Skip to main content

About Africa Realities Media

Eldis Governance Reporter - Focus on corruption

 

In this issue: drivers of corruption; corruption and REDD+: lessons from the Philippines; Guinea: anti-corruption institutions; fighting corruption in South Asia; Brazilian anti-corruption legislation and its enforcement; corruption risks and mitigating approaches in climate finance

 

Governance

Highlighting research relating to democratic governance, fragile states, institutional development, justice, good governance, public sector & service delivery and urban governance.

HOME

LATEST NEWS

TOPICS

COUNTRY PROFILES

JOBS

CONTACT

Eldis Governance Reporter

24 October 2014
www.eldis.org/go/topics/resource-guides/governance


This is our regular bulletin that highlights recent publications on governance issues.

The documents highlighted here are available to download online without charge. If you are unable to access any of these materials online and would like to receive a copy of a document as an email attachment, please contact our editor at the email address given below.


In this issue:

 

  1. Drivers of corruption: a brief review
  2. The political economy of corruption and REDD+: lessons from the Philippines' pilot sites
  3. Guinea: anti-corruption institutions
  4. Fighting corruption in South Asia: building accountability
  5. Brazilian anti-corruption legislation and its enforcement: potential lessons for institutional design
  6. Corruption risks and mitigating approaches in climate finance

Drivers of corruption: a brief review

Authors: Søreide,T.
Produced by: World Bank (2014)


For many years, corruption was seen as primarily, if not exclusively, a political problem with little or no relevance to economic development. Recently, however, the nexus between corruption and governance issues, on theone hand, and development, including economic development, on the other, has become clear.

Along with the evolution in their understanding of corruption as a development issue, the international financial institutions (IFIs), have developed legal and policy frameworks to deal with corruption in their operations. This paper provides an overview of scholarly literature explaining the risk of corruption, and looks at policy implications amd areas for further research.

The report concludes that:

  • anticorruption is now on the political agenda in most countries, formal and informal controls haveimproved, and the space for conducting corrupt acts has shrunk
  • however, corruption persists because actors with authority profit and the risks cannot be completely eradicated. Constant awareness of how strategies against corruption can be made more efficient is required, and governments, organisations, and state institutions should draw on the knowledge at hand
  • cross-disciplinary collaboration is needed to advance this agenda, because solutions require understanding of such topics as an individual's psychology, framework conditions, formal and informal structures andnorms, organizations in the private and public sector, and legal aspects



Available online at: http://www.eldis.org/cf/rdr/?doc=69498

Back to list



 

The political economy of corruption and REDD+: lessons from the Philippines' pilot sites

Authors: Mayo-Anda,G.; Torres,J.
Produced by: U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre (2014)


Corruption is a continuing feature of the Philippines' natural resource sectors. Given keen interest in the country's REDD+ potential, it is useful to consider corruption risks related to REDD+ from a political economy perspective.

This U4 Issue draws on fieldwork from two REDD+ pilot sites to assess current governance and anti-corruption safeguards related to benefit-sharing, land tenure rights for indigenous peoples, and private sector involvement. Many anti corruption actions are in place in the pilot sites, but they are weakly embedded in social relations at the local level. More work is required to raise awareness of the benefits of governance safeguards to livelihoods and security of land tenure. The lack of a national REDD+ coordinating body means that the collection and dissemination of relevant anti-corruption lessons for REDD+ nationally remains challenging. Existing anti-corruption initiatives require solid implementation strategies as well as adequate financial support.



Available online at: http://www.eldis.org/cf/rdr/?doc=69499

Back to list



 

Guinea: anti-corruption institutions

Produced by: Open Society Initiative for West Africa (2013)


After languishing for ten years or more, efforts to tackle corruption in Guinea received a serious crack of the whip immediately after the presidential elections of November 2010. The government relaunched systematic audits of public procurement, which were also carried out more professionally than they had been before. The new administration also brought more transparency to the governance of the mining sector and more rigour to the management of public finances.

Three years after the president took office, however, these efforts against corruption have stalled. This report explores the reasons they have become bogged down, through an examination of the operations and legal framework for the organs charged with the fight against corruption, as well as an evaluation of their work in practice. Rather than being a study of the extent of corruption in Guinea, the report is concerned with the bodies and mechanisms put in place to try to reduce it. It consists of a critical evaluation of the strategy and institutional framework for anti-corruption measures. It proposes simple, practical and coherent measures to breathe new life into the efforts to fight against corruption in Guinea.
[Summary taken from publisher]



Available online at: http://www.eldis.org/cf/rdr/?doc=69538

Back to list



 

Fighting corruption in South Asia: building accountability

Produced by: Transparency International (2014)


Hardly a speech is delivered in South Asia without mention of the need to fight corruption in the region. Yet despite the lofty promises, corruption is on the rise. This report shows how a serious lack of political will on the part of governments to make laws work, means that government action to fight corruption is largely ineffective.

The report draws on the findings of in-depth research on anti-corruption efforts in Bangladesh, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, which analysed almost 70 institutions across the six countries. While none of the institutions assessed were found to be free from corruption risks, this report focuses in particular on the judiciary and anti-corruption agencies as critical actors in the fight against corruption. It highlights common challenges in the region and presents the governments of South Asia with a clear set of urgent priorities which need to be addressed in order to translate their anti-corruption rhetoric into concrete action.

The key findings of the report are:

  1. Citizens find themselves unable to access key information on how their governments are performing in order to hold them to account.
  2. The lack of meaningful protection for whistleblowers means that the chances of detecting wrongdoing by those in positions of power are slim.
  3. Widespread political interference in the critical work of anti-corruption agencies and the judiciary makes them ineffective in keeping a check on government.

This situation presents serious challenges for the rule of law in the region. Some laws are inconsistent with international standards, while others are not equally enforced and independently adjudicated. As a result, corruption and other crimes are not effectively and impartially investigated or punished. This creates an atmosphere where the corrupt continue to get away with abusing their positions for their own personal gain at the public's expense.

Nevertheless, there have been some positive developments in the fight against corruption over the last 10 years. Most significantly, all six countries in this study have ratified the UN Convention against Corruption. However, there is still a long way to go to turn these commitments into meaningful action. The analysis presented here suggests a worrying reluctance on the part of the governments concerned to enable citizens to help shape the decisions that affect their daily lives.

[Summary taken from author]



Available online at: http://www.eldis.org/cf/rdr/?doc=69539

Back to list



 

Brazilian anti-corruption legislation and its enforcement: potential lessons for institutional design

Authors: Carson,L.; Mota Prado,M.
Produced by: International Research Initiative on Brazil and Africa (2014)


Over the past few decades corruption has emerged as a major issue in the global development discourse as policymakers and academics have increasingly focused on the political economy factors that promote or hinder inclusive, sustainable growth.

This paper investigates Brazil's struggle against corruption and the institutional lessons revealed therein. Since returning to a democratic system in 1985, enacting a new constitution in 1988, and holding direct elections in 1989, Brazil has been plagued by corruption scandals.

While the country outperforms many of its regional and developmental peers on various corruption-related indicators, corruption remains a problem in many areas of public life, most notably in regional and state governments, political parties, and parliament, as well as public procurement at all levels of government.

This paper examines those reforms and institutions that have, anecdotally and empirically, proven potent in combating corruption in Brazil. Specifically, there has been significant progress associated with the systems of oversight and investigation but very little progress associated with punishment. Highlighting the interrelationships among state accountability institutions in these arenas, the authors argue that the duplication of oversight and investigative functions among various governmental entities has strengthened their collective impact.



Available online at: http://www.eldis.org/cf/rdr/?doc=69288

Back to list



 

Corruption risks and mitigating approaches in climate finance

Authors: Chêne,M.
Produced by: U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre (2014)


There are major governance and corruption challenges associated with climate finance, with huge amounts of money from a wide variety of sources flowing through new, complex and relatively untested funding mechanisms at international, national and local levels.

Yet, as climate governance is still in a formative stage, research on the corruption risks associated with climate finance is nascent and represents a rapidly evolving field of investigation. An important stream of research focuses on understanding the complex web of actors and institutions involved in climate finance decisions, the scale and nature of money flows, as well as where the money is coming from and where it is going. While there is an emerging body of research on national and global mechanisms, it is also important to explore the risks and opportunities presented by local-level climate financing, and to gain a better understanding on how the global, national and local levels relate to each other, so that various interests can be better balanced, articulated and integrated to promote greater responsibility and accountability in climate finance.

Research into the governance and accountability frameworks of the various actors involved and how these are implemented at the international, national and local levels, is also important in gaining a clearer picture of how best to mitigate corruption risks and identify emerging good practice.

Lessons learnt on best practice from development assistance as well as other sectors can help inform the debate.



Available online at: http://www.eldis.org/cf/rdr/?doc=69381

Back to list

 

 


See our Governance Resource Guide for a complete list of new additions.

You are welcome to re-use material from this bulletin on your own website but please acknowledge Eldis as the source and include a link to the Eldis website (either to our home page or to the home page of one of our Resource Guides). Eldis data is available under a creative commons license and is accessible via an Open API for others to re-use. In addition we have developed a number of plug-ins and modules for website content management systems such as WordPress, Joomla and Drupal to make it easier for website managers and bloggers to integrate Eldis content into their sites. See www.eldis.org/go/get-the-data for more information

If you would like to change your subscription or receive this bulletin (or any other of our subject focused email bulletins) regularly, you can register from our website, or just send an email to the address below.

You can also receive this update as an RSS Newsfeed. Visit our page at: http://www.eldis.org/go/subscribe


Eldis is funded by UKAid and Irish Aid.

Eldis is one of a family of Knowledge Services at IDS.

The views expressed in this newsletter and on the Eldis website are the opinion of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Eldis, IDS or its funders.


Contact details:
Julia Hamaus
Eldis Programme
Institute of Development Studies
Sussex Brighton BN1 9RE
UK

Email:eldis-governance@ids.ac.uk
Tel: +44 1273 915761+44 1273 915761
Fax: +44 1273 621202
WWW: www.eldis.org/go/topics/resource-guides/governance


If you would like to receive information about other Knowledge Services and publications from IDS, please email your name, contact details and subject interests to us at knowledgeservices@ids.ac.uk


Eldis Resource Guides

Agriculture and food Climate change Conflict and security Gender Governance HIV and AIDS Health Health systems ICTs for development Rising Powers

 

follow on Twitter | Like on Facebook |

Copyright © 2013 The Institute of Development Studies, All rights reserved.
Our mailing address is: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RE. UK

Comments

Support Our Work Now !

Africa Realities Media is independent. Your support helps us expose injustice, challenge silence and produce evidence-based analysis on Africa and the Great Lakes Region.
Africa Realities Media offre un espace aux écrivains, chercheurs, experts, activistes, voix communautaires, militants, analystes et personnes ayant une expérience vécue qui souhaitent contribuer à des contenus réfléchis, responsables et courageux sur les changements nécessaires dans la région des Grands Lacs, ainsi que sur les réalités politiques, économiques, culturelles et sociales africaines souvent ignorées, minimisées ou mal représentées. Nos articles et vidéos visent à ouvrir le débat, renforcer la sensibilisation, encourager la pensée critique et favoriser une réflexion plus profonde sur les réalités vécues par les populations africaines. Nous voulons aider les peuples de la région des Grands Lacs à mieux comprendre leurs droits, notamment leurs droits humains, leur droit au développement, leur droit à la dignité, à la sécurité, au bien-être et à une vie meilleure. À travers nos contenus, nous cherchons également à rappeler aux décideurs, aux institutions publiques, aux acteurs régionaux et internationaux, ainsi qu’aux responsables politiques, leur devoir de transparence, de responsabilité et de redevabilité envers les populations qu’ils prétendent servir. Notre objectif est de contribuer à une culture de vérité, de justice, de participation citoyenne et de protection égale pour tous les peuples africains.

Why We Exist

Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states, ruling elites, armed groups, military forces and security services. But these abuses are often sustained by international silence, Western lobbying, trade interests, migration deals, mineral access, diplomatic partnerships and unequal global accountability. Africa Realities Media exposes that system.

Lived Experience Matters

Survivors, displaced communities, refugees, families affected by repression, journalists, activists, women, young people and diaspora voices are not passive subjects. They are knowledge holders. Their experiences must shape policy, advocacy, journalism and public debate. The people closest to injustice are often closest to the solutions.

Our Principle

Africa Realities Media is rooted in one principle: African lives deserve equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Popular Posts

Why Africa Realities Media Is Different

Africa Realities Media speaks to Africa and to the developed world. Many abuses facing African people are committed by African states and ruling elites, but they are often protected by international silence, lobbying, public relations, trade interests, migration deals and unequal global accountability. While governments pay lobbyists to present a good image abroad, ordinary African people continue to face violence, hunger, disease, poverty, repression and exclusion. We challenge the normalisation of African suffering and demand equal truth, equal justice and equal protection.

Pourquoi Africa Realities Media est différent?

Africa Realities Media s’adresse à l’Afrique et au monde développé. De nombreux abus subis par les peuples africains sont commis par des États africains et des élites dirigeantes, mais ils sont souvent protégés par le silence international, le lobbying, les relations publiques, les intérêts commerciaux, les accords migratoires et une responsabilité mondiale inégale. Tandis que des gouvernements paient des lobbyistes pour présenter une bonne image à l’étranger, des Africains ordinaires continuent de faire face à la violence, à la faim, aux maladies, à la pauvreté, à la répression et à l’exclusion. Nous contestons la normalisation de la souffrance africaine et exigeons une vérité égale, une justice égale et une protection égale.

BBC News

Policy and Systems Change

Our work is designed to trigger debate, discomfort and action. We do not only expose injustice; we work for policy and systems change. We want governments and institutions to address the root causes of inequality, disadvantage, discrimination, exclusion and barriers affecting African people. We believe lasting change must be shaped by people with lived experience.

Exposing Injustice in Africa

Africa Realities Media is an independent African accountability platform based in London. We report, analyse and challenge the systems that shape African suffering, silence African victims and protect abusive power. We are not here to repeat diplomatic language. We are here to ask the questions that are often avoided: why are African deaths treated as normal? Why are African victims given less urgency? Why are governments that imprison, exclude, displace or kill their own people protected when they serve powerful international interests?

Africanews

Africa Realities Media gives space to writers, researchers, experts, activists, community voices, campaigners, analysts and people with lived experience who want to contribute thoughtful, responsible and courageous content about the changes needed in the region, as well as the political, economic, cultural and social African realities that are often ignored, minimised or misrepresented. Our articles and videos aim to encourage debate, raise awareness, stimulate critical thinking and support reflection. We seek to help people in the Great Lakes Region understand their rights to human rights, development and wellbeing, while also encouraging decision-makers to be more transparent, responsive and accountable.

Recent Posts

Appel à contributions

Sensibilisez le public aux causes qui vous tiennent à cœur. Prenez part au changement que vous souhaitez voir émerger. Aidez à combattre l'injustice partout où elle se manifeste.

Africa Realities Media accueille des articles originaux, analyses, tribunes, réflexions communautaires et commentaires fondés sur des faits concernant la région des Grands Lacs africains, ainsi que les questions liées à la justice, aux droits humains, à la gouvernance, aux conflits, à la paix, aux réfugiés, aux ressources naturelles et à la responsabilité publique en Afrique.

Nous accueillons également les annonces concernant de nouvelles ou d'anciennes publications liées à nos domaines d'intérêt. Vous pouvez annoncer gratuitement votre publication, notamment un livre, un rapport, une étude, un article académique ou tout autre travail pertinent.

Les articles doivent être rédigés en anglais ou en français et ne doivent pas dépasser 1 500 mots.

Veuillez inclure le nom complet de l'auteur, qui sera publié avec l'article s'il est accepté.

Avant de soumettre votre article, veuillez d'abord lire nos pages du site web afin de vérifier si votre article correspond à nos priorités éditoriales, à nos thèmes et à nos domaines d'intérêt.

Si vous avez un article, un commentaire ou une annonce de publication à partager avec un public plus large, veuillez l'envoyer par email à :

africarealitiesmedia@gmail.com

Nous étudierons la possibilité de publier gratuitement les articles et annonces de publications appropriés s'ils répondent à nos critères éditoriaux, notamment la pertinence, la clarté, l'originalité, l'intérêt public, le respect des communautés concernées et l'utilisation responsable des informations et des preuves.

Les articles sont publiés tels qu'ils sont soumis s'ils répondent à nos critères et à notre politique éditoriale. Nous ne procédons pas à une modification supplémentaire de votre article avant sa publication.