Skip to main content

Latest Analysis

Independent analysis, commentary and investigations on Africa, the Great Lakes Region and international accountability.

FW: What is Community Empowerment

1

‘Community empowerment is local government’s core business’ (Sir Simon Milton, Chair of the Local Government Association)

Community empowerment is high on the current policy agenda. The Department for Communities

and Local Government is leading the drive to “enable more people to play an active role in the

decisions that affect their communities”. It produced a Community Empowerment Action Plan in

2007 to outline its own plans, and the new Community Empowerment White Paper will set out

cross-Government commitments.

But what does ‘community empowerment’ really mean? What does it look like? What does it

achieve? How will we know if we’re contributing to it?

Practical mechanisms are being introduced which it is hoped will contribute to community

empowerment, such as citizens’ juries, community kitties and local charters. But we also need a

comprehensive understanding of what community empowerment looks and feels like.

This short guide is designed to help you to get to grips with what is meant by community

empowerment. It takes the sometimes vague concept of ‘community empowerment’ and breaks it

down into five clear interlinked dimensions. It describes the processes and outcomes of each, and

provides examples of how you can use the dimensions to ensure your work is empowering.

This guide argues that an empowered community is one which is:

• confident

• inclusive

• organised

• co-operative

• influential

By asking questions about each of these five dimensions when planning and evaluating work, we can

ensure that we are taking an empowering approach and contributing to community empowerment.

with support from the National Empowerment Partnership

What is community

empowerment?

2

Values ...into action

Community Development Values

Real community empowerment is the result of

putting community development values into

action. These are values of:

Learning:

recognising the skills, knowledge and expertise that

people contribute, building on these and what has

gone before

Equality:

challenging discrimination and oppressive practices

within organisations, institutions and communities

Participation:

facilitating democratic involvement by people in the

issues which affect their lives based on full citizenship,

autonomy and shared power, skills, knowledge and

experience

Co-operation:

working together to identify and implement action,

encouraging networking and connections between

communities and organisations

Social justice:

enabling people to claim their human rights, meet

their needs and have greater control over the

decision-making processes which affect their lives

When thinking about community empowerment we

draw on decades of theory and practice concerned

with developing and understanding community

development.

“Community development is about building active

and sustainable communities based on social justice

and mutual respect… it is about changing power

structures to remove the barriers that prevent people

from participating in the issues that affect their lives”

(www.cdx.org.uk)

Dimensions of Community

Empowerment

Community empowerment has five dimensions:

Confident

…working in ways which increase people’s skills,

knowledge and confidence, and instill in them a

belief that they can make a difference

Inclusive

…working in ways which recognise that

discrimination exists, promote equality of

opportunity and good relations between groups

and challenge inequality and exclusion

Organised

…working in ways which bring people together

around common issues and concerns in

organisations and groups that are open, democratic

and accountable

Co-operative

…working in ways which build positive relationships

across groups, identify common messages, develop

and maintain links to national bodies and promote

partnership working

Influential

… working in ways which encourage and equip

communities to take part and influence decisions,

services and activities

These five dimensions provide a framework for

planning work which is empowering for communities,

however ‘community’ is identified and whichever area

of work is being planned. They can also be used as a

framework for identifying indicators and evaluating

the work, helping us to make judgements about

whether the processes and outcomes are leading to

community empowerment. They offer a broad and

comprehensive definition of community

empowerment, and can act as a basis for developing

collectively understood indicators.

Example: the community centre needs a new roof

The ‘short-cut’

You contract with a builder, based on lowest cost, and ask them to

carry out the work. As a result:

• a quick job is done within budget

• the community centre has a new roof

• local people do not understand how choices and decisions are

made – they complain about the design of the roof and say the

money could have been spent more wisely

• local people hold the council responsible for the mess left by the builders

• other communities complain that the council has prioritised the people using this community centre but

not theirs

A community empowerment approach

Confident

You involve local people in discussions about the roof, about what the planning, budgeting and work entails,

about how you go about getting building work done. You make sure that the information you provide is

accessible, and you take time to ensure people understand. As a result local people gain skills, knowledge and

confidence, which will help them take part in this and future projects.

Inclusive

You are aware of the make-up of the group you are working with – how reflective are they of the local

population and users of the centre, in terms of age, gender, race etc? You find ways to involve people who

have not used the centre so far, but might have an interest in doing so. You encourage discussion. As a result

you gain a cross-section of views, experience and expertise, people learn more about each other and work

together.

Organised

You encourage people to work as a team and work to each other’s strengths. You support them to develop

processes for discussions and decision-making which are understood by everyone there. As a result, they all

understand how the decisions will be made about which contractors to use, what the design will look like,

what the budget is and why. They have collective responsibility for the project.

Cooperative

You encourage the group to look at projects elsewhere. How have other groups worked with contractors, what

did they learn, who did they use and what happened? As a result the group learn from the experiences of

others, they widen their field of contact and may create some support networks. They find out about different

models of working, which may inform this project and the way the community centre is run in the future.

Influential

You encourage the group to make decisions and they do this within known parameters. They decide on the

design and timescale of the work, based on aesthetics, ecological considerations and the practical and

economic context. As a result, they can see the benefit of their involvement in the change that takes place and

feel collectively responsible for the new roof.

Taking a community empowerment approach, based on the five dimensions, is about making the

most of opportunities. The short-cut may be easier, quicker and financially cheaper, but it misses out

on the long term benefits – for the individuals taking part, for the community working together, for

your organisation and for society more widely.

3

4

Empowered community

Confident … working in ways which increase people’s skills,

knowledge and confidence, and instill in them a belief

that they can make a difference

Inclusive … working in ways which recognise that discrimination

exists, promote equality of opportunity and good

relations between groups and challenge inequality and

exclusion

Organised … working in ways which bring people together

around common issues and concerns, in organisations

and groups that are open, democratic and accountable

Co-operative … working in ways which build positive relationships

across groups, identify common messages, develop

and maintain links to national bodies and promote

partnership working

Influential … working in ways which encourage and equip

communities to take part and influence decisions,

services and activities

Dimensions of Community Our overall aim A community that is: We can contribute by...

5

• people don’t contribute in meetings

• people don’t understand your constraints, have

unrealistic expectations

• people don’t believe that change is possible or that

they have a role

• you only hear from the ‘usual suspects’ or the ‘same

voices’

• some groups feel isolated in their neighbourhoods

• people feel that others gain favours at their expense

• you’re not sure that ‘representatives’ are accountable

or speaking on behalf of others

• initiatives or activities are short-term and fizzle out

• ‘communities’ can’t seem to agree on ways forward

• communities compete with each other for your time

and resources

• work happens in silos or is duplicated

• communities feel hard done by compared to others

• communities have consultation fatigue and become

cynical

• you fail to deliver the most appropriate services

• you hit your targets but miss the point!

unity Empowerment

• people are more confident about taking part, they

ask questions and play an active role

• people understand the information being discussed

• people understand the constraints of the work

• people recognise their own and each other’s skills

knowledge and expertise

• there is greater understanding and awareness

between different local communities

• you hear diverse voices

• people are more likely to find common ground

• people understand the rationale for the allocation of

resources

• there are thriving community groups

• people are more likely to work collectively

• people work together and understand each others’

strengths

• people negotiate and identify shared solutions

• there is strong community infrastructure where

groups network and support each other

• people understand the needs of other communities

and the resources allocated to them

• people learn from each other

• people see themselves as part of a bigger picture

• communities are heard and their contribution

makes a difference

• communities take responsibility for the services and

activities provided

• communities receive appropriate services

Dangers of ignoring this dimension include Benefits of addressing this dimension include

Example: commissioning training services

The manager of a community centre is commissioning trainers to

provide a range of classes and activities for older people. The manager

wants to make sure that the centre offers a community development

approach to what they do, to build community empowerment.

To achieve this, the manager draws up a ‘statement of expectation’

based around the five community empowerment dimensions. These

expectations become criteria for commissioning, which are discussed

with potential trainers.

Statement of expectation:

“It is expected that trainers working on these premises will adopt a community development approach to their

work. By this, we mean that you will work in a way which helps build communities which are confident,

inclusive, organised, co-operative and influential.”

We expect trainers to:

Confident

• recognise the existing skill levels of individuals and ensure that everyone knows what is expected of them

• recognise the increase in skills needed to undertake the activity and share your knowledge and experience

with others in a way that helps them understand

• help people feel good about themselves and encourage people to believe that ‘they can do it’

Inclusive

• be aware of who is contributing in sessions, who is not and why

• be aware that running the class or session in particular ways excludes some people from taking part and

you take steps to address this

• deliver your class or sessions in a way which recognises, appreciates and builds on the differences and

similarities of those taking part

• challenge discriminatory language and behaviour

Organised

• encourage people to come together in groups, to share experiences, knowledge and skills

• identify common interests in the group and arrange activities around these

• where appropriate, encourage people to undertake group projects requiring a range of skills, recognising

strengths within the group

Co-operative

• illustrate how the activities you are working with link to others, encouraging groups to work together on

wider projects

• encourage the group to consider how their activity links to wider issues or global concerns

• where possible offer opportunities to visit related classes or activities

Influential

• provide opportunities for the group to contribute to the development of the class or session

• encourage them to suggest ideas and structures for future classes or resources.

6

Looking at community empowerment in this way

helps clarify what an organisation or department

needs to have in place to work in an

empowering way and contribute to community

empowerment.

Community empowerment is not just about

communities changing as they ‘become

empowered’. It is also about agencies changing

the way they work, to take more ‘empowering

approaches’.

The five dimensions suggest questions you can

ask about your organisation’s approach to

community empowerment.

For example:

Confident

• do staff have the necessary skills, knowledge

and support to work effectively with

communities?

• do staff understand the principles, processes

and time needed to take community

empowerment approaches to their work?

Inclusive

• are staff aware of power differences

between and within communities?

• do staff recognise that discrimination exists,

promote equality of opportunity and good

relations between groups?

• does the organisation have strategies for

dealing with competing demands and

working constructively with conflict?

Organised

• does the organisation have a shared

understanding of ‘community

empowerment’ and what it expects to

achieve?

• does the organisation monitor and evaluate

community empowerment activity?

• is the organisation creative about the way in

which targets are delivered to maximise

empowerment opportunities?

Cooperative

• is the organisation prepared to broker

relationships between elected members and

communities?

• does the organisation support effective

community networks and infrastructure, to

help community groups work together?

• does the organisation support local and

national networking among staff to

strengthen their community empowerment

skills and knowledge?

Influential

• does the organisation have clear routes for

communities to influence what it does?

• do staff feed back to communities what has

happened as a result of their involvement?

• does the organisation record evidence of

community influence?

• are staff able to challenge targets or

processes which compromise community

empowerment?

7

Is your organisation empowering?

Authentic community engagement happens when:

people in communities create structures and processes that are empowering for themselves and others

and

people in public agencies create structures and processes that are empowering for themselves and others.

Who we are

The Community Development Exchange (CDX) is the UK-wide membership

organisation for community development. We work to ensure that community

development is recognised and supported as a powerful way of tackling inequality and achieving

social justice. CDX reflects a diverse range of interests in community development across all sectors

and fields, and has members from across the UK. Find out more at www.cdx.org.uk

changes is an independent consultancy specialising in community engagement,

community development and active citizenship. Based in the West Midlands, we

work across the UK and Europe offering expertise in facilitation, training,

research, evaluation and consultancy. Find out more at www.changesuk.net

The development of this guide has been funded by the National Empowerment

Network.

More opportunities to put the dimensions into

practice

We have provided a few examples of how people have used the five dimensions to ensure their work

contributes to community empowerment. There are many more ways you could use the dimensions:

• to develop locally meaningful indicators, i.e. what would success look like for each of the

dimensions?

• to plan and write funding applications, using the dimensions to provide a clear way of explaining

and planning for community empowerment

• to carry out work reviews and appraisals – in what ways is the staff member addressing each of

the community empowerment dimensions in their work?

• to develop shared understandings of terminology and practice – what do the dimensions mean

to each partner? what would it mean for everyone to try to address all of them?

• to help identify good practice in community empowerment – is your project addressing all five

dimensions? where is it strongest? where is it weakest?

• to help develop strategies and plans, using the dimensions to help with process and structure

• to develop business plans which help you to make a business case for your project or service.

Where did the dimensions come from?

The five community empowerment dimensions illustrated in this booklet are part of a framework

designed for planning and evaluating community development. This framework is called DiCE

(Dimensions of Community Empowerment). It was developed by changes and builds on eight years

of development, application, review and practice. DiCE originates in the ABCD (Achieving Better

Community Development) framework developed by the Scottish Community Development Centre in

2000 (available from www.cdf.org.uk).

Using the whole DiCE framework (from which the five dimensions are drawn) you can plan, monitor

and evaluate community empowerment.

Published April 2008

Comments

Support Our Work Now !

Africa Realities Media is independent. Your support helps us expose injustice, challenge silence and produce evidence-based analysis on Africa and the Great Lakes Region.

Recent Posts

Show more
Africa Realities Media offre un espace aux écrivains, chercheurs, experts, activistes, voix communautaires, militants, analystes et personnes ayant une expérience vécue qui souhaitent contribuer à des contenus réfléchis, responsables et courageux sur les changements nécessaires dans la région des Grands Lacs, ainsi que sur les réalités politiques, économiques, culturelles et sociales africaines souvent ignorées, minimisées ou mal représentées. Nos articles et vidéos visent à ouvrir le débat, renforcer la sensibilisation, encourager la pensée critique et favoriser une réflexion plus profonde sur les réalités vécues par les populations africaines. Nous voulons aider les peuples de la région des Grands Lacs à mieux comprendre leurs droits, notamment leurs droits humains, leur droit au développement, leur droit à la dignité, à la sécurité, au bien-être et à une vie meilleure. À travers nos contenus, nous cherchons également à rappeler aux décideurs, aux institutions publiques, aux acteurs régionaux et internationaux, ainsi qu’aux responsables politiques, leur devoir de transparence, de responsabilité et de redevabilité envers les populations qu’ils prétendent servir. Notre objectif est de contribuer à une culture de vérité, de justice, de participation citoyenne et de protection égale pour tous les peuples africains.

Why We Exist

Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states, ruling elites, armed groups, military forces and security services. But these abuses are often sustained by international silence, Western lobbying, trade interests, migration deals, mineral access, diplomatic partnerships and unequal global accountability. Africa Realities Media exposes that system.

Lived Experience Matters

Survivors, displaced communities, refugees, families affected by repression, journalists, activists, women, young people and diaspora voices are not passive subjects. They are knowledge holders. Their experiences must shape policy, advocacy, journalism and public debate. The people closest to injustice are often closest to the solutions.

Our Principle

Africa Realities Media is rooted in one principle: African lives deserve equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Popular Posts

THE BATTLE OF RUBAYA: Rwanda's War for Minerals Exposed

T he FDLR Pretext Collapses Under the Weight of Documented Plunder   Introduction: A Battle That Tells the Truth When Rwandan-backed RDF/M23 forces fought with extraordinary ferocity to seize and hold Rubaya — a remote mining town in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo — the stated justification was security. Kigali's consistent public line has been that its military presence in the DRC is a response to the threat posed by the Forces Democratiques de Liberation du Rwanda (FDLR), an armed group whose leaders include individuals linked to the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi. This narrative has been accepted, qualified, or left insufficiently challenged by Western governments and multilateral institutions for over a decade. The Battle of Rubaya strips that narrative bare. What unfolded in Rubaya was not a counter-insurgency operation against genocidal remnants. It was a sustained military campaign — reinforced by the Rwanda Defence Forces (RDF), prosecuted at sign...

LA BATAILLE DE RUBAYA : La guerre du Rwanda pour les minerais exposée

Le prétexte des FDLR s’effondre sous le poids du pillage documenté Introduction : une bataille qui dit la vérité Lorsque les forces RDF/M23 soutenues par le Rwanda ont combattu avec une férocité extraordinaire pour s’emparer de Rubaya et la conserver — une ville minière reculée du Nord-Kivu, dans l’est de la République démocratique du Congo — la justification officielle était la sécurité. La ligne publique constante de Kigali a été que sa présence militaire en RDC répond à la menace posée par les Forces démocratiques de libération du Rwanda (FDLR), un groupe armé dont les dirigeants comprennent des individus liés au génocide de 1994 contre les Tutsi. Ce récit a été accepté, nuancé, ou laissé insuffisamment contesté par les gouvernements occidentaux et les institutions multilatérales pendant plus d’une décennie. La bataille de Rubaya met ce récit à nu. Ce qui s’est déroulé à Rubaya n’était pas une opération de contre-insurrection contre des restes génocidaires. C’était une campagne mili...

Les remèdes cosmétiques de la France face à la guerre dans l’est de la RDC

Résolution 2773, Conférence de Paris, doctrine macronienne du dialogue et pari de la Francophonie La politique de la France à l’égard de l’est de la RDC a produit un schéma constant : un langage public fort, une faible application des décisions, aucune pression visible fondée sur les sanctions, et des appels répétés au dialogue qui laissent largement intact le levier militaire et politique du Rwanda. La France ne peut pas rédiger des résolutions, organiser des conférences, rejeter les sanctions, appeler au dialogue, puis revendiquer la neutralité pendant que les civils restent sous occupation, déplacement et violence. Dans une guerre de cette ampleur, le silence et l’inaction ne sont pas neutres. Ce sont des actes politiques. Introduction La France se présente comme l’une des puissances occidentales les plus engagées dans la recherche de la paix dans l’est de la République démocratique du Congo. Elle a parrainé la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies. Elle a organ...

President Macron Against US Sanctions on Rwanda

How France's Interests in Mozambique Obstruct Peace in the DRC A Critical Analysis of Emmanuel Macron's Interview with TV5 Monde, Africa Forward Summit, Nairobi, 12 May 2026 Published by The African Rights Campaign (ARC)   |   London, May 2026   1. Introduction This analysis is based on French President Emmanuel Macron's interview with TV5 Monde, conducted on 12 May 2026 during the Africa Forward Summit in Nairobi, Kenya. In that interview, Macron was asked a direct question: given that Rwanda's support for the M23 armed group has been documented by United Nations experts, and given that the United States has imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force and several of its senior officers, why have France and the European Union declined to do the same? Macron's response was unconvincing, dishonest and analytically incoherent. It revealed not a carefully calibrated position of principled neutrality, but the operational logic of a government that has c...

[AFRICAFORUM] Tr : [hinterland1] Tr : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE

  ----- Mail transféré ----- De : Mpania Jean <drjeanmpania@yahoo.fr> À : Hinterland <hinterland1@yahoogroupes.fr> Envoyé le : Mercredi 26 février 2014 17h13 Objet : [hinterland1] Tr : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE   Le Mercredi 26 février 2014 9h56, congokdp <congokdp@gmail.com> a écrit : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE :   Voici comment les institutions et tout le système de sécurité de la RDC sont sous contrôle du Rwanda et les officiels congolais infiltrés par des «hirondelles» rwandaises! L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE :  Voici comment les institutions et tout le système de sécurité de la RDC sont sous contrôle du Rwanda et les officiels congolais infiltrés par des «hirondelles» rwandaises! Le processus d'occupation de la RDC par le lobby tutsi rwandais passe par le...

The Kagame Myth: Western Power, Private Jets and Rwanda’s Controlled Reality

  ANALYSIS AND INVESTIGATION Introduction: The Myth and the Man Behind the Myth There is a version of Paul Kagame that exists in the conference halls of Davos, in the pages of Western magazines, in private hotel meetings in London, Paris and Washington, and on the sleeves of European football shirts. In this version, Kagame is a visionary. A builder. A disciplined African moderniser. A leader who pulled a broken country from the ashes of genocide and turned it into what admirers often call the “Singapore of Africa”. In this version, Rwanda is clean, efficient, safe, investment-friendly and orderly. Kagame is presented as the African leader the West wants to believe in: controlled, polished, pro-market, security-focused and comfortable in elite Western spaces. Then there is the Rwanda that many Rwandans, exiles, journalists, opposition figures and human rights organisations describe. In this Rwanda, YouTubers and online commentators are jailed for what they say. Critics die in custo...

Dr Phil Clark ( SOAS University of London): A biased lecturer and researcher about African issues.

Dr Phil Clark   was born in Sudan and   is currently   working at SOAS University of London. He is known to be   biased lecturer and researcher about African issues, particularly the Rwandan genocide.     With his poor judgement and analytical thinking, this man only talk about   the results   of events and forget the     root causes. He is a staunch supporter of the criminal, dictator and killer Paul Kagame , the President of   Rwanda. He is singing the song of the winner of the Rwandan  war. He is in the same boat with Linda Melvern, a biased British   freelancer who received a medal from the dictator Paul     Kagame. "> "> Dr.Phil Clark "> Linda Melvern I am asking Dr Phil Clark   one question:   Dear   Dr Phil Clark, What     was the   role of   Paul Kagame and RPF in the Rwandan  massacres and genocide in and outside Rwanda?   Based...

Le Président Macron contre les sanctions américaines imposées au Rwanda

Comment les intérêts français au Mozambique font obstacle à la paix en RDC Analyse critique de l'entretien d'Emmanuel Macron avec TV5 Monde, Africa Forward Summit, Nairobi, 12 mai 2026 Publié par The African Rights Campaign (ARC)   |   Londres, mai 2026     1. Introduction La présente analyse est fondée sur l'entretien accordé par le président français Emmanuel Macron à TV5 Monde, le 12 mai 2026, lors de l'Africa Forward Summit à Nairobi, au Kenya. Au cours de cet entretien, Macron s'est vu poser une question directe : étant donné que le soutien du Rwanda au groupe armé M23 est aujourd'hui documenté par les experts des Nations Unies, et étant donné que les États-Unis ont imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense du Rwanda (FDR) ainsi qu'à plusieurs de leurs hauts responsables, pourquoi la France et l'Union européenne n'ont-elles pas fait de même ? La réponse de Macron s'est révélée peu convaincante, malhonnête et analytique...

Kagame’s Image Machine: Who Profits While Rwanda Stays Poor

I nvestigation:  Paying to Stay Poor: How Western PR Firms, Lobbyists, Sports Clubs and Media Outlets Profit from Rwanda’s Image Economy Introduction: An Ecosystem of Paid Influence Rwanda is often presented internationally as a model of discipline, security, investment promotion and post-genocide recovery. That image has been carefully built, repeatedly amplified and professionally protected. Behind it sits a costly international network of sports sponsorships, lobbying contracts, public relations firms, legal consultancy, political access, favourable media relationships and diplomatic narrative management. The moral problem is clear. Rwanda remains heavily dependent on foreign aid and external financing. According to World Bank-linked data, foreign aid received by Rwanda reached approximately 1.39 billion US dollars in 2023. UNDP’s 2025 Human Development Report gives Rwanda a Human Development Index value of 0.578 for 2023, placing it 159th out of 193 countries and territories. U...

Justice ou théâtre politique ? Les procès français du génocide rwandais et le travail inachevé de la réconciliation entre Rwandais

Introduction Depuis 2014, les tribunaux français ont poursuivi une série de ressortissants rwandais hutu pour leur rôle présumé dans le génocide de 1994 contre les Tutsi. Le premier procès, celui de l’ancien chef du renseignement Pascal Simbikangwa, a été suivi par les condamnations des anciens bourgmestres Octavien Ngenzi et Tito Barahira en 2016, puis par la condamnation, en 2023, de l’ancien officier de gendarmerie Philippe Hategekimana. Aucun accusé jugé en France, au titre de la compétence universelle, pour le génocide rwandais n’a été acquitté. D’autres poursuites devraient suivre. Ces procédures ont été largement saluées comme la preuve que la France affronte enfin son passé d’État ayant protégé des auteurs présumés du génocide sur son territoire. Des organisations internationales de défense des droits humains, des spécialistes du génocide et une partie de la société civile française les ont présentées comme une contribution tardive, mais bienvenue, à la lutte mondiale contre l’...

Why Africa Realities Media Is Different

Africa Realities Media speaks to Africa and to the developed world. Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states and ruling elites, but they are often protected by international silence, lobbying, public relations, trade interests, migration deals and unequal global accountability. While governments pay lobbyists to present a good image abroad, ordinary African people continue to face violence, hunger, disease, poverty, repression and exclusion. We challenge the normalisation of African suffering and demand equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Pourquoi Africa Realities Media est différent?

Africa Realities Media s’adresse à l’Afrique et au monde développé. De nombreux abus subis par les peuples africains sont commis par des États africains et des élites dirigeantes, mais ils sont souvent protégés par le silence international, le lobbying, les relations publiques, les intérêts commerciaux, les accords migratoires et une responsabilité mondiale inégale. Tandis que des gouvernements paient des lobbyistes pour présenter une bonne image à l’étranger, des Africains ordinaires continuent de faire face à la violence, à la faim, aux maladies, à la pauvreté, à la répression et à l’exclusion. Nous contestons la normalisation de la souffrance africaine et exigeons une vérité égale, une justice égale et une protection égale.

BBC News

Policy and Systems Change

Our work is designed to trigger debate, discomfort and action. We do not only expose injustice; we work for policy and systems change. We want governments and institutions to address the root causes of inequality, disadvantage, discrimination, exclusion and barriers affecting African people. We believe lasting change must be shaped by people with lived experience.

Exposing Injustice in Africa

Africa Realities Media is an independent African accountability platform based in London. We report, analyse and challenge the systems that shape African suffering, silence African victims and protect abusive power. We are not here to repeat diplomatic language. We are here to ask the questions that are often avoided: why are African deaths treated as normal? Why are African victims given less urgency? Why are governments that imprison, exclude, displace or kill their own people protected when they serve powerful international interests?

Africanews

Africa Realities Media gives space to writers, researchers, experts, activists, community voices, campaigners, analysts and people with lived experience who want to contribute thoughtful, responsible and courageous content about the changes needed in the region, as well as the political, economic, cultural and social African realities that are often ignored, minimised or misrepresented. Our articles and videos aim to encourage debate, raise awareness, stimulate critical thinking and support reflection. We seek to help people in the Great Lakes Region understand their rights to human rights, development and wellbeing, while also encouraging decision-makers to be more transparent, responsive and accountable.

Appel à contributions

Sensibilisez le public aux causes qui vous tiennent à cœur. Prenez part au changement que vous souhaitez voir émerger. Aidez à combattre l’injustice partout où elle se manifeste.

Africa Realities Media accueille des articles originaux, analyses, tribunes, réflexions communautaires et commentaires fondés sur des faits concernant la région des Grands Lacs africains, ainsi que les questions liées à la justice, aux droits humains, à la gouvernance, aux conflits, à la paix, aux réfugiés, aux ressources naturelles et à la responsabilité publique en Afrique.

Nous accueillons également les annonces concernant de nouvelles ou d’anciennes publications liées à nos domaines d’intérêt. Vous pouvez annoncer gratuitement votre publication, notamment un livre, un rapport, une étude, un article académique ou tout autre travail pertinent.

Les articles doivent être rédigés en anglais ou en français et ne doivent pas dépasser 1 500 mots.

Veuillez inclure le nom complet de l’auteur, qui sera publié avec l’article s’il est accepté.

Avant de soumettre votre article, veuillez d’abord lire nos pages du site web afin de vérifier si votre article correspond à nos priorités éditoriales, à nos thèmes et à nos domaines d’intérêt.

Si vous avez un article, un commentaire ou une annonce de publication à partager avec un public plus large, veuillez l’envoyer par email à :

africarealitiesmedia@gmail.com

Nous étudierons la possibilité de publier gratuitement les articles et annonces de publications appropriés s’ils répondent à nos critères éditoriaux, notamment la pertinence, la clarté, l’originalité, l’intérêt public, le respect des communautés concernées et l’utilisation responsable des informations et des preuves.

Les articles sont publiés tels qu’ils sont soumis s’ils répondent à nos critères et à notre politique éditoriale. Nous ne procédons pas à une modification supplémentaire de votre article avant sa publication.