Skip to main content

Jailed Rwandan politician slams 'ridiculous' case on appeal


Jailed Rwandan politician slams 'ridiculous' case on appeal

Facebook
14
0
19
PlacardENLARGE
(Globalpost/GlobalPost)
What do you think?
0
Must read
0
Suprising
0
Tragic
0
Inspiring
0
Odd!
Jailed Rwandan opposition figure Victoire Ingabire on Wednesday urged the country's top court to reject prosecution demands to increase her eight-year sentence on appeal, saying her case was marred by irregularities.
Ingabire was found guilty last October of terrorism and denying the country's 1994 genocide, but charges of spreading genocide ideology and of "setting up an armed group" were dropped.
Prosecutors launched an appeal with the Supreme Court that began in March, asking for her punishment to be increased to 25 years and calling for judges to reconsider the dropped charges.
In Wednesday's appeal hearing, Ingabire urged the court to dismiss those demands.
"The High Court rejected the charge of supporting an armed group, but charged me for having wished to support and armed group," Ingabire said. "This is ridiculous, how can someone be charged for having a wish?"
Evidence brought by the prosecution was "contradictory", she added.
Ingabire's defence team has also appealed against the original verdict and is seeking a full acquitall in the ongoing appeal proceedings.
Ingabire is the leader of the Unified Democratic Forces, an opposition group not recognised as a political party in Rwanda.
She is said to have made remarks in January 2010 denying genocide at a memorial in the capital Kigali to the estimated 800,000 people, the majority of them Tutsis, who were killed in Rwanda's 1994 slaughter.
Ingabire, herself a Hutu, said it was time Hutu war victims were also commemorated.
She was in the Netherlands when the genocide broke out but returned to challenge President Paul Kagame in 2010 elections, although her party was not granted registration to take part.
Kagame was re-elected with 93 percent of the vote.
str-pjm/mfp
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/afp/130417/jailed-rwandan-politician-slams-ridiculous-case-appeal

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OIF : Louise Mushikiwabo, une candidature embarrassante pour un troisième mandat de trop

C'était en novembre 2025, à Kigali. En marge de la 46e Conférence ministérielle de la Francophonie, Louise Mushikiwabo prenait la parole avec l'assurance de celle qui n'a rien à craindre : de nombreux pays, affirmait-elle, lui avaient demandé de se représenter. Spontanément. Naturellement. Unanimement presque. Sauf que les faits racontent une tout autre histoire. L'annonce qui ne devait pas avoir lieu si tôt Novembre 2025. Le Centre de Conventions de Kigali accueille plus de 400 délégués des 90 États membres de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Le thème officiel porte sur les femmes et l'égalité des genres, trente ans après Pékin. Mais en marge des séances plénières, c'est une autre affaire qui agite les couloirs : Louise Mushikiwabo vient d'annoncer qu'elle souhaite briguer un troisième mandat. L'annonce est prématurée. Délibérément. Les candidatures ne ferment qu'en avril 2026. Aucun autre pays n'a encore ...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines ne fonctionnent pas contre le Rwanda

Pourquoi Paul Kagame a ignoré les sanctions américaines et la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU Entre février 2025 et mars 2026, le Trésor américain a imposé deux séries de sanctions ciblant directement la machine de guerre du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo : d'abord James Kabarebe, ministre d'État rwandais et principal intermédiaire du régime auprès du M23, puis les Forces de défense rwandaises en tant qu'entité, ainsi que quatre de leurs hauts responsables. Chacun des individus sanctionnés est demeuré en poste. Les FDR ne se sont pas retirées. Cette analyse examine pourquoi les mesures de Washington n'ont pas modifié la conduite du Rwanda — et pourquoi, selon les propres mots de Kagame, elles sont rejetées comme l'Å“uvre des « simplement stupides ».     Introduction : des sanctions sans conséquence La campagne de sanctions de Washington contre les opérations militaires du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo s'...

Paul Kagame: “We refuse to remove defensive measures"

Paul Kagame Refuses to Implement the Washington Accords and UN Security Council Resolution 2773: Analysis and Implications In an exclusive interview published on 3 April 2026, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda openly confirmed that Rwandan forces are deployed in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, rejected calls for their withdrawal, dismissed US sanctions as illegitimate, and signalled clear satisfaction with the current military status quo. This briefing examines what Kagame said, what his remarks mean for the Washington Accords, and what concrete steps the United States must now take if it wishes to restore credibility to its diplomacy in the Great Lakes region. Introduction: A Confession Wrapped in Grievance The interview, conducted by François Soudan and published in Jeune Afrique on 3 April 2026, is one of the most candid public statements Paul Kagame has made on Rwanda's military role in the DRC. Its significance does not lie in revealing something previously unknown. Th...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute