Skip to main content

Latest Analysis

Independent analysis, commentary and investigations on Africa, the Great Lakes Region and international accountability.

Re: [AfricaRealities] Central African peacekeeping force gears up for action

 

Thanks for this report.

Sincerely,

Pierre Chekem
Partnership Coordonator
tel(237)77 77 9962
====================================
--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 15/11/14, Samuel Desire sam4des@yahoo.com [AfricaRealities] <AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Subject: [AfricaRealities] Central African peacekeeping force gears up for action
To: "Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>, "africarealities@yahoogroups.com" <africarealities@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Saturday, 15 November, 2014, 23:23
















 









Central African peacekeeping force gears up
for actionCOMMENTEMAILPRINTEASY READSHAREPhoto: Laudes Mbon/IRINCEEAC troops
land on a beach in the Republic of Congo as part of
multinational manouevrersLOANGO, SOUTHERN CONGO,
10 November 2014 (IRIN) - With hundreds of soldiers from its
member states successfully completing a series of joint
exercises and manoeuvres in Congo, the Economic Community of
Central African States (CEEAC) says its Multinational Force
for Central Africa (FOMAC), is now ready to intervene in
local conflicts and be part of global anti-terrorism
initiatives. 

The recently
completed Loango 2014 operations
brought troops from eight of CEEAC's 10 member countries
(Angola, Burundi, Cameroon, CAR, Chad, Congo, Democratic
Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, and Sao Tome et

Principe - Rwanda may rejoin) to Loango in the south of
Congo. 

During 10 days of intense
exercises, Congolese,
Angolan and Cameroonian soldiers disembarked from a vessel
supplied by Equatorial Guinea. On land, they constructed a
field hospital and staged simulated exercises in which

hostages were liberated and a rebel leader was captured and
removed to a safe location. The operations involved both
ordinary soldiers and more specialist parachute units. In
overall command was Congolese Chief of Staff Gen Blanchard
Guy Okoï.

Presidents Denis Sassou of
Congo, Ali Bongo Ondimba of Gabon and Obianga Nguema of
Equatorial Guinea were among the guests at a closing
ceremony on 29 October. Ahmad Allam-Mi, a former Chadian
foreign minister, now CEEAC's secretary-general, said the
organization had shown how quickly it could respond to human
needs in time of crisis. "Our force is capable of bringing
help to the population," Allam-Mi emphasized. 

There was a strong emphasis in
Loango on fighting terrorism in central Africa. Gabon
Defence Minister Ernest Mpouho Epigat pointed to the
challenges posed by maritime piracy, but also warned that
the Nigerian Islamist movement Boko Haram was in striking
distance of central African nations. "Cameroon is now on
the frontline," Epigat warned. "It is good that the
countries of the sub-region hold this kind of exercise to
see how we can pool our personnel and resources to respond
to these threats and push them as far away as we
can." 

A bit of
history 

Until recently,
CEEAC was seen as slow to develop a serious military
profile. Formed in 1983, it was virtually moribund for much
of the 1990s, falling victim to regional rivalries and
having a lack of shared priorities. Geographically, it seems
an incongruous grouping of nations, stretching from Sao
Tomé and Principe in the Atlantic to Chad. 

CEEAC used an extraordinary summit in
Libreville (Gabon) in February 1998 to put itself on a new
footing. At a subsequent meeting in Malabo (Equatorial
Guinea) in 1999, heads of state outlined the need to work
more closely on peace and security issues. Tracing CEEAC's
history, security analyst Angela Meyer observed in Peace and Security
Cooperation in Central Africa: Challenges and
Prospects: "The lessons from years of conflict and
crises made it clear that regional economic cooperation
could not succeed without regional peace and
security." 

Progress was initially
slow. Member states were bitterly divided over the conflict
in the Democratic Republic of Congo, which broke out in
1998. Chad and Angola sent troops to defend embattled
President Laurent Kabila; Rwanda and Burundi backed rebels
advancing on Kinshasa. 

Stronger regional framework takes
shape 

But a stronger
regional security framework did take shape. The Council of
Peace and Security of Central Africa (COPAX), operational
since 2004, was set up to guide regional policy on defence
and security and given a mandate not only to deploy civilian
and military missions, but to help mediate in
crises. 

The Commission of Defence
and Security, made up of military and police chiefs, works
under a regional Planning Element and military
headquarters,
based in Libreville. CEEAC has at its disposal a Strategic
Analysis Group and a Rapid Alert Mechanism for Central
Africa, operating as an early warning system. Pointe Noire
in Congo hosts a Regional Centre for Maritime
Security. 

The collective security
initiatives taken in Central Africa are in line with
priorities outlined for the African Union's (AU) African
Peace and Security Architecture (APSA), which stresses the
need for viable regional structures that replicate what the
AU is doing at continental level. For example, the AU wants
to see regional versions of its Peace and Security Council
(PSC) and its Continental Early Warning System, which
CEEAC's MARAC seeks to emulate. 

Critical to the AU's long-term security plans is the
African Standby Force (ASF), which has the right to intervene in a member
state "in grave circumstances, namely war crimes, genocide
and crimes against humanity". The ASF's viability is
premised on efficient standby arrangements with Africa's
five sub-regions, which should "enable Africans to respond
swiftly to a crisis unhampered by any heavy political and
instrumental burden."  

In
principle, each regional bloc now has its own contingent
earmarked for ASF deployments, with FOMAC joining parallel
forces in other parts of the continent. An AU review of APSA's progress in 2010
acknowledged serious problems with each region
in delivering on commitments, pointing to ongoing conflicts
and a lack of operational capacity as major
handicaps.  

FOMAC - a force in progress 

FOMAC was not singled out for criticism, but
clearly needed to become more professional and better
coordinated. 

Set up in 2002,
FOMAC's standing orders identified the force as being made
up of military, police, gendarmerie and civilian personnel,
ready to carry out "peace, security and humanitarian
assistance missions". FOMAC's duties also extend to
disarmament and demobilization work and control of fraud and
organizational crimes. 

Compared to
the experience gained by Economic Community of West African
States (ECOWAS) troops in West African conflicts, including
Liberia,
Sierra Leone and Guinea-Bissau, Central African soldiers
saw little combat in regional missions, but no shortage of
capacity-building and practical collaboration. 

Loango 14, which was months
in the planning, was the latest in a series of multinational
training events, going back nearly a decade, which have
become increasing ambitious in their scale and objectives.
Chad played host to the Barh el Ghazel exercises in 2005 and
2007. Over 3,500 personnel took part in Kwanza 2010 in
Angola. 

Filling a
vacuum in CAR 

It was the
succession of crises in CAR which gave Central African
troops their first exposure to a regional war zone. FOMUC,
the multinational force of the six-nation Economic and
Monetary Community of Central Africa (CEMAC), was stationed
in
Bangui with a brief to support the CAR Armed Forces, which
had been hit by a wave of mutinies, threatening the rule of
President Ange-Félix Patassé. (CEMAC members are: Gabon,
Cameroon, CAR, Chad, Congo and Equatorial Guinea). 

FOMUC was superseded in 2008 by the Mission
of Consolidation of Peace in CAR (MICOPAX - a specific
mission of FOMAC). Funded in part by the EU and working
closely with French troops, its mandate was to help
establish peace and security.

After a
long period of low-intensity guerrilla activity and hesitant
peacebuilding, MICOPAX was hinting at a withdrawal by
September 2012. A Chadian commander told Radio France Internationale
(RFI): "Elections have been held and we are now in a
phase of consolidating the peace."  

But the emergence of Séléka, a newly
formed, heavily armed rebel coalition ended that
complacency. As Séléka made critical territorial gains
from December 2012, CEEAC called for more troops, but could
not prevent the fall of Bangui. 

As
CEEAC tried, with difficulty, to drive the peace process
outside CAR, MICOPAX numbers tripled, with over 2,000 troops
deployed. MICOPAX 2's brief was ambitious: to guarantee
security, provide protection and help restore police and
judicial system. The leading contributors were Congo,
Burundi, Chad and Rwanda, although Rwanda had left CEEAC in
2007. 

Often overshadowed by the
French military presence, FOMAC again faced accusations of
poor leadership and incoherence and having
little real presence outside Bangui. FOMAC's Chadian
contingent was accused of aligning itself with the Séléka
rebels, a charge strongly denied by the Chadian
authorities. 

In December 2013,
after lengthy talks between the AU and CEEAC, peacekeeping
operations were formally transferred to the African-led
International Support Mission to the Central African
Republic (MISCA), which in turn transferred authority to the UN
Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in CAR
(MINUSCA) in September 2014.  

Troops from CEMAC countries still make up the vast
majority of troops deployed in the CAR. 

The
verdict on MICOPAX 

FOMAC's role in the country has been much
criticised. But Alex Vines, head of the Africa programme at
the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham
House), said FOMAC soldiers had endeavoured to protect the
civilian population, perhaps more effectively than other
outside forces. "It was not a particularly exemplary
operation", Vines told IRIN. "But the troops were there
in very difficult circumstances." 

Vines, who has authored a 10-year study of the AU's approach to
continental security, A Decade of African Peace and
Security, Architecture, said all of the regional forces
meant to contribute to the ASF fell short of the AU's
requirements.
He noted the lack of a regional leader, the role played
(controversially) by Nigeria in West Africa in the past, and
also of states, like Angola, having a stake in different
regional blocs. 

Rwanda rejoins the fold 

Rwanda pulled out of CEEAC in 2007, pleading
insufficient funds, and engagements in too many other
regional blocs, the East Africa Community (EAC), for
example. The deployment of Rwanda troops in the CAR as part
of MICOPAX suggested that Rwanda was ready to re-engage with
CEEAC. This was confirmed by Rwandan Foreign Minister Louise
Mushikiwab at Loanga, who said her country had come a long
way from the genocide of 1994 and wanted to play a full role
in CEEAC. "We have decided to rejoin our brothers and
sisters in Central Africa with whom we share an important
heritage," Mushikiwabo explained. "At the next
of its summits, we will reintegrate with CEEAC. With great
pleasure we will come back into the heart of the
family." 

lmm/cs/cb 
Theme (s): Conflict, Security,[This report does not necessarily reflect the views of
the United Nations]Central African peacekeeping force gears up for
action
       Central
African peacekeeping force gears up for
actionWith hundreds of soldiers
from its member states successfully completing a series of
joint exercises and manoeuvres in Congo, the Economic
Community of Central
Afri...View
on www.irinnews.orgPreview
by Yahoo 
















__._,_.___

Posted by: Pierre Chekem <p_chekem@yahoo.co.uk>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)

Yahoo Groups
Test Campaign
subject line for test

----------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaRealities-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaRealities-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaRealities-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-http://www.africarealities.com/

-https://www.facebook.com/africarealities

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-New International Scholarships opportunities: http://www.scholarshipsgate.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Support Our Work Now !

Africa Realities Media is independent. Your support helps us expose injustice, challenge silence and produce evidence-based analysis on Africa and the Great Lakes Region.

Recent Posts

Show more
Africa Realities Media offre un espace aux écrivains, chercheurs, experts, activistes, voix communautaires, militants, analystes et personnes ayant une expérience vécue qui souhaitent contribuer à des contenus réfléchis, responsables et courageux sur les changements nécessaires dans la région des Grands Lacs, ainsi que sur les réalités politiques, économiques, culturelles et sociales africaines souvent ignorées, minimisées ou mal représentées. Nos articles et vidéos visent à ouvrir le débat, renforcer la sensibilisation, encourager la pensée critique et favoriser une réflexion plus profonde sur les réalités vécues par les populations africaines. Nous voulons aider les peuples de la région des Grands Lacs à mieux comprendre leurs droits, notamment leurs droits humains, leur droit au développement, leur droit à la dignité, à la sécurité, au bien-être et à une vie meilleure. À travers nos contenus, nous cherchons également à rappeler aux décideurs, aux institutions publiques, aux acteurs régionaux et internationaux, ainsi qu’aux responsables politiques, leur devoir de transparence, de responsabilité et de redevabilité envers les populations qu’ils prétendent servir. Notre objectif est de contribuer à une culture de vérité, de justice, de participation citoyenne et de protection égale pour tous les peuples africains.

Why We Exist

Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states, ruling elites, armed groups, military forces and security services. But these abuses are often sustained by international silence, Western lobbying, trade interests, migration deals, mineral access, diplomatic partnerships and unequal global accountability. Africa Realities Media exposes that system.

Lived Experience Matters

Survivors, displaced communities, refugees, families affected by repression, journalists, activists, women, young people and diaspora voices are not passive subjects. They are knowledge holders. Their experiences must shape policy, advocacy, journalism and public debate. The people closest to injustice are often closest to the solutions.

Our Principle

Africa Realities Media is rooted in one principle: African lives deserve equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Popular Posts

[RwandaLibre] Re: Miss Rwanda 2014

  En l'espace de quelques heures, en moins de 24 heures, je viens de lire 3 postings différents, provenant d'autant de membres différents, qui pointent vers la défaillance du système d'éducation au Rwanda. Certains surnomment ironiquement les diplômes générés par ce système "Merci Kagame"! Rares sont les écoles, fussent-elles du tiers-monde, où les étudiants à la fin de leurs études seraient incapables de fonctionner dans d'autres écoles à l'étranger. Pourtant c'est la triste réalité actuelle au Rwanda. Pour ceux qui connaissent le fonctionnement des Nations-Unies, il est grand temps de dépêcher sur place un rapporteur spécial... L'UNESCO peut-être! Sibomana Jean Bosco. *DHR* BBC: Iyumvire uburyo Kagame na FPR bazambije uburezi mu Rwanda kuburyo ababyeyi bifite bahitamo kohereza abana babo hanze Libellés : Forums Peter Rwagasabo - 29 janv. à rwagasabo, (bcc:Democrac...

[RwandaLibre] Itangazo ry'inama yahuje amashyaka i Buruseli kuwa 01/02/2014 -

  http://www.veritasinfo.fr/m/article-122363461.html Itangazo ry'inama yahuje amashyaka i Buruseli kuwa 01/02/2014 Nk'uko byari biteganyijwe, kuri uyu wa gatandatu tariki ya 01/02/2014, i Buruseli mu Bubiligi hateraniye inama y'amashyaka atavuga rumwe n'ubutegetsi bwa Perezida Paul Kagame. Ku mashyaka icumi yari yatumiwe, ayabonetse mu nama ni atandatu (60%), ari yo : 1. Forces Démocratiques Unifiées (FDU-Inkingi) ; 2. Forces Démocratiques de Libération du Rwanda (FDLR) ; 3. Pacte Démocratique du Peuple (PDP-Imanzi) ; 4. Parti pour la Démocratie au Rwanda (PDR-Ihumure) ; 5. Parti Social (PS-Imberakuri) ; 6. Rwandan Dream Initiative (RDI-Rwanda Rwiza). Ihuriro FCLR - Ubumwe naryo ryari rihagarariwe muri iyo nama.   Mu gutangira inama, abayijemo batoye umuyobozi wayo. Bamaze gusuzuma no kwemeza umurongo w'ibyigwa, bemeje ko muri iki gihe, ubufatanye  bw'amashyaka ya opposition ari ngombwa cyane  ...

The FDLR Myth: How Rwanda Weaponises a Diminished Threat to Justify Occupation

The FDLR Myth: How Rwanda Weaponises a Diminished Threat to Justify Occupation Investigation Exposes Contradictions in Rwanda's Security Narrative For over a decade, Rwanda has justified its military presence in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo by citing threats from the FDLR, a Hutu militia group linked to the 1994 genocide. But an investigation into FDLR's actual capabilities, Rwanda's military operations, and patterns of violence reveals a narrative that does not match reality. The FDLR threat, whilst real, has been systematically exaggerated and manipulated to justify objectives that have nothing to do with the militia group. Introduction The Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) occupies a central position in Rwanda's justification for military intervention in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. For more than two decades, Rwandan authorities have portrayed the militia group as an existential threat requiring sustaine...

[RwandaLibre] Re: Itangazo ry'inama yahuje amashyaka i Buruseli kuwa 01/02/2014 -

  @Mbera. Urakoze gutanga ibisobanuro birambuye kuri iyi ngingo. Ndagirango cyokora nkosore aho wafifitse nkana ugamije kujijisha rubanda.   Uragira uti: 1- [Hari ]urubuga rwa internet rw'umwimerere rwashyizweho muri 2007 http://www.fdu-rwanda.org/  n'urundi rubuga rwashinzwe n'abasigaye bakorera mu nzego bashyizeho bo nyuma y'aho Présidente agiriye mu Rwanda, arirwo http://www.fdu-rwanda.com/  rwashinzwe muri 2011. Nk'umuntu wamye uba Umunyamabanga mukuru wa FDU-Inkingi ukaba n'umuvugizi wayo kandi ukaba igikomeje kubyiyuta n'ubwo zahinduye imirishyo, wagombye kuba uzi ko Original website ya FDU-Inkingi yari  www.fdu-udf.org nk'uko bigararara muri iri tangazo ryo kuwa 23 Kamena 2010 umbere y'amakimbirane yatangiye muri january 2011: Nta kandida wigenga uzava muri FDU http://www.victoire2010.com/uploads/media/UMUKANDIDA_WA__FDU_01.pdf Kuba ruriya rubuga rundi rwaragiyeho nyuma byo ntawe utabizi kandi byar...

The Aggressor’s Complaint: Why Rwanda’s “Biased” US Sanctions Argument Echoes Russia

Kigali wants Washington to punish Congo too. But a ceasefire that leaves the occupier in place is not peace; it is occupation without noise. African lives are not worth less. African deaths are not normal. Western interests must never become a licence to kill African people. Introduction: A Familiar Complaint On 29 June 2026, Rwanda’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Olivier Nduhungirehe, sat before the cameras of France 24 and declared that his country was “disappointed by the increasingly biased US mediation” in the conflict with the Democratic Republic of Congo. He asked why sanctions had targeted only Rwanda. He called the measures unfair, one-sided and counterproductive. Weeks earlier, President Paul Kagame had told Jeune Afrique that sanctions and threats were insults thrown at Rwanda, and accused Washington of exerting heavy pressure on Rwanda while treating the DRC more delicately. The grievance sounds reasonable until you remember where you have heard it before. Since 2022, the Kr...

THE GENOCIDE AGAINST THE HUTU. PART 2: DOCUMENTED MASS KILLINGS OF HUTU POPULATIONS

MASS KILLINGS OF HUTU BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER 1994 IN RWANDA, DRC AND UGANDA INTRODUCTION TO PART 2 Part 1 established the assassination of President Habyarimana, the Bruguière and Spanish investigations, Kagame's responsibility for starting the war, the Kigali massacres, challenges to the "genocide against the Tutsi only" narrative, and the need for UN framework revision. Part 2 documents specific mass killings of Hutu populations that have been systematically erased from history: the Kibeho massacre of 1995, the Byumba Stadium massacre of 1994, the hunting and slaughter of Hutu refugees in the Democratic Republic of Congo from 1996 to 1997, killings in Uganda, and the pattern of political assassinations and property seizures. 2. THE KIBEHO MASSACRE (22 APRIL 1995) 2.1 The Camp and Its Population By April 1995, the Kibeho internally displaced persons camp in Gikongoro prefecture southwestern Rwanda held between 80,000 and 100,000...

Desperate Kagame: Where Does He Go From Here—and What Comes Next?

  How Paul Kagame Uses Diplomats' "Bury Your Head in the Sand" Strategy as a Green Light to Continue Rwanda's War in the DRC Africa Realities Media   |   17 July 2026 The purpose of this article is to expose a deliberate and systematic strategy: Paul Kagame's years-long practice of creating events — diplomatic dinners, RPF party meetings, genocide commemorations, international business forums and RPF Bureau Politique addresses — to which he invites foreign ambassadors and the world's business and political elite for one purpose: to explain, justify, and defend Rwanda's military invasion of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Everybody who follows this region knows the strategy now. The same narrative. The same arguments. The same defiance. At one event he tells the Trump Administration to go to hell. At the next he says those sanctioning him will leave power and he will remain. At the RPF Bureau Politique of 17 July 2026, he tells ambassadors that the on...

Analyse de l'audition de M Dacian Cioloș, candidat au poste de Secrétaire général de la Francophonie

  Le 30 juin 2026, pour la première fois en cinquante-six ans d'existence de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie, les candidats au poste de Secrétaire général ont été auditionnés publiquement devant les ministres des Affaires étrangères des 53 États membres de plein droit, réunis en Conférence ministérielle extraordinaire à Paris. Parmi les quatre prétendants au mandat 2027-2030, qui sera attribué par les chefs d'État au XXe Sommet de la Francophonie à Phnom Penh les 15 et 16 novembre 2026, figure un profil inédit : Dacian Cioloș, ancien Premier ministre de Roumanie, ancien commissaire européen à l'Agriculture et ancien président du groupe Renew au Parlement européen, seul candidat non africain de la course. Cet article, premier d'une série de cinq consacrée aux auditions, analyse la prestation de M. Cioloș sur huit axes : la vision, l'innovation, le développement des communautés locales, la promotion de la langue française, les conflits et la s...

Kagame désespéré : où va-t-il aller maintenant — et que va-t-il se passer ensuite ?

Comment Paul Kagame utilise la stratégie diplomatique de « l’autruche » comme feu vert pour poursuivre la guerre du Rwanda en RDC Le but de cet article est d’exposer une stratégie délibérée et systématique : la pratique, poursuivie depuis des années par Paul Kagame, consistant à créer des événements — dîners diplomatiques, réunions du parti FPR, commémorations du génocide, forums internationaux d’affaires et interventions devant le Bureau Politique du FPR — auxquels il invite des ambassadeurs étrangers ainsi que l’élite mondiale des affaires et de la politique dans un seul but : expliquer, justifier et défendre l’invasion militaire de la République démocratique du Congo par le Rwanda. Tous ceux qui suivent cette région connaissent désormais cette stratégie. Le même récit. Les mêmes arguments. La même défiance. Lors d’un événement, il dit à l’administration Trump d’aller au diable. Lors du suivant, il affirme que ceux qui le sanctionnent quitteront le pouvoir tandis que lui restera. Lor...

Analyse de l'audition de Mme Coumba Bâ, candidate au poste de Secrétaire général de la Francophonie

La francophonie utile à l'épreuve des projets concrets Conseillère à la présidence mauritanienne, forte d'une longue expérience auprès de cinq chefs d'État successifs de son pays, Coumba Bâ porte la candidature de la Mauritanie au poste de Secrétaire général de la Francophonie, dont le titulaire du mandat 2027-2030 sera désigné par les chefs d'État au XXe Sommet de la Francophonie, prévu à Phnom Penh les 15 et 16 novembre 2026. Son audition publique du 30 juin 2026 à Paris, devant les ministres des Affaires étrangères des 53 États membres de plein droit, reposait sur un positionnement singulier : celui d'un pays carrefour, à la fois africain, arabe et sahélien, présenté comme un pont possible vers les États qui ont quitté l'organisation. Cet article, quatrième d'une série de cinq consacrée aux auditions, analyse sa prestation sur huit axes : la vision, l'innovation, le développement des communautés locales, la promotion de la langue française, les confli...

Why Africa Realities Media Is Different

Africa Realities Media speaks to Africa and to the developed world. Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states and ruling elites, but they are often protected by international silence, lobbying, public relations, trade interests, migration deals and unequal global accountability. While governments pay lobbyists to present a good image abroad, ordinary African people continue to face violence, hunger, disease, poverty, repression and exclusion. We challenge the normalisation of African suffering and demand equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Pourquoi Africa Realities Media est différent?

Africa Realities Media s’adresse à l’Afrique et au monde développé. De nombreux abus subis par les peuples africains sont commis par des États africains et des élites dirigeantes, mais ils sont souvent protégés par le silence international, le lobbying, les relations publiques, les intérêts commerciaux, les accords migratoires et une responsabilité mondiale inégale. Tandis que des gouvernements paient des lobbyistes pour présenter une bonne image à l’étranger, des Africains ordinaires continuent de faire face à la violence, à la faim, aux maladies, à la pauvreté, à la répression et à l’exclusion. Nous contestons la normalisation de la souffrance africaine et exigeons une vérité égale, une justice égale et une protection égale.

BBC News

Policy and Systems Change

Our work is designed to trigger debate, discomfort and action. We do not only expose injustice; we work for policy and systems change. We want governments and institutions to address the root causes of inequality, disadvantage, discrimination, exclusion and barriers affecting African people. We believe lasting change must be shaped by people with lived experience.

Exposing Injustice in Africa

Africa Realities Media is an independent African accountability platform based in London. We report, analyse and challenge the systems that shape African suffering, silence African victims and protect abusive power. We are not here to repeat diplomatic language. We are here to ask the questions that are often avoided: why are African deaths treated as normal? Why are African victims given less urgency? Why are governments that imprison, exclude, displace or kill their own people protected when they serve powerful international interests?

Africanews

Africa Realities Media gives space to writers, researchers, experts, activists, community voices, campaigners, analysts and people with lived experience who want to contribute thoughtful, responsible and courageous content about the changes needed in the region, as well as the political, economic, cultural and social African realities that are often ignored, minimised or misrepresented. Our articles and videos aim to encourage debate, raise awareness, stimulate critical thinking and support reflection. We seek to help people in the Great Lakes Region understand their rights to human rights, development and wellbeing, while also encouraging decision-makers to be more transparent, responsive and accountable.

Appel à contributions

Sensibilisez le public aux causes qui vous tiennent à cœur. Prenez part au changement que vous souhaitez voir émerger. Aidez à combattre l’injustice partout où elle se manifeste.

Africa Realities Media accueille des articles originaux, analyses, tribunes, réflexions communautaires et commentaires fondés sur des faits concernant la région des Grands Lacs africains, ainsi que les questions liées à la justice, aux droits humains, à la gouvernance, aux conflits, à la paix, aux réfugiés, aux ressources naturelles et à la responsabilité publique en Afrique.

Nous accueillons également les annonces concernant de nouvelles ou d’anciennes publications liées à nos domaines d’intérêt. Vous pouvez annoncer gratuitement votre publication, notamment un livre, un rapport, une étude, un article académique ou tout autre travail pertinent.

Les articles doivent être rédigés en anglais ou en français et ne doivent pas dépasser 1 500 mots.

Veuillez inclure le nom complet de l’auteur, qui sera publié avec l’article s’il est accepté.

Avant de soumettre votre article, veuillez d’abord lire nos pages du site web afin de vérifier si votre article correspond à nos priorités éditoriales, à nos thèmes et à nos domaines d’intérêt.

Si vous avez un article, un commentaire ou une annonce de publication à partager avec un public plus large, veuillez l’envoyer par email à :

africarealitiesmedia@gmail.com

Nous étudierons la possibilité de publier gratuitement les articles et annonces de publications appropriés s’ils répondent à nos critères éditoriaux, notamment la pertinence, la clarté, l’originalité, l’intérêt public, le respect des communautés concernées et l’utilisation responsable des informations et des preuves.

Les articles sont publiés tels qu’ils sont soumis s’ils répondent à nos critères et à notre politique éditoriale. Nous ne procédons pas à une modification supplémentaire de votre article avant sa publication.