge the ending of war these days and you'll very quickly hear two
words: "Hitler" and "Rwanda." While World War II killed some 70
million people, it's the killing of some 6 to 10 million (depending on
who's included) that carries the name Holocaust. Never mind that the
United States and its allies refused to help those people before the
war or to halt the war to save them or to prioritize helping them when
the war ended -- or even to refrain from letting the Pentagon hire
some of their killers. Never mind that saving the Jews didn't become a
purpose for WWII until long after the war was over. Propose
eliminating war from the world and your ears will ring with the name
that Hillary Clinton calls Vladimir Putin and that John Kerry calls
Bashar al Assad.
Get past Hitler, and shouts of "We must prevent another Rwanda!" will
stop you in your tracks, unless your education has overcome a nearly
universal myth that runs as follows. In 1994, a bunch of irrational
Africans in Rwanda developed a plan to eliminate a tribal minority and
carried out their plan to the extent of slaughtering over a million
people from that tribe -- for purely irrational motivations of tribal
hatred. The U.S. government had been busy doing good deeds elsewhere
and not paying enough attention until it was too late. The United
Nations knew what was happening but refused to act, due to its being a
large bureaucracy inhabited by weak-willed non-Americans. But, thanks
to U.S. efforts, the criminals were prosecuted, refugees were allowed
to return, and democracy and European enlightenment were brought
belatedly to the dark valleys of Rwanda.
Something like this myth is in the minds of those who shout for
attacks on Libya or Syria or the Ukraine under the banner of "Not
another Rwanda!" The thinking would be hopelessly sloppy even if based
on facts. The idea that SOMETHING was needed in Rwanda morphs into the
idea that heavy bombing was needed in Rwanda which slides effortlessly
into the idea that heavy bombing is needed in Libya. The result is the
destruction of Libya. But the argument is not for those who pay
attention to what was happening in and around Rwanda before or since
1994. It's a momentary argument meant to apply only to a moment. Never
mind why Gadaffi was transformed from a Western ally into a Western
enemy, and never mind what the war left behind. Pay no attention to
how World War I was ended and how many wise observers predicted World
War II at that time. The point is that a Rwanda was going to happen in
Libya (unless you look at the facts too closely) and it did not
happen. Case closed. Next victim.
Edward Herman highly recommends a book by Robin Philpot called Rwanda
and the New Scramble for Africa: From Tragedy to Useful Imperial
Fiction, and so do I. Philpot opens with U.N. Secretary General
Boutros Boutros-Ghali's comment that "the genocide in Rwanda was one
hundred percent the responsibility of the Americans!" How could that
be? Americans are not to blame for how things are in backward parts of
the world prior to their "interventions." Surely Mr. double Boutros
has got his chronology wrong. Too much time spent in those U.N.
offices with foreign bureaucrats no doubt. And yet, the facts -- not
disputed claims but universally agreed upon facts that are simply
deemphasized by many -- say otherwise.
The United States backed an invasion of Rwanda on October 1, 1990, by
a Ugandan army led by U.S.-trained killers, and supported their attack
on Rwanda for three-and-a-half years. The Rwandan government, in
response, did not follow the model of the U.S. internment of Japanese
during World War II, or of U.S. treatment of Muslims for the past 12
years. Nor did it fabricate the idea of traitors in its midst, as the
invading army in fact had 36 active cells of collaborators in Rwanda.
But the Rwandan government did arrest 8,000 people and hold them for a
few days to six-months. Africa Watch (later Human Rights Watch/Africa)
declared this a serious violation of human rights, but had nothing to
say about the invasion and war. Alison Des Forges of Africa Watch
explained that good human rights groups "do not examine the issue of
who makes war. We see war as an evil and we try to prevent the
existence of war from being an excuse for massive human rights
violations."
The war killed many people, whether or not those killings qualified as
human rights violations. People fled the invaders, creating a huge
refugee crisis, ruined agriculture, wrecked economy, and shattered
society. The United States and the West armed the warmakers and
applied additional pressure through the World Bank, IMF, and USAID.
And among the results of the war was increased hostility between Hutus
and Tutsis. Eventually the government would topple. First would come
the mass slaughter known as the Rwandan Genocide. And before that
would come the murder of two presidents. At that point, in April 1994,
Rwanda was in chaos almost on the level of post-liberation Iraq or
Libya.
One way to have prevented the slaughter would have been to not support
the war. Another way to have prevented the slaughter would have been
to not support the assassination of the presidents of Rwanda and
Burundi on April 6, 1994. The evidence points strongly to the
U.S.-backed and U.S.-trained war-maker Paul Kagame -- now president of
Rwanda -- as the guilty party. While there is no dispute that the
presidents' plane was shot down, human rights groups and international
bodies have simply referred in passing to a "plane crash" and refused
to investigate.
A third way to have prevented the slaughter, which began immediately
upon news of the presidents' assassinations, might have been to send
in U.N. peacekeepers (not the same thing as Hellfire missiles, be it
noted), but that was not what Washington wanted, and the U.S.
government worked against it. What the Clinton administration was
after was putting Kagame in power. Thus the resistance to calling the
slaughter a "genocide" (and sending in the U.N.) until blaming that
crime on the Hutu-dominated government became seen as useful. The
evidence assembled by Philpot suggests that the "genocide" was not so
much planned as erupted following the shooting down of the plane, was
politically motivated rather than simply ethnic, and was not nearly as
one-sided as generally assumed.
Moreover, the killing of civilians in Rwanda has continued ever since,
although the killing has been much more heavy in neighboring Congo,
where Kagame's government took the war -- with U.S. aid and weapons
and troops -- and bombed refugee camps killing some million people.
The excuse for going into the Congo has been the hunt for Rwandan war
criminals. The real motivation has been Western control and profits.
War in the Congo has continued to this day, leaving some 6 million
dead -- the worst killing since the 70 million of WWII. And yet nobody
ever says "We must prevent another Congo!"
ends
© Scoop Media
http://www.google.ca/gwt/x?gl=CA&hl=en-CA&u=http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1403/S00200/lies-about-rwanda-mean-more-wars-if-not-corrected.htm&q=Lies+About+Rwanda+Mean+More+Wars+If+Not+Corrected
--
SIBOMANA Jean Bosco
Google+: https://plus.google.com/110493390983174363421/posts
YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9B4024D0AE764F3D
http://www.youtube.com/user/sibomanaxyz999
***Online Time:15H30-20H30, heure de Montréal.***Fuseau horaire
domestique: heure normale de la côte Est des Etats-Unis et Canada
(GMT-05:00)***
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___
Support Our Work Now !
Africa Realities Media is independent. Your support helps us expose injustice, challenge silence and produce evidence-based analysis on Africa and the Great Lakes Region.
Africa Realities Media offre un espace aux écrivains, chercheurs, experts, activistes, voix communautaires, militants, analystes et personnes ayant une expérience vécue qui souhaitent contribuer à des contenus réfléchis, responsables et courageux sur les changements nécessaires dans la région des Grands Lacs, ainsi que sur les réalités politiques, économiques, culturelles et sociales africaines souvent ignorées, minimisées ou mal représentées.
Nos articles et vidéos visent à ouvrir le débat, renforcer la sensibilisation, encourager la pensée critique et favoriser une réflexion plus profonde sur les réalités vécues par les populations africaines. Nous voulons aider les peuples de la région des Grands Lacs à mieux comprendre leurs droits, notamment leurs droits humains, leur droit au développement, leur droit à la dignité, à la sécurité, au bien-être et à une vie meilleure.
À travers nos contenus, nous cherchons également à rappeler aux décideurs, aux institutions publiques, aux acteurs régionaux et internationaux, ainsi qu’aux responsables politiques, leur devoir de transparence, de responsabilité et de redevabilité envers les populations qu’ils prétendent servir. Notre objectif est de contribuer à une culture de vérité, de justice, de participation citoyenne et de protection égale pour tous les peuples africains.
Why We Exist
Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states, ruling elites, armed groups, military forces and security services. But these abuses are often sustained by international silence, Western lobbying, trade interests, migration deals, mineral access, diplomatic partnerships and unequal global accountability.
Africa Realities Media exposes that system.
Lived Experience Matters
Survivors, displaced communities, refugees, families affected by repression, journalists, activists, women, young people and diaspora voices are not passive subjects. They are knowledge holders.
Their experiences must shape policy, advocacy, journalism and public debate. The people closest to injustice are often closest to the solutions.
Our Principle
Africa Realities Media is rooted in one principle: African lives deserve equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.
Popular Posts
T he FDLR Pretext Collapses Under the Weight of Documented Plunder Introduction: A Battle That Tells the Truth When Rwandan-backed RDF/M23 forces fought with extraordinary ferocity to seize and hold Rubaya — a remote mining town in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo — the stated justification was security. Kigali's consistent public line has been that its military presence in the DRC is a response to the threat posed by the Forces Democratiques de Liberation du Rwanda (FDLR), an armed group whose leaders include individuals linked to the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi. This narrative has been accepted, qualified, or left insufficiently challenged by Western governments and multilateral institutions for over a decade. The Battle of Rubaya strips that narrative bare. What unfolded in Rubaya was not a counter-insurgency operation against genocidal remnants. It was a sustained military campaign — reinforced by the Rwanda Defence Forces (RDF), prosecuted at sign...
Le prétexte des FDLR s’effondre sous le poids du pillage documenté Introduction : une bataille qui dit la vérité Lorsque les forces RDF/M23 soutenues par le Rwanda ont combattu avec une férocité extraordinaire pour s’emparer de Rubaya et la conserver — une ville minière reculée du Nord-Kivu, dans l’est de la République démocratique du Congo — la justification officielle était la sécurité. La ligne publique constante de Kigali a été que sa présence militaire en RDC répond à la menace posée par les Forces démocratiques de libération du Rwanda (FDLR), un groupe armé dont les dirigeants comprennent des individus liés au génocide de 1994 contre les Tutsi. Ce récit a été accepté, nuancé, ou laissé insuffisamment contesté par les gouvernements occidentaux et les institutions multilatérales pendant plus d’une décennie. La bataille de Rubaya met ce récit à nu. Ce qui s’est déroulé à Rubaya n’était pas une opération de contre-insurrection contre des restes génocidaires. C’était une campagne mili...
Résolution 2773, Conférence de Paris, doctrine macronienne du dialogue et pari de la Francophonie La politique de la France à l’égard de l’est de la RDC a produit un schéma constant : un langage public fort, une faible application des décisions, aucune pression visible fondée sur les sanctions, et des appels répétés au dialogue qui laissent largement intact le levier militaire et politique du Rwanda. La France ne peut pas rédiger des résolutions, organiser des conférences, rejeter les sanctions, appeler au dialogue, puis revendiquer la neutralité pendant que les civils restent sous occupation, déplacement et violence. Dans une guerre de cette ampleur, le silence et l’inaction ne sont pas neutres. Ce sont des actes politiques. Introduction La France se présente comme l’une des puissances occidentales les plus engagées dans la recherche de la paix dans l’est de la République démocratique du Congo. Elle a parrainé la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies. Elle a organ...
How France's Interests in Mozambique Obstruct Peace in the DRC A Critical Analysis of Emmanuel Macron's Interview with TV5 Monde, Africa Forward Summit, Nairobi, 12 May 2026 Published by The African Rights Campaign (ARC) | London, May 2026 1. Introduction This analysis is based on French President Emmanuel Macron's interview with TV5 Monde, conducted on 12 May 2026 during the Africa Forward Summit in Nairobi, Kenya. In that interview, Macron was asked a direct question: given that Rwanda's support for the M23 armed group has been documented by United Nations experts, and given that the United States has imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force and several of its senior officers, why have France and the European Union declined to do the same? Macron's response was unconvincing, dishonest and analytically incoherent. It revealed not a carefully calibrated position of principled neutrality, but the operational logic of a government that has c...
----- Mail transféré ----- De : Mpania Jean <drjeanmpania@yahoo.fr> À : Hinterland <hinterland1@yahoogroupes.fr> Envoyé le : Mercredi 26 février 2014 17h13 Objet : [hinterland1] Tr : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE Le Mercredi 26 février 2014 9h56, congokdp <congokdp@gmail.com> a écrit : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE : Voici comment les institutions et tout le système de sécurité de la RDC sont sous contrôle du Rwanda et les officiels congolais infiltrés par des «hirondelles» rwandaises! L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE : Voici comment les institutions et tout le système de sécurité de la RDC sont sous contrôle du Rwanda et les officiels congolais infiltrés par des «hirondelles» rwandaises! Le processus d'occupation de la RDC par le lobby tutsi rwandais passe par le...
ANALYSIS AND INVESTIGATION Introduction: The Myth and the Man Behind the Myth There is a version of Paul Kagame that exists in the conference halls of Davos, in the pages of Western magazines, in private hotel meetings in London, Paris and Washington, and on the sleeves of European football shirts. In this version, Kagame is a visionary. A builder. A disciplined African moderniser. A leader who pulled a broken country from the ashes of genocide and turned it into what admirers often call the “Singapore of Africa”. In this version, Rwanda is clean, efficient, safe, investment-friendly and orderly. Kagame is presented as the African leader the West wants to believe in: controlled, polished, pro-market, security-focused and comfortable in elite Western spaces. Then there is the Rwanda that many Rwandans, exiles, journalists, opposition figures and human rights organisations describe. In this Rwanda, YouTubers and online commentators are jailed for what they say. Critics die in custo...
Dr Phil Clark was born in Sudan and is currently working at SOAS University of London. He is known to be biased lecturer and researcher about African issues, particularly the Rwandan genocide. With his poor judgement and analytical thinking, this man only talk about the results of events and forget the root causes. He is a staunch supporter of the criminal, dictator and killer Paul Kagame , the President of Rwanda. He is singing the song of the winner of the Rwandan war. He is in the same boat with Linda Melvern, a biased British freelancer who received a medal from the dictator Paul Kagame. "> "> Dr.Phil Clark "> Linda Melvern I am asking Dr Phil Clark one question: Dear Dr Phil Clark, What was the role of Paul Kagame and RPF in the Rwandan massacres and genocide in and outside Rwanda? Based...
Comment les intérêts français au Mozambique font obstacle à la paix en RDC Analyse critique de l'entretien d'Emmanuel Macron avec TV5 Monde, Africa Forward Summit, Nairobi, 12 mai 2026 Publié par The African Rights Campaign (ARC) | Londres, mai 2026 1. Introduction La présente analyse est fondée sur l'entretien accordé par le président français Emmanuel Macron à TV5 Monde, le 12 mai 2026, lors de l'Africa Forward Summit à Nairobi, au Kenya. Au cours de cet entretien, Macron s'est vu poser une question directe : étant donné que le soutien du Rwanda au groupe armé M23 est aujourd'hui documenté par les experts des Nations Unies, et étant donné que les États-Unis ont imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense du Rwanda (FDR) ainsi qu'à plusieurs de leurs hauts responsables, pourquoi la France et l'Union européenne n'ont-elles pas fait de même ? La réponse de Macron s'est révélée peu convaincante, malhonnête et analytique...
I nvestigation: Paying to Stay Poor: How Western PR Firms, Lobbyists, Sports Clubs and Media Outlets Profit from Rwanda’s Image Economy Introduction: An Ecosystem of Paid Influence Rwanda is often presented internationally as a model of discipline, security, investment promotion and post-genocide recovery. That image has been carefully built, repeatedly amplified and professionally protected. Behind it sits a costly international network of sports sponsorships, lobbying contracts, public relations firms, legal consultancy, political access, favourable media relationships and diplomatic narrative management. The moral problem is clear. Rwanda remains heavily dependent on foreign aid and external financing. According to World Bank-linked data, foreign aid received by Rwanda reached approximately 1.39 billion US dollars in 2023. UNDP’s 2025 Human Development Report gives Rwanda a Human Development Index value of 0.578 for 2023, placing it 159th out of 193 countries and territories. U...
Introduction Depuis 2014, les tribunaux français ont poursuivi une série de ressortissants rwandais hutu pour leur rôle présumé dans le génocide de 1994 contre les Tutsi. Le premier procès, celui de l’ancien chef du renseignement Pascal Simbikangwa, a été suivi par les condamnations des anciens bourgmestres Octavien Ngenzi et Tito Barahira en 2016, puis par la condamnation, en 2023, de l’ancien officier de gendarmerie Philippe Hategekimana. Aucun accusé jugé en France, au titre de la compétence universelle, pour le génocide rwandais n’a été acquitté. D’autres poursuites devraient suivre. Ces procédures ont été largement saluées comme la preuve que la France affronte enfin son passé d’État ayant protégé des auteurs présumés du génocide sur son territoire. Des organisations internationales de défense des droits humains, des spécialistes du génocide et une partie de la société civile française les ont présentées comme une contribution tardive, mais bienvenue, à la lutte mondiale contre l’...
Why Africa Realities Media Is Different
Africa Realities Media speaks to Africa and to the developed world. Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states and ruling elites, but they are often protected by international silence, lobbying, public relations, trade interests, migration deals and unequal global accountability. While governments pay lobbyists to present a good image abroad, ordinary African people continue to face violence, hunger, disease, poverty, repression and exclusion. We challenge the normalisation of African suffering and demand equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.
Pourquoi Africa Realities Media est différent?
Africa Realities Media s’adresse à l’Afrique et au monde développé. De nombreux abus subis par les peuples africains sont commis par des États africains et des élites dirigeantes, mais ils sont souvent protégés par le silence international, le lobbying, les relations publiques, les intérêts commerciaux, les accords migratoires et une responsabilité mondiale inégale. Tandis que des gouvernements paient des lobbyistes pour présenter une bonne image à l’étranger, des Africains ordinaires continuent de faire face à la violence, à la faim, aux maladies, à la pauvreté, à la répression et à l’exclusion. Nous contestons la normalisation de la souffrance africaine et exigeons une vérité égale, une justice égale et une protection égale.
Policy and Systems Change
Our work is designed to trigger debate, discomfort and action. We do not only expose injustice; we work for policy and systems change.
We want governments and institutions to address the root causes of inequality, disadvantage, discrimination, exclusion and barriers affecting African people. We believe lasting change must be shaped by people with lived experience.
Exposing Injustice in Africa
Africa Realities Media is an independent African accountability platform based in London. We report, analyse and challenge the systems that shape African suffering, silence African victims and protect abusive power.
We are not here to repeat diplomatic language. We are here to ask the questions that are often avoided: why are African deaths treated as normal? Why are African victims given less urgency? Why are governments that imprison, exclude, displace or kill their own people protected when they serve powerful international interests?
Africa Realities Media gives space to writers, researchers, experts, activists, community voices, campaigners, analysts and people with lived experience who want to contribute thoughtful, responsible and courageous content about the changes needed in the region, as well as the political, economic, cultural and social African realities that are often ignored, minimised or misrepresented.
Our articles and videos aim to encourage debate, raise awareness, stimulate critical thinking and support reflection. We seek to help people in the Great Lakes Region understand their rights to human rights, development and wellbeing, while also encouraging decision-makers to be more transparent, responsive and accountable.
Comments
Post a Comment