Skip to main content

Latest Analysis

Independent analysis, commentary and investigations on Africa, the Great Lakes Region and international accountability.

FW: What is Community Empowerment

1

‘Community empowerment is local government’s core business’ (Sir Simon Milton, Chair of the Local Government Association)

Community empowerment is high on the current policy agenda. The Department for Communities

and Local Government is leading the drive to “enable more people to play an active role in the

decisions that affect their communities”. It produced a Community Empowerment Action Plan in

2007 to outline its own plans, and the new Community Empowerment White Paper will set out

cross-Government commitments.

But what does ‘community empowerment’ really mean? What does it look like? What does it

achieve? How will we know if we’re contributing to it?

Practical mechanisms are being introduced which it is hoped will contribute to community

empowerment, such as citizens’ juries, community kitties and local charters. But we also need a

comprehensive understanding of what community empowerment looks and feels like.

This short guide is designed to help you to get to grips with what is meant by community

empowerment. It takes the sometimes vague concept of ‘community empowerment’ and breaks it

down into five clear interlinked dimensions. It describes the processes and outcomes of each, and

provides examples of how you can use the dimensions to ensure your work is empowering.

This guide argues that an empowered community is one which is:

• confident

• inclusive

• organised

• co-operative

• influential

By asking questions about each of these five dimensions when planning and evaluating work, we can

ensure that we are taking an empowering approach and contributing to community empowerment.

with support from the National Empowerment Partnership

What is community

empowerment?

2

Values ...into action

Community Development Values

Real community empowerment is the result of

putting community development values into

action. These are values of:

Learning:

recognising the skills, knowledge and expertise that

people contribute, building on these and what has

gone before

Equality:

challenging discrimination and oppressive practices

within organisations, institutions and communities

Participation:

facilitating democratic involvement by people in the

issues which affect their lives based on full citizenship,

autonomy and shared power, skills, knowledge and

experience

Co-operation:

working together to identify and implement action,

encouraging networking and connections between

communities and organisations

Social justice:

enabling people to claim their human rights, meet

their needs and have greater control over the

decision-making processes which affect their lives

When thinking about community empowerment we

draw on decades of theory and practice concerned

with developing and understanding community

development.

“Community development is about building active

and sustainable communities based on social justice

and mutual respect… it is about changing power

structures to remove the barriers that prevent people

from participating in the issues that affect their lives”

(www.cdx.org.uk)

Dimensions of Community

Empowerment

Community empowerment has five dimensions:

Confident

…working in ways which increase people’s skills,

knowledge and confidence, and instill in them a

belief that they can make a difference

Inclusive

…working in ways which recognise that

discrimination exists, promote equality of

opportunity and good relations between groups

and challenge inequality and exclusion

Organised

…working in ways which bring people together

around common issues and concerns in

organisations and groups that are open, democratic

and accountable

Co-operative

…working in ways which build positive relationships

across groups, identify common messages, develop

and maintain links to national bodies and promote

partnership working

Influential

… working in ways which encourage and equip

communities to take part and influence decisions,

services and activities

These five dimensions provide a framework for

planning work which is empowering for communities,

however ‘community’ is identified and whichever area

of work is being planned. They can also be used as a

framework for identifying indicators and evaluating

the work, helping us to make judgements about

whether the processes and outcomes are leading to

community empowerment. They offer a broad and

comprehensive definition of community

empowerment, and can act as a basis for developing

collectively understood indicators.

Example: the community centre needs a new roof

The ‘short-cut’

You contract with a builder, based on lowest cost, and ask them to

carry out the work. As a result:

• a quick job is done within budget

• the community centre has a new roof

• local people do not understand how choices and decisions are

made – they complain about the design of the roof and say the

money could have been spent more wisely

• local people hold the council responsible for the mess left by the builders

• other communities complain that the council has prioritised the people using this community centre but

not theirs

A community empowerment approach

Confident

You involve local people in discussions about the roof, about what the planning, budgeting and work entails,

about how you go about getting building work done. You make sure that the information you provide is

accessible, and you take time to ensure people understand. As a result local people gain skills, knowledge and

confidence, which will help them take part in this and future projects.

Inclusive

You are aware of the make-up of the group you are working with – how reflective are they of the local

population and users of the centre, in terms of age, gender, race etc? You find ways to involve people who

have not used the centre so far, but might have an interest in doing so. You encourage discussion. As a result

you gain a cross-section of views, experience and expertise, people learn more about each other and work

together.

Organised

You encourage people to work as a team and work to each other’s strengths. You support them to develop

processes for discussions and decision-making which are understood by everyone there. As a result, they all

understand how the decisions will be made about which contractors to use, what the design will look like,

what the budget is and why. They have collective responsibility for the project.

Cooperative

You encourage the group to look at projects elsewhere. How have other groups worked with contractors, what

did they learn, who did they use and what happened? As a result the group learn from the experiences of

others, they widen their field of contact and may create some support networks. They find out about different

models of working, which may inform this project and the way the community centre is run in the future.

Influential

You encourage the group to make decisions and they do this within known parameters. They decide on the

design and timescale of the work, based on aesthetics, ecological considerations and the practical and

economic context. As a result, they can see the benefit of their involvement in the change that takes place and

feel collectively responsible for the new roof.

Taking a community empowerment approach, based on the five dimensions, is about making the

most of opportunities. The short-cut may be easier, quicker and financially cheaper, but it misses out

on the long term benefits – for the individuals taking part, for the community working together, for

your organisation and for society more widely.

3

4

Empowered community

Confident … working in ways which increase people’s skills,

knowledge and confidence, and instill in them a belief

that they can make a difference

Inclusive … working in ways which recognise that discrimination

exists, promote equality of opportunity and good

relations between groups and challenge inequality and

exclusion

Organised … working in ways which bring people together

around common issues and concerns, in organisations

and groups that are open, democratic and accountable

Co-operative … working in ways which build positive relationships

across groups, identify common messages, develop

and maintain links to national bodies and promote

partnership working

Influential … working in ways which encourage and equip

communities to take part and influence decisions,

services and activities

Dimensions of Community Our overall aim A community that is: We can contribute by...

5

• people don’t contribute in meetings

• people don’t understand your constraints, have

unrealistic expectations

• people don’t believe that change is possible or that

they have a role

• you only hear from the ‘usual suspects’ or the ‘same

voices’

• some groups feel isolated in their neighbourhoods

• people feel that others gain favours at their expense

• you’re not sure that ‘representatives’ are accountable

or speaking on behalf of others

• initiatives or activities are short-term and fizzle out

• ‘communities’ can’t seem to agree on ways forward

• communities compete with each other for your time

and resources

• work happens in silos or is duplicated

• communities feel hard done by compared to others

• communities have consultation fatigue and become

cynical

• you fail to deliver the most appropriate services

• you hit your targets but miss the point!

unity Empowerment

• people are more confident about taking part, they

ask questions and play an active role

• people understand the information being discussed

• people understand the constraints of the work

• people recognise their own and each other’s skills

knowledge and expertise

• there is greater understanding and awareness

between different local communities

• you hear diverse voices

• people are more likely to find common ground

• people understand the rationale for the allocation of

resources

• there are thriving community groups

• people are more likely to work collectively

• people work together and understand each others’

strengths

• people negotiate and identify shared solutions

• there is strong community infrastructure where

groups network and support each other

• people understand the needs of other communities

and the resources allocated to them

• people learn from each other

• people see themselves as part of a bigger picture

• communities are heard and their contribution

makes a difference

• communities take responsibility for the services and

activities provided

• communities receive appropriate services

Dangers of ignoring this dimension include Benefits of addressing this dimension include

Example: commissioning training services

The manager of a community centre is commissioning trainers to

provide a range of classes and activities for older people. The manager

wants to make sure that the centre offers a community development

approach to what they do, to build community empowerment.

To achieve this, the manager draws up a ‘statement of expectation’

based around the five community empowerment dimensions. These

expectations become criteria for commissioning, which are discussed

with potential trainers.

Statement of expectation:

“It is expected that trainers working on these premises will adopt a community development approach to their

work. By this, we mean that you will work in a way which helps build communities which are confident,

inclusive, organised, co-operative and influential.”

We expect trainers to:

Confident

• recognise the existing skill levels of individuals and ensure that everyone knows what is expected of them

• recognise the increase in skills needed to undertake the activity and share your knowledge and experience

with others in a way that helps them understand

• help people feel good about themselves and encourage people to believe that ‘they can do it’

Inclusive

• be aware of who is contributing in sessions, who is not and why

• be aware that running the class or session in particular ways excludes some people from taking part and

you take steps to address this

• deliver your class or sessions in a way which recognises, appreciates and builds on the differences and

similarities of those taking part

• challenge discriminatory language and behaviour

Organised

• encourage people to come together in groups, to share experiences, knowledge and skills

• identify common interests in the group and arrange activities around these

• where appropriate, encourage people to undertake group projects requiring a range of skills, recognising

strengths within the group

Co-operative

• illustrate how the activities you are working with link to others, encouraging groups to work together on

wider projects

• encourage the group to consider how their activity links to wider issues or global concerns

• where possible offer opportunities to visit related classes or activities

Influential

• provide opportunities for the group to contribute to the development of the class or session

• encourage them to suggest ideas and structures for future classes or resources.

6

Looking at community empowerment in this way

helps clarify what an organisation or department

needs to have in place to work in an

empowering way and contribute to community

empowerment.

Community empowerment is not just about

communities changing as they ‘become

empowered’. It is also about agencies changing

the way they work, to take more ‘empowering

approaches’.

The five dimensions suggest questions you can

ask about your organisation’s approach to

community empowerment.

For example:

Confident

• do staff have the necessary skills, knowledge

and support to work effectively with

communities?

• do staff understand the principles, processes

and time needed to take community

empowerment approaches to their work?

Inclusive

• are staff aware of power differences

between and within communities?

• do staff recognise that discrimination exists,

promote equality of opportunity and good

relations between groups?

• does the organisation have strategies for

dealing with competing demands and

working constructively with conflict?

Organised

• does the organisation have a shared

understanding of ‘community

empowerment’ and what it expects to

achieve?

• does the organisation monitor and evaluate

community empowerment activity?

• is the organisation creative about the way in

which targets are delivered to maximise

empowerment opportunities?

Cooperative

• is the organisation prepared to broker

relationships between elected members and

communities?

• does the organisation support effective

community networks and infrastructure, to

help community groups work together?

• does the organisation support local and

national networking among staff to

strengthen their community empowerment

skills and knowledge?

Influential

• does the organisation have clear routes for

communities to influence what it does?

• do staff feed back to communities what has

happened as a result of their involvement?

• does the organisation record evidence of

community influence?

• are staff able to challenge targets or

processes which compromise community

empowerment?

7

Is your organisation empowering?

Authentic community engagement happens when:

people in communities create structures and processes that are empowering for themselves and others

and

people in public agencies create structures and processes that are empowering for themselves and others.

Who we are

The Community Development Exchange (CDX) is the UK-wide membership

organisation for community development. We work to ensure that community

development is recognised and supported as a powerful way of tackling inequality and achieving

social justice. CDX reflects a diverse range of interests in community development across all sectors

and fields, and has members from across the UK. Find out more at www.cdx.org.uk

changes is an independent consultancy specialising in community engagement,

community development and active citizenship. Based in the West Midlands, we

work across the UK and Europe offering expertise in facilitation, training,

research, evaluation and consultancy. Find out more at www.changesuk.net

The development of this guide has been funded by the National Empowerment

Network.

More opportunities to put the dimensions into

practice

We have provided a few examples of how people have used the five dimensions to ensure their work

contributes to community empowerment. There are many more ways you could use the dimensions:

• to develop locally meaningful indicators, i.e. what would success look like for each of the

dimensions?

• to plan and write funding applications, using the dimensions to provide a clear way of explaining

and planning for community empowerment

• to carry out work reviews and appraisals – in what ways is the staff member addressing each of

the community empowerment dimensions in their work?

• to develop shared understandings of terminology and practice – what do the dimensions mean

to each partner? what would it mean for everyone to try to address all of them?

• to help identify good practice in community empowerment – is your project addressing all five

dimensions? where is it strongest? where is it weakest?

• to help develop strategies and plans, using the dimensions to help with process and structure

• to develop business plans which help you to make a business case for your project or service.

Where did the dimensions come from?

The five community empowerment dimensions illustrated in this booklet are part of a framework

designed for planning and evaluating community development. This framework is called DiCE

(Dimensions of Community Empowerment). It was developed by changes and builds on eight years

of development, application, review and practice. DiCE originates in the ABCD (Achieving Better

Community Development) framework developed by the Scottish Community Development Centre in

2000 (available from www.cdf.org.uk).

Using the whole DiCE framework (from which the five dimensions are drawn) you can plan, monitor

and evaluate community empowerment.

Published April 2008

Comments

Support Our Work Now !

Africa Realities Media is independent. Your support helps us expose injustice, challenge silence and produce evidence-based analysis on Africa and the Great Lakes Region.

Recent Posts

Show more
Africa Realities Media offre un espace aux écrivains, chercheurs, experts, activistes, voix communautaires, militants, analystes et personnes ayant une expérience vécue qui souhaitent contribuer à des contenus réfléchis, responsables et courageux sur les changements nécessaires dans la région des Grands Lacs, ainsi que sur les réalités politiques, économiques, culturelles et sociales africaines souvent ignorées, minimisées ou mal représentées. Nos articles et vidéos visent à ouvrir le débat, renforcer la sensibilisation, encourager la pensée critique et favoriser une réflexion plus profonde sur les réalités vécues par les populations africaines. Nous voulons aider les peuples de la région des Grands Lacs à mieux comprendre leurs droits, notamment leurs droits humains, leur droit au développement, leur droit à la dignité, à la sécurité, au bien-être et à une vie meilleure. À travers nos contenus, nous cherchons également à rappeler aux décideurs, aux institutions publiques, aux acteurs régionaux et internationaux, ainsi qu’aux responsables politiques, leur devoir de transparence, de responsabilité et de redevabilité envers les populations qu’ils prétendent servir. Notre objectif est de contribuer à une culture de vérité, de justice, de participation citoyenne et de protection égale pour tous les peuples africains.

Why We Exist

Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states, ruling elites, armed groups, military forces and security services. But these abuses are often sustained by international silence, Western lobbying, trade interests, migration deals, mineral access, diplomatic partnerships and unequal global accountability. Africa Realities Media exposes that system.

Lived Experience Matters

Survivors, displaced communities, refugees, families affected by repression, journalists, activists, women, young people and diaspora voices are not passive subjects. They are knowledge holders. Their experiences must shape policy, advocacy, journalism and public debate. The people closest to injustice are often closest to the solutions.

Our Principle

Africa Realities Media is rooted in one principle: African lives deserve equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Popular Posts

[RwandaLibre] Re: Miss Rwanda 2014

  En l'espace de quelques heures, en moins de 24 heures, je viens de lire 3 postings différents, provenant d'autant de membres différents, qui pointent vers la défaillance du système d'éducation au Rwanda. Certains surnomment ironiquement les diplômes générés par ce système "Merci Kagame"! Rares sont les écoles, fussent-elles du tiers-monde, où les étudiants à la fin de leurs études seraient incapables de fonctionner dans d'autres écoles à l'étranger. Pourtant c'est la triste réalité actuelle au Rwanda. Pour ceux qui connaissent le fonctionnement des Nations-Unies, il est grand temps de dépêcher sur place un rapporteur spécial... L'UNESCO peut-être! Sibomana Jean Bosco. *DHR* BBC: Iyumvire uburyo Kagame na FPR bazambije uburezi mu Rwanda kuburyo ababyeyi bifite bahitamo kohereza abana babo hanze Libellés : Forums Peter Rwagasabo - 29 janv. à rwagasabo, (bcc:Democrac...

[RwandaLibre] Itangazo ry'inama yahuje amashyaka i Buruseli kuwa 01/02/2014 -

  http://www.veritasinfo.fr/m/article-122363461.html Itangazo ry'inama yahuje amashyaka i Buruseli kuwa 01/02/2014 Nk'uko byari biteganyijwe, kuri uyu wa gatandatu tariki ya 01/02/2014, i Buruseli mu Bubiligi hateraniye inama y'amashyaka atavuga rumwe n'ubutegetsi bwa Perezida Paul Kagame. Ku mashyaka icumi yari yatumiwe, ayabonetse mu nama ni atandatu (60%), ari yo : 1. Forces Démocratiques Unifiées (FDU-Inkingi) ; 2. Forces Démocratiques de Libération du Rwanda (FDLR) ; 3. Pacte Démocratique du Peuple (PDP-Imanzi) ; 4. Parti pour la Démocratie au Rwanda (PDR-Ihumure) ; 5. Parti Social (PS-Imberakuri) ; 6. Rwandan Dream Initiative (RDI-Rwanda Rwiza). Ihuriro FCLR - Ubumwe naryo ryari rihagarariwe muri iyo nama.   Mu gutangira inama, abayijemo batoye umuyobozi wayo. Bamaze gusuzuma no kwemeza umurongo w'ibyigwa, bemeje ko muri iki gihe, ubufatanye  bw'amashyaka ya opposition ari ngombwa cyane  ...

The FDLR Myth: How Rwanda Weaponises a Diminished Threat to Justify Occupation

The FDLR Myth: How Rwanda Weaponises a Diminished Threat to Justify Occupation Investigation Exposes Contradictions in Rwanda's Security Narrative For over a decade, Rwanda has justified its military presence in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo by citing threats from the FDLR, a Hutu militia group linked to the 1994 genocide. But an investigation into FDLR's actual capabilities, Rwanda's military operations, and patterns of violence reveals a narrative that does not match reality. The FDLR threat, whilst real, has been systematically exaggerated and manipulated to justify objectives that have nothing to do with the militia group. Introduction The Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) occupies a central position in Rwanda's justification for military intervention in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. For more than two decades, Rwandan authorities have portrayed the militia group as an existential threat requiring sustaine...

[RwandaLibre] Re: Itangazo ry'inama yahuje amashyaka i Buruseli kuwa 01/02/2014 -

  @Mbera. Urakoze gutanga ibisobanuro birambuye kuri iyi ngingo. Ndagirango cyokora nkosore aho wafifitse nkana ugamije kujijisha rubanda.   Uragira uti: 1- [Hari ]urubuga rwa internet rw'umwimerere rwashyizweho muri 2007 http://www.fdu-rwanda.org/  n'urundi rubuga rwashinzwe n'abasigaye bakorera mu nzego bashyizeho bo nyuma y'aho Présidente agiriye mu Rwanda, arirwo http://www.fdu-rwanda.com/  rwashinzwe muri 2011. Nk'umuntu wamye uba Umunyamabanga mukuru wa FDU-Inkingi ukaba n'umuvugizi wayo kandi ukaba igikomeje kubyiyuta n'ubwo zahinduye imirishyo, wagombye kuba uzi ko Original website ya FDU-Inkingi yari  www.fdu-udf.org nk'uko bigararara muri iri tangazo ryo kuwa 23 Kamena 2010 umbere y'amakimbirane yatangiye muri january 2011: Nta kandida wigenga uzava muri FDU http://www.victoire2010.com/uploads/media/UMUKANDIDA_WA__FDU_01.pdf Kuba ruriya rubuga rundi rwaragiyeho nyuma byo ntawe utabizi kandi byar...

The Aggressor’s Complaint: Why Rwanda’s “Biased” US Sanctions Argument Echoes Russia

Kigali wants Washington to punish Congo too. But a ceasefire that leaves the occupier in place is not peace; it is occupation without noise. African lives are not worth less. African deaths are not normal. Western interests must never become a licence to kill African people. Introduction: A Familiar Complaint On 29 June 2026, Rwanda’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Olivier Nduhungirehe, sat before the cameras of France 24 and declared that his country was “disappointed by the increasingly biased US mediation” in the conflict with the Democratic Republic of Congo. He asked why sanctions had targeted only Rwanda. He called the measures unfair, one-sided and counterproductive. Weeks earlier, President Paul Kagame had told Jeune Afrique that sanctions and threats were insults thrown at Rwanda, and accused Washington of exerting heavy pressure on Rwanda while treating the DRC more delicately. The grievance sounds reasonable until you remember where you have heard it before. Since 2022, the Kr...

THE GENOCIDE AGAINST THE HUTU. PART 2: DOCUMENTED MASS KILLINGS OF HUTU POPULATIONS

MASS KILLINGS OF HUTU BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER 1994 IN RWANDA, DRC AND UGANDA INTRODUCTION TO PART 2 Part 1 established the assassination of President Habyarimana, the Bruguière and Spanish investigations, Kagame's responsibility for starting the war, the Kigali massacres, challenges to the "genocide against the Tutsi only" narrative, and the need for UN framework revision. Part 2 documents specific mass killings of Hutu populations that have been systematically erased from history: the Kibeho massacre of 1995, the Byumba Stadium massacre of 1994, the hunting and slaughter of Hutu refugees in the Democratic Republic of Congo from 1996 to 1997, killings in Uganda, and the pattern of political assassinations and property seizures. 2. THE KIBEHO MASSACRE (22 APRIL 1995) 2.1 The Camp and Its Population By April 1995, the Kibeho internally displaced persons camp in Gikongoro prefecture southwestern Rwanda held between 80,000 and 100,000...

Desperate Kagame: Where Does He Go From Here—and What Comes Next?

  How Paul Kagame Uses Diplomats' "Bury Your Head in the Sand" Strategy as a Green Light to Continue Rwanda's War in the DRC Africa Realities Media   |   17 July 2026 The purpose of this article is to expose a deliberate and systematic strategy: Paul Kagame's years-long practice of creating events — diplomatic dinners, RPF party meetings, genocide commemorations, international business forums and RPF Bureau Politique addresses — to which he invites foreign ambassadors and the world's business and political elite for one purpose: to explain, justify, and defend Rwanda's military invasion of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Everybody who follows this region knows the strategy now. The same narrative. The same arguments. The same defiance. At one event he tells the Trump Administration to go to hell. At the next he says those sanctioning him will leave power and he will remain. At the RPF Bureau Politique of 17 July 2026, he tells ambassadors that the on...

Analyse de l'audition de M Dacian Cioloș, candidat au poste de Secrétaire général de la Francophonie

  Le 30 juin 2026, pour la première fois en cinquante-six ans d'existence de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie, les candidats au poste de Secrétaire général ont été auditionnés publiquement devant les ministres des Affaires étrangères des 53 États membres de plein droit, réunis en Conférence ministérielle extraordinaire à Paris. Parmi les quatre prétendants au mandat 2027-2030, qui sera attribué par les chefs d'État au XXe Sommet de la Francophonie à Phnom Penh les 15 et 16 novembre 2026, figure un profil inédit : Dacian Cioloș, ancien Premier ministre de Roumanie, ancien commissaire européen à l'Agriculture et ancien président du groupe Renew au Parlement européen, seul candidat non africain de la course. Cet article, premier d'une série de cinq consacrée aux auditions, analyse la prestation de M. Cioloș sur huit axes : la vision, l'innovation, le développement des communautés locales, la promotion de la langue française, les conflits et la s...

Kagame désespéré : où va-t-il aller maintenant — et que va-t-il se passer ensuite ?

Comment Paul Kagame utilise la stratégie diplomatique de « l’autruche » comme feu vert pour poursuivre la guerre du Rwanda en RDC Le but de cet article est d’exposer une stratégie délibérée et systématique : la pratique, poursuivie depuis des années par Paul Kagame, consistant à créer des événements — dîners diplomatiques, réunions du parti FPR, commémorations du génocide, forums internationaux d’affaires et interventions devant le Bureau Politique du FPR — auxquels il invite des ambassadeurs étrangers ainsi que l’élite mondiale des affaires et de la politique dans un seul but : expliquer, justifier et défendre l’invasion militaire de la République démocratique du Congo par le Rwanda. Tous ceux qui suivent cette région connaissent désormais cette stratégie. Le même récit. Les mêmes arguments. La même défiance. Lors d’un événement, il dit à l’administration Trump d’aller au diable. Lors du suivant, il affirme que ceux qui le sanctionnent quitteront le pouvoir tandis que lui restera. Lor...

Analyse de l'audition de Mme Coumba Bâ, candidate au poste de Secrétaire général de la Francophonie

La francophonie utile à l'épreuve des projets concrets Conseillère à la présidence mauritanienne, forte d'une longue expérience auprès de cinq chefs d'État successifs de son pays, Coumba Bâ porte la candidature de la Mauritanie au poste de Secrétaire général de la Francophonie, dont le titulaire du mandat 2027-2030 sera désigné par les chefs d'État au XXe Sommet de la Francophonie, prévu à Phnom Penh les 15 et 16 novembre 2026. Son audition publique du 30 juin 2026 à Paris, devant les ministres des Affaires étrangères des 53 États membres de plein droit, reposait sur un positionnement singulier : celui d'un pays carrefour, à la fois africain, arabe et sahélien, présenté comme un pont possible vers les États qui ont quitté l'organisation. Cet article, quatrième d'une série de cinq consacrée aux auditions, analyse sa prestation sur huit axes : la vision, l'innovation, le développement des communautés locales, la promotion de la langue française, les confli...

Why Africa Realities Media Is Different

Africa Realities Media speaks to Africa and to the developed world. Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states and ruling elites, but they are often protected by international silence, lobbying, public relations, trade interests, migration deals and unequal global accountability. While governments pay lobbyists to present a good image abroad, ordinary African people continue to face violence, hunger, disease, poverty, repression and exclusion. We challenge the normalisation of African suffering and demand equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Pourquoi Africa Realities Media est différent?

Africa Realities Media s’adresse à l’Afrique et au monde développé. De nombreux abus subis par les peuples africains sont commis par des États africains et des élites dirigeantes, mais ils sont souvent protégés par le silence international, le lobbying, les relations publiques, les intérêts commerciaux, les accords migratoires et une responsabilité mondiale inégale. Tandis que des gouvernements paient des lobbyistes pour présenter une bonne image à l’étranger, des Africains ordinaires continuent de faire face à la violence, à la faim, aux maladies, à la pauvreté, à la répression et à l’exclusion. Nous contestons la normalisation de la souffrance africaine et exigeons une vérité égale, une justice égale et une protection égale.

BBC News

Policy and Systems Change

Our work is designed to trigger debate, discomfort and action. We do not only expose injustice; we work for policy and systems change. We want governments and institutions to address the root causes of inequality, disadvantage, discrimination, exclusion and barriers affecting African people. We believe lasting change must be shaped by people with lived experience.

Exposing Injustice in Africa

Africa Realities Media is an independent African accountability platform based in London. We report, analyse and challenge the systems that shape African suffering, silence African victims and protect abusive power. We are not here to repeat diplomatic language. We are here to ask the questions that are often avoided: why are African deaths treated as normal? Why are African victims given less urgency? Why are governments that imprison, exclude, displace or kill their own people protected when they serve powerful international interests?

Africanews

Africa Realities Media gives space to writers, researchers, experts, activists, community voices, campaigners, analysts and people with lived experience who want to contribute thoughtful, responsible and courageous content about the changes needed in the region, as well as the political, economic, cultural and social African realities that are often ignored, minimised or misrepresented. Our articles and videos aim to encourage debate, raise awareness, stimulate critical thinking and support reflection. We seek to help people in the Great Lakes Region understand their rights to human rights, development and wellbeing, while also encouraging decision-makers to be more transparent, responsive and accountable.

Appel à contributions

Sensibilisez le public aux causes qui vous tiennent à cœur. Prenez part au changement que vous souhaitez voir émerger. Aidez à combattre l’injustice partout où elle se manifeste.

Africa Realities Media accueille des articles originaux, analyses, tribunes, réflexions communautaires et commentaires fondés sur des faits concernant la région des Grands Lacs africains, ainsi que les questions liées à la justice, aux droits humains, à la gouvernance, aux conflits, à la paix, aux réfugiés, aux ressources naturelles et à la responsabilité publique en Afrique.

Nous accueillons également les annonces concernant de nouvelles ou d’anciennes publications liées à nos domaines d’intérêt. Vous pouvez annoncer gratuitement votre publication, notamment un livre, un rapport, une étude, un article académique ou tout autre travail pertinent.

Les articles doivent être rédigés en anglais ou en français et ne doivent pas dépasser 1 500 mots.

Veuillez inclure le nom complet de l’auteur, qui sera publié avec l’article s’il est accepté.

Avant de soumettre votre article, veuillez d’abord lire nos pages du site web afin de vérifier si votre article correspond à nos priorités éditoriales, à nos thèmes et à nos domaines d’intérêt.

Si vous avez un article, un commentaire ou une annonce de publication à partager avec un public plus large, veuillez l’envoyer par email à :

africarealitiesmedia@gmail.com

Nous étudierons la possibilité de publier gratuitement les articles et annonces de publications appropriés s’ils répondent à nos critères éditoriaux, notamment la pertinence, la clarté, l’originalité, l’intérêt public, le respect des communautés concernées et l’utilisation responsable des informations et des preuves.

Les articles sont publiés tels qu’ils sont soumis s’ils répondent à nos critères et à notre politique éditoriale. Nous ne procédons pas à une modification supplémentaire de votre article avant sa publication.