Skip to main content

Latest Analysis

Independent analysis, commentary and investigations on Africa, the Great Lakes Region and international accountability.

Re: [AfricaRealities] Central African peacekeeping force gears up for action

 

Thanks for this report.

Sincerely,

Pierre Chekem
Partnership Coordonator
tel(237)77 77 9962
====================================
--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 15/11/14, Samuel Desire sam4des@yahoo.com [AfricaRealities] <AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Subject: [AfricaRealities] Central African peacekeeping force gears up for action
To: "Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>, "africarealities@yahoogroups.com" <africarealities@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Saturday, 15 November, 2014, 23:23
















 









Central African peacekeeping force gears up
for actionCOMMENTEMAILPRINTEASY READSHAREPhoto: Laudes Mbon/IRINCEEAC troops
land on a beach in the Republic of Congo as part of
multinational manouevrersLOANGO, SOUTHERN CONGO,
10 November 2014 (IRIN) - With hundreds of soldiers from its
member states successfully completing a series of joint
exercises and manoeuvres in Congo, the Economic Community of
Central African States (CEEAC) says its Multinational Force
for Central Africa (FOMAC), is now ready to intervene in
local conflicts and be part of global anti-terrorism
initiatives. 

The recently
completed Loango 2014 operations
brought troops from eight of CEEAC's 10 member countries
(Angola, Burundi, Cameroon, CAR, Chad, Congo, Democratic
Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, and Sao Tome et

Principe - Rwanda may rejoin) to Loango in the south of
Congo. 

During 10 days of intense
exercises, Congolese,
Angolan and Cameroonian soldiers disembarked from a vessel
supplied by Equatorial Guinea. On land, they constructed a
field hospital and staged simulated exercises in which

hostages were liberated and a rebel leader was captured and
removed to a safe location. The operations involved both
ordinary soldiers and more specialist parachute units. In
overall command was Congolese Chief of Staff Gen Blanchard
Guy Okoï.

Presidents Denis Sassou of
Congo, Ali Bongo Ondimba of Gabon and Obianga Nguema of
Equatorial Guinea were among the guests at a closing
ceremony on 29 October. Ahmad Allam-Mi, a former Chadian
foreign minister, now CEEAC's secretary-general, said the
organization had shown how quickly it could respond to human
needs in time of crisis. "Our force is capable of bringing
help to the population," Allam-Mi emphasized. 

There was a strong emphasis in
Loango on fighting terrorism in central Africa. Gabon
Defence Minister Ernest Mpouho Epigat pointed to the
challenges posed by maritime piracy, but also warned that
the Nigerian Islamist movement Boko Haram was in striking
distance of central African nations. "Cameroon is now on
the frontline," Epigat warned. "It is good that the
countries of the sub-region hold this kind of exercise to
see how we can pool our personnel and resources to respond
to these threats and push them as far away as we
can." 

A bit of
history 

Until recently,
CEEAC was seen as slow to develop a serious military
profile. Formed in 1983, it was virtually moribund for much
of the 1990s, falling victim to regional rivalries and
having a lack of shared priorities. Geographically, it seems
an incongruous grouping of nations, stretching from Sao
Tomé and Principe in the Atlantic to Chad. 

CEEAC used an extraordinary summit in
Libreville (Gabon) in February 1998 to put itself on a new
footing. At a subsequent meeting in Malabo (Equatorial
Guinea) in 1999, heads of state outlined the need to work
more closely on peace and security issues. Tracing CEEAC's
history, security analyst Angela Meyer observed in Peace and Security
Cooperation in Central Africa: Challenges and
Prospects: "The lessons from years of conflict and
crises made it clear that regional economic cooperation
could not succeed without regional peace and
security." 

Progress was initially
slow. Member states were bitterly divided over the conflict
in the Democratic Republic of Congo, which broke out in
1998. Chad and Angola sent troops to defend embattled
President Laurent Kabila; Rwanda and Burundi backed rebels
advancing on Kinshasa. 

Stronger regional framework takes
shape 

But a stronger
regional security framework did take shape. The Council of
Peace and Security of Central Africa (COPAX), operational
since 2004, was set up to guide regional policy on defence
and security and given a mandate not only to deploy civilian
and military missions, but to help mediate in
crises. 

The Commission of Defence
and Security, made up of military and police chiefs, works
under a regional Planning Element and military
headquarters,
based in Libreville. CEEAC has at its disposal a Strategic
Analysis Group and a Rapid Alert Mechanism for Central
Africa, operating as an early warning system. Pointe Noire
in Congo hosts a Regional Centre for Maritime
Security. 

The collective security
initiatives taken in Central Africa are in line with
priorities outlined for the African Union's (AU) African
Peace and Security Architecture (APSA), which stresses the
need for viable regional structures that replicate what the
AU is doing at continental level. For example, the AU wants
to see regional versions of its Peace and Security Council
(PSC) and its Continental Early Warning System, which
CEEAC's MARAC seeks to emulate. 

Critical to the AU's long-term security plans is the
African Standby Force (ASF), which has the right to intervene in a member
state "in grave circumstances, namely war crimes, genocide
and crimes against humanity". The ASF's viability is
premised on efficient standby arrangements with Africa's
five sub-regions, which should "enable Africans to respond
swiftly to a crisis unhampered by any heavy political and
instrumental burden."  

In
principle, each regional bloc now has its own contingent
earmarked for ASF deployments, with FOMAC joining parallel
forces in other parts of the continent. An AU review of APSA's progress in 2010
acknowledged serious problems with each region
in delivering on commitments, pointing to ongoing conflicts
and a lack of operational capacity as major
handicaps.  

FOMAC - a force in progress 

FOMAC was not singled out for criticism, but
clearly needed to become more professional and better
coordinated. 

Set up in 2002,
FOMAC's standing orders identified the force as being made
up of military, police, gendarmerie and civilian personnel,
ready to carry out "peace, security and humanitarian
assistance missions". FOMAC's duties also extend to
disarmament and demobilization work and control of fraud and
organizational crimes. 

Compared to
the experience gained by Economic Community of West African
States (ECOWAS) troops in West African conflicts, including
Liberia,
Sierra Leone and Guinea-Bissau, Central African soldiers
saw little combat in regional missions, but no shortage of
capacity-building and practical collaboration. 

Loango 14, which was months
in the planning, was the latest in a series of multinational
training events, going back nearly a decade, which have
become increasing ambitious in their scale and objectives.
Chad played host to the Barh el Ghazel exercises in 2005 and
2007. Over 3,500 personnel took part in Kwanza 2010 in
Angola. 

Filling a
vacuum in CAR 

It was the
succession of crises in CAR which gave Central African
troops their first exposure to a regional war zone. FOMUC,
the multinational force of the six-nation Economic and
Monetary Community of Central Africa (CEMAC), was stationed
in
Bangui with a brief to support the CAR Armed Forces, which
had been hit by a wave of mutinies, threatening the rule of
President Ange-Félix Patassé. (CEMAC members are: Gabon,
Cameroon, CAR, Chad, Congo and Equatorial Guinea). 

FOMUC was superseded in 2008 by the Mission
of Consolidation of Peace in CAR (MICOPAX - a specific
mission of FOMAC). Funded in part by the EU and working
closely with French troops, its mandate was to help
establish peace and security.

After a
long period of low-intensity guerrilla activity and hesitant
peacebuilding, MICOPAX was hinting at a withdrawal by
September 2012. A Chadian commander told Radio France Internationale
(RFI): "Elections have been held and we are now in a
phase of consolidating the peace."  

But the emergence of Séléka, a newly
formed, heavily armed rebel coalition ended that
complacency. As Séléka made critical territorial gains
from December 2012, CEEAC called for more troops, but could
not prevent the fall of Bangui. 

As
CEEAC tried, with difficulty, to drive the peace process
outside CAR, MICOPAX numbers tripled, with over 2,000 troops
deployed. MICOPAX 2's brief was ambitious: to guarantee
security, provide protection and help restore police and
judicial system. The leading contributors were Congo,
Burundi, Chad and Rwanda, although Rwanda had left CEEAC in
2007. 

Often overshadowed by the
French military presence, FOMAC again faced accusations of
poor leadership and incoherence and having
little real presence outside Bangui. FOMAC's Chadian
contingent was accused of aligning itself with the Séléka
rebels, a charge strongly denied by the Chadian
authorities. 

In December 2013,
after lengthy talks between the AU and CEEAC, peacekeeping
operations were formally transferred to the African-led
International Support Mission to the Central African
Republic (MISCA), which in turn transferred authority to the UN
Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in CAR
(MINUSCA) in September 2014.  

Troops from CEMAC countries still make up the vast
majority of troops deployed in the CAR. 

The
verdict on MICOPAX 

FOMAC's role in the country has been much
criticised. But Alex Vines, head of the Africa programme at
the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham
House), said FOMAC soldiers had endeavoured to protect the
civilian population, perhaps more effectively than other
outside forces. "It was not a particularly exemplary
operation", Vines told IRIN. "But the troops were there
in very difficult circumstances." 

Vines, who has authored a 10-year study of the AU's approach to
continental security, A Decade of African Peace and
Security, Architecture, said all of the regional forces
meant to contribute to the ASF fell short of the AU's
requirements.
He noted the lack of a regional leader, the role played
(controversially) by Nigeria in West Africa in the past, and
also of states, like Angola, having a stake in different
regional blocs. 

Rwanda rejoins the fold 

Rwanda pulled out of CEEAC in 2007, pleading
insufficient funds, and engagements in too many other
regional blocs, the East Africa Community (EAC), for
example. The deployment of Rwanda troops in the CAR as part
of MICOPAX suggested that Rwanda was ready to re-engage with
CEEAC. This was confirmed by Rwandan Foreign Minister Louise
Mushikiwab at Loanga, who said her country had come a long
way from the genocide of 1994 and wanted to play a full role
in CEEAC. "We have decided to rejoin our brothers and
sisters in Central Africa with whom we share an important
heritage," Mushikiwabo explained. "At the next
of its summits, we will reintegrate with CEEAC. With great
pleasure we will come back into the heart of the
family." 

lmm/cs/cb 
Theme (s): Conflict, Security,[This report does not necessarily reflect the views of
the United Nations]Central African peacekeeping force gears up for
action
       Central
African peacekeeping force gears up for
actionWith hundreds of soldiers
from its member states successfully completing a series of
joint exercises and manoeuvres in Congo, the Economic
Community of Central
Afri...View
on www.irinnews.orgPreview
by Yahoo 
















__._,_.___

Posted by: Pierre Chekem <p_chekem@yahoo.co.uk>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)

Yahoo Groups
Test Campaign
subject line for test

----------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaRealities-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaRealities-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaRealities-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-http://www.africarealities.com/

-https://www.facebook.com/africarealities

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-New International Scholarships opportunities: http://www.scholarshipsgate.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Support Our Work Now !

Africa Realities Media is independent. Your support helps us expose injustice, challenge silence and produce evidence-based analysis on Africa and the Great Lakes Region.

Recent Posts

Show more
Africa Realities Media offre un espace aux écrivains, chercheurs, experts, activistes, voix communautaires, militants, analystes et personnes ayant une expérience vécue qui souhaitent contribuer à des contenus réfléchis, responsables et courageux sur les changements nécessaires dans la région des Grands Lacs, ainsi que sur les réalités politiques, économiques, culturelles et sociales africaines souvent ignorées, minimisées ou mal représentées. Nos articles et vidéos visent à ouvrir le débat, renforcer la sensibilisation, encourager la pensée critique et favoriser une réflexion plus profonde sur les réalités vécues par les populations africaines. Nous voulons aider les peuples de la région des Grands Lacs à mieux comprendre leurs droits, notamment leurs droits humains, leur droit au développement, leur droit à la dignité, à la sécurité, au bien-être et à une vie meilleure. À travers nos contenus, nous cherchons également à rappeler aux décideurs, aux institutions publiques, aux acteurs régionaux et internationaux, ainsi qu’aux responsables politiques, leur devoir de transparence, de responsabilité et de redevabilité envers les populations qu’ils prétendent servir. Notre objectif est de contribuer à une culture de vérité, de justice, de participation citoyenne et de protection égale pour tous les peuples africains.

Why We Exist

Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states, ruling elites, armed groups, military forces and security services. But these abuses are often sustained by international silence, Western lobbying, trade interests, migration deals, mineral access, diplomatic partnerships and unequal global accountability. Africa Realities Media exposes that system.

Lived Experience Matters

Survivors, displaced communities, refugees, families affected by repression, journalists, activists, women, young people and diaspora voices are not passive subjects. They are knowledge holders. Their experiences must shape policy, advocacy, journalism and public debate. The people closest to injustice are often closest to the solutions.

Our Principle

Africa Realities Media is rooted in one principle: African lives deserve equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Popular Posts

THE BATTLE OF RUBAYA: Rwanda's War for Minerals Exposed

T he FDLR Pretext Collapses Under the Weight of Documented Plunder   Introduction: A Battle That Tells the Truth When Rwandan-backed RDF/M23 forces fought with extraordinary ferocity to seize and hold Rubaya — a remote mining town in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo — the stated justification was security. Kigali's consistent public line has been that its military presence in the DRC is a response to the threat posed by the Forces Democratiques de Liberation du Rwanda (FDLR), an armed group whose leaders include individuals linked to the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi. This narrative has been accepted, qualified, or left insufficiently challenged by Western governments and multilateral institutions for over a decade. The Battle of Rubaya strips that narrative bare. What unfolded in Rubaya was not a counter-insurgency operation against genocidal remnants. It was a sustained military campaign — reinforced by the Rwanda Defence Forces (RDF), prosecuted at sign...

LA BATAILLE DE RUBAYA : La guerre du Rwanda pour les minerais exposée

Le prétexte des FDLR s’effondre sous le poids du pillage documenté Introduction : une bataille qui dit la vérité Lorsque les forces RDF/M23 soutenues par le Rwanda ont combattu avec une férocité extraordinaire pour s’emparer de Rubaya et la conserver — une ville minière reculée du Nord-Kivu, dans l’est de la République démocratique du Congo — la justification officielle était la sécurité. La ligne publique constante de Kigali a été que sa présence militaire en RDC répond à la menace posée par les Forces démocratiques de libération du Rwanda (FDLR), un groupe armé dont les dirigeants comprennent des individus liés au génocide de 1994 contre les Tutsi. Ce récit a été accepté, nuancé, ou laissé insuffisamment contesté par les gouvernements occidentaux et les institutions multilatérales pendant plus d’une décennie. La bataille de Rubaya met ce récit à nu. Ce qui s’est déroulé à Rubaya n’était pas une opération de contre-insurrection contre des restes génocidaires. C’était une campagne mili...

Les remèdes cosmétiques de la France face à la guerre dans l’est de la RDC

Résolution 2773, Conférence de Paris, doctrine macronienne du dialogue et pari de la Francophonie La politique de la France à l’égard de l’est de la RDC a produit un schéma constant : un langage public fort, une faible application des décisions, aucune pression visible fondée sur les sanctions, et des appels répétés au dialogue qui laissent largement intact le levier militaire et politique du Rwanda. La France ne peut pas rédiger des résolutions, organiser des conférences, rejeter les sanctions, appeler au dialogue, puis revendiquer la neutralité pendant que les civils restent sous occupation, déplacement et violence. Dans une guerre de cette ampleur, le silence et l’inaction ne sont pas neutres. Ce sont des actes politiques. Introduction La France se présente comme l’une des puissances occidentales les plus engagées dans la recherche de la paix dans l’est de la République démocratique du Congo. Elle a parrainé la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies. Elle a organ...

President Macron Against US Sanctions on Rwanda

How France's Interests in Mozambique Obstruct Peace in the DRC A Critical Analysis of Emmanuel Macron's Interview with TV5 Monde, Africa Forward Summit, Nairobi, 12 May 2026 Published by The African Rights Campaign (ARC)   |   London, May 2026   1. Introduction This analysis is based on French President Emmanuel Macron's interview with TV5 Monde, conducted on 12 May 2026 during the Africa Forward Summit in Nairobi, Kenya. In that interview, Macron was asked a direct question: given that Rwanda's support for the M23 armed group has been documented by United Nations experts, and given that the United States has imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force and several of its senior officers, why have France and the European Union declined to do the same? Macron's response was unconvincing, dishonest and analytically incoherent. It revealed not a carefully calibrated position of principled neutrality, but the operational logic of a government that has c...

[AFRICAFORUM] Tr : [hinterland1] Tr : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE

  ----- Mail transféré ----- De : Mpania Jean <drjeanmpania@yahoo.fr> À : Hinterland <hinterland1@yahoogroupes.fr> Envoyé le : Mercredi 26 février 2014 17h13 Objet : [hinterland1] Tr : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE   Le Mercredi 26 février 2014 9h56, congokdp <congokdp@gmail.com> a écrit : L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE :   Voici comment les institutions et tout le système de sécurité de la RDC sont sous contrôle du Rwanda et les officiels congolais infiltrés par des «hirondelles» rwandaises! L'OCCUPATION RWANDAISE EN MARCHE :  Voici comment les institutions et tout le système de sécurité de la RDC sont sous contrôle du Rwanda et les officiels congolais infiltrés par des «hirondelles» rwandaises! Le processus d'occupation de la RDC par le lobby tutsi rwandais passe par le...

The Kagame Myth: Western Power, Private Jets and Rwanda’s Controlled Reality

  ANALYSIS AND INVESTIGATION Introduction: The Myth and the Man Behind the Myth There is a version of Paul Kagame that exists in the conference halls of Davos, in the pages of Western magazines, in private hotel meetings in London, Paris and Washington, and on the sleeves of European football shirts. In this version, Kagame is a visionary. A builder. A disciplined African moderniser. A leader who pulled a broken country from the ashes of genocide and turned it into what admirers often call the “Singapore of Africa”. In this version, Rwanda is clean, efficient, safe, investment-friendly and orderly. Kagame is presented as the African leader the West wants to believe in: controlled, polished, pro-market, security-focused and comfortable in elite Western spaces. Then there is the Rwanda that many Rwandans, exiles, journalists, opposition figures and human rights organisations describe. In this Rwanda, YouTubers and online commentators are jailed for what they say. Critics die in custo...

Dr Phil Clark ( SOAS University of London): A biased lecturer and researcher about African issues.

Dr Phil Clark   was born in Sudan and   is currently   working at SOAS University of London. He is known to be   biased lecturer and researcher about African issues, particularly the Rwandan genocide.     With his poor judgement and analytical thinking, this man only talk about   the results   of events and forget the     root causes. He is a staunch supporter of the criminal, dictator and killer Paul Kagame , the President of   Rwanda. He is singing the song of the winner of the Rwandan  war. He is in the same boat with Linda Melvern, a biased British   freelancer who received a medal from the dictator Paul     Kagame. "> "> Dr.Phil Clark "> Linda Melvern I am asking Dr Phil Clark   one question:   Dear   Dr Phil Clark, What     was the   role of   Paul Kagame and RPF in the Rwandan  massacres and genocide in and outside Rwanda?   Based...

Le Président Macron contre les sanctions américaines imposées au Rwanda

Comment les intérêts français au Mozambique font obstacle à la paix en RDC Analyse critique de l'entretien d'Emmanuel Macron avec TV5 Monde, Africa Forward Summit, Nairobi, 12 mai 2026 Publié par The African Rights Campaign (ARC)   |   Londres, mai 2026     1. Introduction La présente analyse est fondée sur l'entretien accordé par le président français Emmanuel Macron à TV5 Monde, le 12 mai 2026, lors de l'Africa Forward Summit à Nairobi, au Kenya. Au cours de cet entretien, Macron s'est vu poser une question directe : étant donné que le soutien du Rwanda au groupe armé M23 est aujourd'hui documenté par les experts des Nations Unies, et étant donné que les États-Unis ont imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense du Rwanda (FDR) ainsi qu'à plusieurs de leurs hauts responsables, pourquoi la France et l'Union européenne n'ont-elles pas fait de même ? La réponse de Macron s'est révélée peu convaincante, malhonnête et analytique...

Kagame’s Image Machine: Who Profits While Rwanda Stays Poor

I nvestigation:  Paying to Stay Poor: How Western PR Firms, Lobbyists, Sports Clubs and Media Outlets Profit from Rwanda’s Image Economy Introduction: An Ecosystem of Paid Influence Rwanda is often presented internationally as a model of discipline, security, investment promotion and post-genocide recovery. That image has been carefully built, repeatedly amplified and professionally protected. Behind it sits a costly international network of sports sponsorships, lobbying contracts, public relations firms, legal consultancy, political access, favourable media relationships and diplomatic narrative management. The moral problem is clear. Rwanda remains heavily dependent on foreign aid and external financing. According to World Bank-linked data, foreign aid received by Rwanda reached approximately 1.39 billion US dollars in 2023. UNDP’s 2025 Human Development Report gives Rwanda a Human Development Index value of 0.578 for 2023, placing it 159th out of 193 countries and territories. U...

Justice ou théâtre politique ? Les procès français du génocide rwandais et le travail inachevé de la réconciliation entre Rwandais

Introduction Depuis 2014, les tribunaux français ont poursuivi une série de ressortissants rwandais hutu pour leur rôle présumé dans le génocide de 1994 contre les Tutsi. Le premier procès, celui de l’ancien chef du renseignement Pascal Simbikangwa, a été suivi par les condamnations des anciens bourgmestres Octavien Ngenzi et Tito Barahira en 2016, puis par la condamnation, en 2023, de l’ancien officier de gendarmerie Philippe Hategekimana. Aucun accusé jugé en France, au titre de la compétence universelle, pour le génocide rwandais n’a été acquitté. D’autres poursuites devraient suivre. Ces procédures ont été largement saluées comme la preuve que la France affronte enfin son passé d’État ayant protégé des auteurs présumés du génocide sur son territoire. Des organisations internationales de défense des droits humains, des spécialistes du génocide et une partie de la société civile française les ont présentées comme une contribution tardive, mais bienvenue, à la lutte mondiale contre l’...

Why Africa Realities Media Is Different

Africa Realities Media speaks to Africa and to the developed world. Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states and ruling elites, but they are often protected by international silence, lobbying, public relations, trade interests, migration deals and unequal global accountability. While governments pay lobbyists to present a good image abroad, ordinary African people continue to face violence, hunger, disease, poverty, repression and exclusion. We challenge the normalisation of African suffering and demand equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Pourquoi Africa Realities Media est différent?

Africa Realities Media s’adresse à l’Afrique et au monde développé. De nombreux abus subis par les peuples africains sont commis par des États africains et des élites dirigeantes, mais ils sont souvent protégés par le silence international, le lobbying, les relations publiques, les intérêts commerciaux, les accords migratoires et une responsabilité mondiale inégale. Tandis que des gouvernements paient des lobbyistes pour présenter une bonne image à l’étranger, des Africains ordinaires continuent de faire face à la violence, à la faim, aux maladies, à la pauvreté, à la répression et à l’exclusion. Nous contestons la normalisation de la souffrance africaine et exigeons une vérité égale, une justice égale et une protection égale.

BBC News

Policy and Systems Change

Our work is designed to trigger debate, discomfort and action. We do not only expose injustice; we work for policy and systems change. We want governments and institutions to address the root causes of inequality, disadvantage, discrimination, exclusion and barriers affecting African people. We believe lasting change must be shaped by people with lived experience.

Exposing Injustice in Africa

Africa Realities Media is an independent African accountability platform based in London. We report, analyse and challenge the systems that shape African suffering, silence African victims and protect abusive power. We are not here to repeat diplomatic language. We are here to ask the questions that are often avoided: why are African deaths treated as normal? Why are African victims given less urgency? Why are governments that imprison, exclude, displace or kill their own people protected when they serve powerful international interests?

Africanews

Africa Realities Media gives space to writers, researchers, experts, activists, community voices, campaigners, analysts and people with lived experience who want to contribute thoughtful, responsible and courageous content about the changes needed in the region, as well as the political, economic, cultural and social African realities that are often ignored, minimised or misrepresented. Our articles and videos aim to encourage debate, raise awareness, stimulate critical thinking and support reflection. We seek to help people in the Great Lakes Region understand their rights to human rights, development and wellbeing, while also encouraging decision-makers to be more transparent, responsive and accountable.

Appel à contributions

Sensibilisez le public aux causes qui vous tiennent à cœur. Prenez part au changement que vous souhaitez voir émerger. Aidez à combattre l’injustice partout où elle se manifeste.

Africa Realities Media accueille des articles originaux, analyses, tribunes, réflexions communautaires et commentaires fondés sur des faits concernant la région des Grands Lacs africains, ainsi que les questions liées à la justice, aux droits humains, à la gouvernance, aux conflits, à la paix, aux réfugiés, aux ressources naturelles et à la responsabilité publique en Afrique.

Nous accueillons également les annonces concernant de nouvelles ou d’anciennes publications liées à nos domaines d’intérêt. Vous pouvez annoncer gratuitement votre publication, notamment un livre, un rapport, une étude, un article académique ou tout autre travail pertinent.

Les articles doivent être rédigés en anglais ou en français et ne doivent pas dépasser 1 500 mots.

Veuillez inclure le nom complet de l’auteur, qui sera publié avec l’article s’il est accepté.

Avant de soumettre votre article, veuillez d’abord lire nos pages du site web afin de vérifier si votre article correspond à nos priorités éditoriales, à nos thèmes et à nos domaines d’intérêt.

Si vous avez un article, un commentaire ou une annonce de publication à partager avec un public plus large, veuillez l’envoyer par email à :

africarealitiesmedia@gmail.com

Nous étudierons la possibilité de publier gratuitement les articles et annonces de publications appropriés s’ils répondent à nos critères éditoriaux, notamment la pertinence, la clarté, l’originalité, l’intérêt public, le respect des communautés concernées et l’utilisation responsable des informations et des preuves.

Les articles sont publiés tels qu’ils sont soumis s’ils répondent à nos critères et à notre politique éditoriale. Nous ne procédons pas à une modification supplémentaire de votre article avant sa publication.