Skip to main content

Good Riddance to Ntaganda, Now What? | PRLog


Good Riddance to Ntaganda, Now What?


M23 leader Bosco Ntaganda surrendered at the US Embassy in Kigali on Monday. Ntaganda, called "the Terminator" for his war crimes in the Congo, is the latest in a long line of Rwandans & Rwandan backed rebels fighting for control in eastern Congo.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

PRLog (Press Release) – Mar 19, 2013 – Contact: Kitty Kurth 
Phone: 312-617-7288 
Email: kitty@kurthlampe.com

Good Riddance to Ntaganda, Now What? 

The surrender of former M23 leader Bosco Ntaganda at the US Embassy in Kigali on Monday is excellent news for justice in the Congo. Ntaganda, who holds the terrible nickname of "the Terminator" for his horrific war crimes in the Congo, is one of the latest in a long line of Rwandans and Rwandan supported rebel leaders fighting for control in the eastern Congo. The fact that he turned himself over to the United States government, requesting a transfer to the International Criminal Court (ICC) where he will be tried on numerous charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity, is both good and significant news. The United States should fulfill this request to be moved to the ICC as soon as possible.

Paul Rusesabagina, President of the Hotel Rwanda Rusesabagina Foundation (http://www.hrrfoundation.org) said, "Good riddance to General Ntaganda.  But the question is what next for the conflict in the Congo? Which rebel leader will Rwanda prop up next - Nkunda, then Ntaganda, then who? How did this bad guy move freely across Rwanda and straight in to the American Embassy in Kigali? The surrender raises as many questions as it answers. Hopefully, the M23 will stop killing innocent people.  But, when will Rwanda stop sending killers in to the Congo?"  

Past "rebel" leaders supported by Paul Kagame's Rwanda have quietly left the public scene when their actions in Congo became too embarrassing for the Rwandan government. This includes Ntaganda's predecessor, indicted war criminal Laurent Nkunda, who is still under "house arrest" while walking free in Kigali. Rwanda's pattern in the region is well-established by the international community. They support a "rebel" movement, not really rebelling against the Congolese government, but rather seeking control of the eastern Congo to funnel illegal resources to Rwanda. At times however, violence escalates in the Congo to the point where Rwanda is publicly embarrassed by their militias. When this happens, it is not unusual for a militia leader to disappear back across the border into Rwanda until the uproar dies away, and then be quietly replaced with a new leader more complacent to Rwandan government commands, and less embarrassing to the regime there. This is what has been happening over the last few weeks in the Congo, with public infighting among the Rwandan-backed M23 group, leading to Ntaganda and others fleeing back to Rwanda.

In this case though, it seems that something went wrong. The United Nations reported recently that M23 and Ntaganda were taking commands directly from Rwandan Defense Minister James Kabarebe, a charge denied by the Rwandan government. But if Ntaganda turned himself over the UN, and specifically asked to be sent to the ICC, then it seems he has had a falling out with his former commanders.

Rusesabagina continued, "Ntaganda's surrender provides an excellent opportunity for the truth to come out about Rwandan support of M23 and of the overall crisis in the Congo, which has now killed more than seven million people. The United States government must not give in to likely Rwandan requests that Ntaganda be transferred back to them. Rather the war criminal's own request for international justice should be fulfilled. In that way, his trial may be able to bring the truth to light about what is really happening in the Congo, away from the control of governments in the region. This is an opportunity for a major step forward for truth and justice, and it must not be missed."

--- End ---     Visit Press Room

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OIF : Louise Mushikiwabo, une candidature embarrassante pour un troisième mandat de trop

C'était en novembre 2025, à Kigali. En marge de la 46e Conférence ministérielle de la Francophonie, Louise Mushikiwabo prenait la parole avec l'assurance de celle qui n'a rien à craindre : de nombreux pays, affirmait-elle, lui avaient demandé de se représenter. Spontanément. Naturellement. Unanimement presque. Sauf que les faits racontent une tout autre histoire. L'annonce qui ne devait pas avoir lieu si tôt Novembre 2025. Le Centre de Conventions de Kigali accueille plus de 400 délégués des 90 États membres de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Le thème officiel porte sur les femmes et l'égalité des genres, trente ans après Pékin. Mais en marge des séances plénières, c'est une autre affaire qui agite les couloirs : Louise Mushikiwabo vient d'annoncer qu'elle souhaite briguer un troisième mandat. L'annonce est prématurée. Délibérément. Les candidatures ne ferment qu'en avril 2026. Aucun autre pays n'a encore ...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines ne fonctionnent pas contre le Rwanda

Pourquoi Paul Kagame a ignoré les sanctions américaines et la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU Entre février 2025 et mars 2026, le Trésor américain a imposé deux séries de sanctions ciblant directement la machine de guerre du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo : d'abord James Kabarebe, ministre d'État rwandais et principal intermédiaire du régime auprès du M23, puis les Forces de défense rwandaises en tant qu'entité, ainsi que quatre de leurs hauts responsables. Chacun des individus sanctionnés est demeuré en poste. Les FDR ne se sont pas retirées. Cette analyse examine pourquoi les mesures de Washington n'ont pas modifié la conduite du Rwanda — et pourquoi, selon les propres mots de Kagame, elles sont rejetées comme l'Å“uvre des « simplement stupides ».     Introduction : des sanctions sans conséquence La campagne de sanctions de Washington contre les opérations militaires du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo s'...

Paul Kagame: “We refuse to remove defensive measures"

Paul Kagame Refuses to Implement the Washington Accords and UN Security Council Resolution 2773: Analysis and Implications In an exclusive interview published on 3 April 2026, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda openly confirmed that Rwandan forces are deployed in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, rejected calls for their withdrawal, dismissed US sanctions as illegitimate, and signalled clear satisfaction with the current military status quo. This briefing examines what Kagame said, what his remarks mean for the Washington Accords, and what concrete steps the United States must now take if it wishes to restore credibility to its diplomacy in the Great Lakes region. Introduction: A Confession Wrapped in Grievance The interview, conducted by François Soudan and published in Jeune Afrique on 3 April 2026, is one of the most candid public statements Paul Kagame has made on Rwanda's military role in the DRC. Its significance does not lie in revealing something previously unknown. Th...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute